Jump to content

LazIndex 1A Rankings Week 11


LazIndexTN
 Share

Recommended Posts

1A

30 (1) GREENBACK ; Rating:  1.511 ; Power: 120.90 ; Sched. Rank: 211 (2)

 

57 (2) DRESDEN ; Rating:  1.413 ; Power: 119.22 ; Sched. Rank: 312 (36)

 

87 (3) WAYNE COUNTY (Waynesboro) ; Rating:  1.301 ; Power: 106.68 ; Sched. Rank: 311 (35)

 

88 (4) SOUTH PITTSBURG ; Rating:  1.299 ; Power: 111.09 ; Sched. Rank: 297 (26)

 

93 (5) UNION CITY ; Rating:  1.291 ; Power: 109.69 ; Sched. Rank: 299 (27)

 

101 (6) COALFIELD ; Rating:  1.274 ; Power: 107.27 ; Sched. Rank: 285 (20)

 

116 (7) ONEIDA ; Rating:  1.214 ; Power: 101.72 ; Sched. Rank: 200 (1)

 

124 (8) HUNTINGDON ; Rating:  1.190 ; Power: 107.34 ; Sched. Rank: 276 (17)

 

131 (9) NASHVILLE CHRISTIAN ; Rating:  1.179 ; Power: 106.10 ; Sched. Rank: 313 (37)

 

140 (10) COLUMBIA ACADEMY ; Rating:  1.146 ; Power: 99.26 ; Sched. Rank: 331 (49)

 

141 (11) TROUSDALE COUNTY (Hartsville) ; Rating:  1.145 ; Power: 99.91 ; Sched. Rank: 330 (48)

 

157 (12) HARRIMAN ; Rating:  1.101 ; Power: 99.36 ; Sched. Rank: 259 (10)

 

176 (13) FAYETTEVILLE ; Rating:  1.051 ; Power: 96.85 ; Sched. Rank: 325 (43)

 

178 (14) PEABODY (Trenton) ; Rating:  1.043 ; Power: 95.73 ; Sched. Rank: 257 (8)

 

184 (15) GORDONSVILLE ; Rating:  1.026 ; Power: 94.96 ; Sched. Rank: 288 (22)

 

186 (16) MIDDLE TN CHRISTIAN (Murfreesboro) ; Rating:  1.020 ; Power: 95.93 ; Sched. Rank: 326 (44)

 

193 (17) MIDWAY (Kingston) ; Rating:  0.991 ; Power: 98.16 ; Sched. Rank: 241 (6)

 

199 (18) HUMBOLDT ; Rating:  0.980 ; Power: 95.97 ; Sched. Rank: 279 (18)

 

213 (19) CLOUDLAND (Roan Mountain) ; Rating:  0.954 ; Power: 95.72 ; Sched. Rank: 240 (5)

 

216 (20) KIPP COLLEGIATE (Memphis) ; Rating:  0.939 ; Power: 92.48 ; Sched. Rank: 336 (53)

 

217 (21) SUMMERTOWN ; Rating:  0.938 ; Power: 86.51 ; Sched. Rank: 337 (54)

 

242 (22) HOLLOW ROCK-BRUCETON CENTRAL ; Rating:  0.858 ; Power: 80.18 ; Sched. Rank: 321 (41)

 

243 (23) WHITWELL ; Rating:  0.858 ; Power: 88.42 ; Sched. Rank: 283 (19)

 

244 (24) MEMPHIS MIDDLE COLLEGE ; Rating:  0.858 ; Power: 82.91 ; Sched. Rank: 340 (56)

 

245 (25) COLLINWOOD ; Rating:  0.855 ; Power: 83.19 ; Sched. Rank: 335 (52)

 

250 (26) JELLICO ; Rating:  0.841 ; Power: 83.09 ; Sched. Rank: 262 (12)

 

253 (27) McEWEN ; Rating:  0.835 ; Power: 82.78 ; Sched. Rank: 314 (38)

 

255 (28) CORNERSVILLE ; Rating:  0.827 ; Power: 88.67 ; Sched. Rank: 302 (30)

 

261 (29) HUNTLAND ; Rating:  0.808 ; Power: 84.31 ; Sched. Rank: 329 (47)

 

263 (30) LAKE COUNTY (Tiptonville) ; Rating:  0.806 ; Power: 81.85 ; Sched. Rank: 300 (28)

 

264 (31) OAKDALE ; Rating:  0.804 ; Power: 81.02 ; Sched. Rank: 332 (50)

