Jump to content

Who hates having the Super 32?


riverrat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Not that anyone asked me but...  

 

Make all the class sizes the same give or take one.  5 or 6 classes makes no difference to me  I am ok with teams playing up.  

 

The only thing I liked about it was EQUAL region sizes.  I do not like 5 team regions when there are 9 team regions in the same class.  Make every district between 6-8, NO 4-5 or 9-10 team regions.  Don't give me the travel excuse please.

 

Let's avoid the Public v. private debate.  I just don't care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Go back to the Districts in the early 90's and put the top 2 teams in districts in playoff against the next region! Maybe let 3 teams in if need more for playoffs! Regions now compared to back then are huge!!! 

16- 4-5 Team Districts?  That is a thought.  You can play 6-7 non district games to keep things local if you desire.  I have no problem with 5-6 classes.  

 

I do not like first round byes in the playoffs that result from 3 getting in, but that may just be me.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16- 4-5 Team Districts?  That is a thought.  You can play 6-7 non district games to keep things local if you desire.  I have no problem with 5-6 classes.  

 

I do not like first round byes in the playoffs that result from 3 getting in, but that may just be me.  

I despise the 1st round byes,

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16- 4-5 Team Districts?  That is a thought.  You can play 6-7 non district games to keep things local if you desire.  I have no problem with 5-6 classes.  

 

I do not like first round byes in the playoffs that result from 3 getting in, but that may just be me.  

I think back then was far better than what they got going on now!!! Plus the way they got east/west divided!!! My boys had to go West in first round and we passede many schools who was playing in the east as we took our 5 hour drive to Waynesboro!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's pretty easy math actually.  There are 311 schools that play in Division 1, 31 schools are Division II so let them continue to do their own thing with 11 schools in AA and 20 schools in A, 4 schools are currently non-affiliated with the TSSAA (Lancaster Christian, Tennessee Christian, Memphis Catholic, and Tri-Cities Christian who didn't play a full varsity schedule this year).  I believe Memphis Catholic is going to be a member next year from what I have heard and that would bring it to 312 total schools.  If you make 6 classifications, that would be 52 teams per class.  Having 8 regions would give you half of the regions with 6 teams and half with 7 teams.  Seperate it by population at every 52 schools, then teams can apply to go up and down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's pretty easy math actually.  There are 311 schools that play in Division 1, 31 schools are Division II so let them continue to do their own thing with 11 schools in AA and 20 schools in A, 4 schools are currently non-affiliated with the TSSAA (Lancaster Christian, Tennessee Christian, Memphis Catholic, and Tri-Cities Christian who didn't play a full varsity schedule this year).  I believe Memphis Catholic is going to be a member next year from what I have heard and that would bring it to 312 total schools.  If you make 6 classifications, that would be 52 teams per class.  Having 8 regions would give you half of the regions with 6 teams and half with 7 teams.  Seperate it by population at every 52 schools, then teams can apply to go up and down.

 

Not sure if Memphis Catholic is going to DII or not, if so, get Lancaster Christian or Tennessee Christian or both in there.  If not one class would have 51 schools which is not a big deal, that would just make 5 regions with 6 teams and 3 regions with 7 in that class.  As somebody who personally would like to see more cross regional games this model would make me thrilled.  Either way it's easy math, and it would make scheduling across the state much easier on staffs as teams would need roughly the same amount of non-regional games.  I know that budgets for travel are tight, but like the poster said, he doesn't care about that with this current discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • No offense intended,  but I will take the word of an actual administrator in that system on that question. 
    • My guess is, this has absolutely nothing to do with athletics. I could be completely wrong. Just going to let this play out over the next few days/weeks before throwing accusations around. Funny how when OR benefits from “transfers” it is because of the incredible school system and never for athletics because most people can’t afford the “tuition”! Going to be interesting to say the least.    And if AC is turning anybody in, shame on them. They have benefited and work the system more than most over the years.
    • I think if either were their own school system then it wouldn't have happened. Of course a lot will make sense if they student who got their grades changed was an athlete 
    • Eh, I just think they got caught. It was gonna happen sooner or later, no matter who ended up turning them in. Even Dragon92 knew they were cheating, one of the biggest Clinton fans in the world, and probably THE biggest on here.
    • I know Hickory is worried about Keith now that they beat OR. Wonder why he hasn't posted yet. Him and Benanti are awful quiet these days.
×
  • Create New...