Jump to content

Got a high school football rule question?


footballref
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Legal cut blocks defined and give the reference in accordance with TSSAA.

Not exactly sure what you are referring to as legal cut blocks. Blocks below the waist are illegal unless they take place in the free blocking zone. Also, some stuff that was legal in the FBZ may not be legal starting this season (2011). We are waiting to see the wording on this. Hope the following helps answer what you are wanting to know.

 

Below is rule 2-17 about the free blocking zone. I have also posted 9-3-2

Rule 2-17

 

ART. 1 . . . The free-blocking zone is a rectangular area extending laterally 4

yards either side of the spot of the snap and 3 yards behind each line of

scrimmage. A player is in the free-blocking zone when any part of his body is in

the zone at the snap.

ART. 2 . . . Blocking below the waist is permitted in the free-blocking zone

when the following conditions are met:

a. All players involved in the blocking are on the line of scrimmage and in the

zone at the snap.

b. The contact is in the zone.

ART. 3 . . . Clipping is permitted in the free-blocking zone when the following

conditions are met:

a. By offensive linemen who are on the line of scrimmage and in the zone at

the snap.

b. Against defensive players who are on the line of scrimmage and in the zone

at the snap.

c. The contact is in the zone.

ART. 4 . . . Blocking in the back is permitted in the free-blocking zone when the

following conditions are met:

a. By offensive linemen who are on the line of scrimmage and in the zone at

the snap.

b. Against defensive players who are in the zone at the snap.

c. The contact is in the zone.

ART. 5 . . . The free-blocking zone disintegrates and the exception for a player

to block below the waist and/or the exception for an offensive lineman to clip

and/or block in the back is not to continue after the ball has left the zone.

Rule 9-3-2

 

ART. 2 . . . A player shall not block an opponent below the waist except:

a. In the free-blocking zone when the contact meets the requirements of 2-17.

b. To tackle a runner or player pretending to be a runner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not exactly sure what you are referring to as legal cut blocks. Blocks below the waist are illegal unless they take place in the free blocking zone. Also, some stuff that was legal in the FBZ may not be legal starting this season (2011). We are waiting to see the wording on this. Hope the following helps answer what you are wanting to know.

 

Below is rule 2-17 about the free blocking zone. I have also posted 9-3-2

Rule 2-17

 

ART. 1 . . . The free-blocking zone is a rectangular area extending laterally 4

yards either side of the spot of the snap and 3 yards behind each line of

scrimmage. A player is in the free-blocking zone when any part of his body is in

the zone at the snap.

ART. 2 . . . Blocking below the waist is permitted in the free-blocking zone

when the following conditions are met:

a. All players involved in the blocking are on the line of scrimmage and in the

zone at the snap.

b. The contact is in the zone.

ART. 3 . . . Clipping is permitted in the free-blocking zone when the following

conditions are met:

a. By offensive linemen who are on the line of scrimmage and in the zone at

the snap.

b. Against defensive players who are on the line of scrimmage and in the zone

at the snap.

c. The contact is in the zone.

ART. 4 . . . Blocking in the back is permitted in the free-blocking zone when the

following conditions are met:

a. By offensive linemen who are on the line of scrimmage and in the zone at

the snap.

b. Against defensive players who are in the zone at the snap.

c. The contact is in the zone.

ART. 5 . . . The free-blocking zone disintegrates and the exception for a player

to block below the waist and/or the exception for an offensive lineman to clip

and/or block in the back is not to continue after the ball has left the zone.

Rule 9-3-2

 

ART. 2 . . . A player shall not block an opponent below the waist except:

a. In the free-blocking zone when the contact meets the requirements of 2-17.

b. To tackle a runner or player pretending to be a runner.

 

Thanks for the info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does it reference mascot spearing? I'll hang up and listen. :D

 

 

Dang you Stinger!

 

I hear there is a new resturaunt up there called "The Creekbank"

 

If I ran in there on a Friday Night (during the season and a home game) with the chicken suit on, would I make it out alive?

 

:mrgreen:

Edited by realmenwearred
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone?

 

Guess I was talking more about cuts vs. chops

 

Cut and Chop block defined by me is: :D

 

Cut block is when a player goes for a block low of a defender who is free (isn't occupied with an opposing player)

 

Chop block, which is illegal, is when a player goes for the knees of a defender who is currently being occupied/blocked by another player.

 

Cut blocks are legal because the defender has the ability to avoid the cut block, but in a chop block, the defender is very vulnerable since their knees are exposed because they are busy trying to get past or shed the block of the guy they are currently playing against. Chop blocks have a higher risk for injury.

 

The "questionalbe" blocks from last season were cuts not chops. (one was pretty low, but you are playing a dynamic collision sport)

 

EDUCATE ME!

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guess I was talking more about cuts vs. chops

 

Cut and Chop block defined by me is: :D

 

Cut block is when a player goes for a block low of a defender who is free (isn't occupied with an opposing player)

 

Chop block, which is illegal, is when a player goes for the knees of a defender who is currently being occupied/blocked by another player.

 

Cut blocks are legal because the defender has the ability to avoid the cut block, but in a chop block, the defender is very vulnerable since their knees are exposed because they are busy trying to get past or shed the block of the guy they are currently playing against. Chop blocks have a higher risk for injury.

 

The "questionalbe" blocks from last season were cuts not chops. (one was pretty low, but you are playing a dynamic collision sport)

 

EDUCATE ME!

Blocks below the waist are illegal in high school unless they fit in the current criteria of the free blocking zone. There is no other way to put it. Now, if the initial contact is above the waist and the blocker slides down the person he is blocking then it is legal. Other than this blocks below the waist should be called as fouls in high school as long they are are playing under NFHS rules and 48 of the 50 states play under NFHS rules

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • Recent Posts

    • None taken ever. I just gotta believe that AC started the fire on this. Small towns talk clinton is a small town. They may have not been the official one to put ink to paper but I am sure they are the ones moving the pieces here.
    • No offense intended,  but I will take the word of an actual administrator in that system on that question. 
    • My guess is, this has absolutely nothing to do with athletics. I could be completely wrong. Just going to let this play out over the next few days/weeks before throwing accusations around. Funny how when OR benefits from “transfers” it is because of the incredible school system and never for athletics because most people can’t afford the “tuition”! Going to be interesting to say the least.    And if AC is turning anybody in, shame on them. They have benefited and work the system more than most over the years.
    • I think if either were their own school system then it wouldn't have happened. Of course a lot will make sense if they student who got their grades changed was an athlete 
    • Eh, I just think they got caught. It was gonna happen sooner or later, no matter who ended up turning them in. Even Dragon92 knew they were cheating, one of the biggest Clinton fans in the world, and probably THE biggest on here.
×
  • Create New...