 

266 (32) SOUTH FULTON ; Rating:  0.800 ; Power: 84.45 ; Sched. Rank: 263 (13)

 

273 (33) JO BYRNS (Cedar Hill) ; Rating:  0.768 ; Power: 81.52 ; Sched. Rank: 304 (32)

 

287 (34) GRACE BAPTIST (Chattanooga) ; Rating:  0.724 ; Power: 79.37 ; Sched. Rank: 339 (55)

 

291 (35) CLARKSVILLE ACADEMY ; Rating:  0.702 ; Power: 77.54 ; Sched. Rank: 233 (4)

 

292 (36) MONTEREY ; Rating:  0.692 ; Power: 78.95 ; Sched. Rank: 301 (29)

 

298 (37) GRACE CHRISTIAN (Franklin) ; Rating:  0.662 ; Power: 81.89 ; Sched. Rank: 324 (42)

 

301 (38) COPPER BASIN (Copperhill) ; Rating:  0.642 ; Power: 74.70 ; Sched. Rank: 310 (34)

 

304 (39) HANCOCK COUNTY (Sneedville) ; Rating:  0.628 ; Power: 75.79 ; Sched. Rank: 341 (57)

 

309 (40) MOORE COUNTY (Lynchburg) ; Rating:  0.612 ; Power: 75.37 ; Sched. Rank: 303 (31)

 

313 (41) GREENFIELD ; Rating:  0.600 ; Power: 72.85 ; Sched. Rank: 307 (33)

 

317 (42) PERRY COUNTY (Linden) ; Rating:  0.578 ; Power: 70.27 ; Sched. Rank: 272 (16)

 

319 (43) RED BOILING SPRINGS ; Rating:  0.565 ; Power: 71.06 ; Sched. Rank: 320 (40)

 

320 (44) SUNBRIGHT ; Rating:  0.546 ; Power: 69.62 ; Sched. Rank: 223 (3)

 

322 (45) WEST CARROLL (Atwood) ; Rating:  0.537 ; Power: 72.05 ; Sched. Rank: 254 (7)

 

324 (46) BOOKER T. WASHINGTON (Memphis) ; Rating:  0.507 ; Power: 65.47 ; Sched. Rank: 258 (9)

 

325 (47) MT. PLEASANT ; Rating:  0.503 ; Power: 71.63 ; Sched. Rank: 294 (25)

 

329 (48) RICHLAND (Lynnville) ; Rating:  0.436 ; Power: 67.81 ; Sched. Rank: 319 (39)

 

330 (49) CLAY COUNTY (Celina) ; Rating:  0.431 ; Power: 63.42 ; Sched. Rank: 293 (24)

 

331 (50) MIDDLETON ; Rating:  0.429 ; Power: 58.49 ; Sched. Rank: 290 (23)

 

334 (51) HOUSTON COUNTY (Erin) ; Rating:  0.423 ; Power: 66.02 ; Sched. Rank: 287 (21)

 

335 (52) LOOKOUT VALLEY (Chattanooga) ; Rating:  0.403 ; Power: 62.55 ; Sched. Rank: 260 (11)

 

337 (53) SALE CREEK ; Rating:  0.337 ; Power: 54.75 ; Sched. Rank: 328 (46)

 

338 (54) PICKETT COUNTY (Byrdstown) ; Rating:  0.336 ; Power: 58.04 ; Sched. Rank: 266 (14)

 

340 (55) UNAKA (Elizabethton) ; Rating:  0.320 ; Power: 54.47 ; Sched. Rank: 327 (45)

 

341 (56) GLEASON ; Rating:  0.290 ; Power: 52.39 ; Sched. Rank: 268 (15)

 

343 (57) CONCORD CHRISTIAN (Knoxville) ; Rating:  0.186 ; Power: 45.23 ; Sched. Rank: 334 (51)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1A

30 (1) GREENBACK ; Rating:  1.511 ; Power: 120.90 ; Sched. Rank: 211 (2)

 

57 (2) DRESDEN ; Rating:  1.413 ; Power: 119.22 ; Sched. Rank: 312 (36)

 

87 (3) WAYNE COUNTY (Waynesboro) ; Rating:  1.301 ; Power: 106.68 ; Sched. Rank: 311 (35)

 

88 (4) SOUTH PITTSBURG ; Rating:  1.299 ; Power: 111.09 ; Sched. Rank: 297 (26)

 

93 (5) UNION CITY ; Rating:  1.291 ; Power: 109.69 ; Sched. Rank: 299 (27)

 

101 (6) COALFIELD ; Rating:  1.274 ; Power: 107.27 ; Sched. Rank: 285 (20)

 

116 (7) ONEIDA ; Rating:  1.214 ; Power: 101.72 ; Sched. Rank: 200 (1)

 

124 (8) HUNTINGDON ; Rating:  1.190 ; Power: 107.34 ; Sched. Rank: 276 (17)

 

131 (9) NASHVILLE CHRISTIAN ; Rating:  1.179 ; Power: 106.10 ; Sched. Rank: 313 (37)

 

140 (10) COLUMBIA ACADEMY ; Rating:  1.146 ; Power: 99.26 ; Sched. Rank: 331 (49)

 

141 (11) TROUSDALE COUNTY (Hartsville) ; Rating:  1.145 ; Power: 99.91 ; Sched. Rank: 330 (48)

 

157 (12) HARRIMAN ; Rating:  1.101 ; Power: 99.36 ; Sched. Rank: 259 (10)

 

176 (13) FAYETTEVILLE ; Rating:  1.051 ; Power: 96.85 ; Sched. Rank: 325 (43)

 

178 (14) PEABODY (Trenton) ; Rating:  1.043 ; Power: 95.73 ; Sched. Rank: 257 (8)

 

184 (15) GORDONSVILLE ; Rating:  1.026 ; Power: 94.96 ; Sched. Rank: 288 (22)

 

186 (16) MIDDLE TN CHRISTIAN (Murfreesboro) ; Rating:  1.020 ; Power: 95.93 ; Sched. Rank: 326 (44)

 

193 (17) MIDWAY (Kingston) ; Rating:  0.991 ; Power: 98.16 ; Sched. Rank: 241 (6)

 

199 (18) HUMBOLDT ; Rating:  0.980 ; Power: 95.97 ; Sched. Rank: 279 (18)

 

213 (19) CLOUDLAND (Roan Mountain) ; Rating:  0.954 ; Power: 95.72 ; Sched. Rank: 240 (5)

 

216 (20) KIPP COLLEGIATE (Memphis) ; Rating:  0.939 ; Power: 92.48 ; Sched. Rank: 336 (53)

 

217 (21) SUMMERTOWN ; Rating:  0.938 ; Power: 86.51 ; Sched. Rank: 337 (54)

 

242 (22) HOLLOW ROCK-BRUCETON CENTRAL ; Rating:  0.858 ; Power: 80.18 ; Sched. Rank: 321 (41)

 

243 (23) WHITWELL ; Rating:  0.858 ; Power: 88.42 ; Sched. Rank: 283 (19)

 

244 (24) MEMPHIS MIDDLE COLLEGE ; Rating:  0.858 ; Power: 82.91 ; Sched. Rank: 340 (56)

 

245 (25) COLLINWOOD ; Rating:  0.855 ; Power: 83.19 ; Sched. Rank: 335 (52)

 

250 (26) JELLICO ; Rating:  0.841 ; Power: 83.09 ; Sched. Rank: 262 (12)

 

253 (27) McEWEN ; Rating:  0.835 ; Power: 82.78 ; Sched. Rank: 314 (38)

 

255 (28) CORNERSVILLE ; Rating:  0.827 ; Power: 88.67 ; Sched. Rank: 302 (30)

 

261 (29) HUNTLAND ; Rating:  0.808 ; Power: 84.31 ; Sched. Rank: 329 (47)

 

263 (30) LAKE COUNTY (Tiptonville) ; Rating:  0.806 ; Power: 81.85 ; Sched. Rank: 300 (28)

 

264 (31) OAKDALE ; Rating:  0.804 ; Power: 81.02 ; Sched. Rank: 332 (50)

 

266 (32) SOUTH FULTON ; Rating:  0.800 ; Power: 84.45 ; Sched. Rank: 263 (13)

 

273 (33) JO BYRNS (Cedar Hill) ; Rating:  0.768 ; Power: 81.52 ; Sched. Rank: 304 (32)

 

287 (34) GRACE BAPTIST (Chattanooga) ; Rating:  0.724 ; Power: 79.37 ; Sched. Rank: 339 (55)

 

291 (35) CLARKSVILLE ACADEMY ; Rating:  0.702 ; Power: 77.54 ; Sched. Rank: 233 (4)

 

292 (36) MONTEREY ; Rating:  0.692 ; Power: 78.95 ; Sched. Rank: 301 (29)

 

298 (37) GRACE CHRISTIAN (Franklin) ; Rating:  0.662 ; Power: 81.89 ; Sched. Rank: 324 (42)

 

301 (38) COPPER BASIN (Copperhill) ; Rating:  0.642 ; Power: 74.70 ; Sched. Rank: 310 (34)

 

304 (39) HANCOCK COUNTY (Sneedville) ; Rating:  0.628 ; Power: 75.79 ; Sched. Rank: 341 (57)

 

309 (40) MOORE COUNTY (Lynchburg) ; Rating:  0.612 ; Power: 75.37 ; Sched. Rank: 303 (31)

 

313 (41) GREENFIELD ; Rating:  0.600 ; Power: 72.85 ; Sched. Rank: 307 (33)

 

317 (42) PERRY COUNTY (Linden) ; Rating:  0.578 ; Power: 70.27 ; Sched. Rank: 272 (16)

 

319 (43) RED BOILING SPRINGS ; Rating:  0.565 ; Power: 71.06 ; Sched. Rank: 320 (40)

 

320 (44) SUNBRIGHT ; Rating:  0.546 ; Power: 69.62 ; Sched. Rank: 223 (3)

 

322 (45) WEST CARROLL (Atwood) ; Rating:  0.537 ; Power: 72.05 ; Sched. Rank: 254 (7)

 

324 (46) BOOKER T. WASHINGTON (Memphis) ; Rating:  0.507 ; Power: 65.47 ; Sched. Rank: 258 (9)

 

325 (47) MT. PLEASANT ; Rating:  0.503 ; Power: 71.63 ; Sched. Rank: 294 (25)

 

329 (48) RICHLAND (Lynnville) ; Rating:  0.436 ; Power: 67.81 ; Sched. Rank: 319 (39)

 

330 (49) CLAY COUNTY (Celina) ; Rating:  0.431 ; Power: 63.42 ; Sched. Rank: 293 (24)

 

331 (50) MIDDLETON ; Rating:  0.429 ; Power: 58.49 ; Sched. Rank: 290 (23)

 

334 (51) HOUSTON COUNTY (Erin) ; Rating:  0.423 ; Power: 66.02 ; Sched. Rank: 287 (21)

 

335 (52) LOOKOUT VALLEY (Chattanooga) ; Rating:  0.403 ; Power: 62.55 ; Sched. Rank: 260 (11)

 

337 (53) SALE CREEK ; Rating:  0.337 ; Power: 54.75 ; Sched. Rank: 328 (46)

 

338 (54) PICKETT COUNTY (Byrdstown) ; Rating:  0.336 ; Power: 58.04 ; Sched. Rank: 266 (14)

 

340 (55) UNAKA (Elizabethton) ; Rating:  0.320 ; Power: 54.47 ; Sched. Rank: 327 (45)

 

341 (56) GLEASON ; Rating:  0.290 ; Power: 52.39 ; Sched. Rank: 268 (15)

 

343 (57) CONCORD CHRISTIAN (Knoxville) ; Rating:  0.186 ; Power: 45.23 ; Sched. Rank: 334 (51)

What kind of mess is this? I garuntee you this pole isnt near as accurate as my buddy Murphy. You got those Jasperlites ranked #51 and Griders team #88. Did you not no Grider beat them? You think im joking but im not.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What kind of mess is this? I garuntee you this pole isnt near as accurate as my buddy Murphy. You got those Jasperlites ranked #51 and Griders team #88. Did you not no Grider beat them? You think im joking but im not.

 

Very true, but it was a 7 point game that could have gone either way and most likely would go the other way if the two teams met again.  Truly it's the schedule strength that is bringing South Pittsburg down lower than Marion.  I would love to see your boy Murphy's rankings, however, they never seem to be accessible.  I post here, Sonny Moore posts on his website, where is the master of Tennessee's rankings posted?  Not trying to take a shot, but it just seems as though his rankings aren't transparent nor accessible.  I would love to compare and truly see what goes into his rankings.  Much love to Sonny Moore as he has a very respected power rating system and I guarantee he would say the same about the LazIndex.  Where can we see Murphy Fair and what measurable data goes into his rankings?  Just for reference, he hasn't posted his rankings yet this week, but going into this week Sonny Moore had Marion at 62 and South Pittsburg at 122. 

Edited by LazIndexTN
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very true, but it was a 7 point game that could have gone either way and most likely would go the other way if the two teams met again. Truly it's the schedule strength that is bringing South Pittsburg down lower than Marion. I would love to see your boy Murphy's rankings, however, they never seem to be accessible. I post here, Sonny Moore posts on his website, where is the master of Tennessee's rankings posted? Not trying to take a shot, but it just seems as though his rankings aren't transparent nor accessible. I would love to compare and truly see what goes into his rankings. Much love to Sonny Moore as he has a very respected power rating system and I guarantee he would say the same about the LazIndex. Where can we see Murphy Fair and what measurable data goes into his rankings? Just for reference, he hasn't posted his rankings yet this week, but going into this week Sonny Moore had Marion at 62 and South Pittsburg at 122.

I wonder too where Murphy Fair gets his data and what he uses for his preseason book he puts out. A lot leaves you scratching your head. Is he from the Chattanooga area?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder too where Murphy Fair gets his data and what he uses for his preseason book he puts out. A lot leaves you scratching your head. Is he from the Chattanooga area?

All coaches are sent a form to fill out with a breakdown of their team. He also keeps up with the top teams from year to year and who they return and lose, the rest is just instinct
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very true, but it was a 7 point game that could have gone either way and most likely would go the other way if the two teams met again. Truly it's the schedule strength that is bringing South Pittsburg down lower than Marion. I would love to see your boy Murphy's rankings, however, they never seem to be accessible. I post here, Sonny Moore posts on his website, where is the master of Tennessee's rankings posted? Not trying to take a shot, but it just seems as though his rankings aren't transparent nor accessible. I would love to compare and truly see what goes into his rankings. Much love to Sonny Moore as he has a very respected power rating system and I guarantee he would say the same about the LazIndex. Where can we see Murphy Fair and what measurable data goes into his rankings? Just for reference, he hasn't posted his rankings yet this week, but going into this week Sonny Moore had Marion at 62 and South Pittsburg at 122.

I garuntee you are full of mess. Them Jasperlites got a lawyer to get that mcqueen boy to not play that night. If Grider played them again with that mcqueen boy it would be worse. That Peek mans defence shut down that Mathis mans offence. Im not telling you either how Murphy has such a good pole. He is the guru. You think im joking but im not.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All coaches are sent a form to fill out with a breakdown of their team. He also keeps up with the top teams from year to year and who they return and lose, the rest is just instinct

 

Seems great for a preseason poll, kind of like the opening poll in the NCAA.  Great information, but not worth anything after a game has been played.  I just don't like that I have to pay a subscription to basically an opinionated poll when I could get actually analytical and statistical data for free based off of actual game results. 

 

If I am wrong about it being an opinion poll by one human than please inform me otherwise, but thus far that is all I have been told/shown about his poll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems great for a preseason poll, kind of like the opening poll in the NCAA. Great information, but not worth anything after a game has been played. I just don't like that I have to pay a subscription to basically an opinionated poll when I could get actually analytical and statistical data for free based off of actual game results.

 

If I am wrong about it being an opinion poll by one human than please inform me otherwise, but thus far that is all I have been told/shown about his poll.

All poles are meaningless, all they're good for is to get all of us fans fighting. WC has won games big that they should have lost on paper and lost games big they were picked to win on paper, that's why they're played on a field and not on paper. Thanks for all you do Edited by wildcat89
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All poles are meaningless, all they're good for is to get all of us fans fighting. WC has won games big that they should have lost on paper and lost games big they were picked to win on paper, that's why they're played on a field and not on paper. Thanks for all you do

 

Yep, your boys really put it on Huntingdon this weekend.  Thought it would at least be a little bit better of a game.  Had that game as a 4 or 5 point spread going in, definitely think everyone was surprised by the 20 point dismantling.  Any given Friday, which is why football is such a great game!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems great for a preseason poll, kind of like the opening poll in the NCAA. Great information, but not worth anything after a game has been played. I just don't like that I have to pay a subscription to basically an opinionated poll when I could get actually analytical and statistical data for free based off of actual game results.

 

If I am wrong about it being an opinion poll by one human than please inform me otherwise, but thus far that is all I have been told/shown about his poll.

I garuntee you I take my Murphy Fair book to all the games so I can read in it. Murphy is the only person that writes a book every year about all these boys. I just was looking at your pole and you had that Mathis man ranked way above Grider. Obviously you didnt watch that have cause Griders team shut them down after the lawyer made the phone call so that mcqueen boy couldnt play. You think im joking but im not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


×
  • Create New...