Jump to content


Why login?

  • It's free
  • Participate in the discussions
  • Contribute schedules, rosters and scores
  • Hide the advertising on the message boards by becoming a Plus member
  • Welcome to CoachT.com!

    You can't become a part of our great high school sports community without logging in!

    Regular visitors will tell you: they love keeping up with teams outside their own area. That only happens when we share information here on CoachT.com!

    Don't have an account? It only takes a second to create one, and it's even easier with a Facebook or Twitter account!
    Photo

    LazIndex 1A Rankings & Predictions Semifinals


    • Please log in to reply
    29 replies to this topic

    #1 LazIndexTN

    LazIndexTN

      Challenger

    • Members
    • 612 posts

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    1A

    34 (1) GREENBACK ; Rating:  1.562 ; Power: 118.97 ; Sched. Rank: 224 (3)

     

    46 (2) DRESDEN ; Rating:  1.476 ; Power: 118.34 ; Sched. Rank: 311 (32)

     

    63 (3) WAYNE COUNTY (Waynesboro) ; Rating:  1.424 ; Power: 109.40 ; Sched. Rank: 297 (23)

     

    65 (4) SOUTH PITTSBURG ; Rating:  1.417 ; Power: 114.16 ; Sched. Rank: 282 (19)

     

    83 (5) COALFIELD ; Rating:  1.343 ; Power: 108.65 ; Sched. Rank: 259 (7)

     

    103 (6) UNION CITY ; Rating:  1.272 ; Power: 107.22 ; Sched. Rank: 288 (21)

     

    114 (7) NASHVILLE CHRISTIAN ; Rating:  1.235 ; Power: 104.58 ; Sched. Rank: 274 (14)

     

    121 (8) HUNTINGDON ; Rating:  1.215 ; Power: 107.68 ; Sched. Rank: 253 (5)

     

    128 (9) ONEIDA ; Rating:  1.155 ; Power: 97.83 ; Sched. Rank: 181 (1)

     

    133 (10) COLUMBIA ACADEMY ; Rating:  1.130 ; Power: 95.07 ; Sched. Rank: 324 (44)

     

    156 (11) HARRIMAN ; Rating:  1.071 ; Power: 98.08 ; Sched. Rank: 269 (12)

     

    165 (12) TROUSDALE COUNTY (Hartsville) ; Rating:  1.047 ; Power: 94.85 ; Sched. Rank: 316 (36)

     

    168 (13) PEABODY (Trenton) ; Rating:  1.037 ; Power: 95.59 ; Sched. Rank: 268 (11)

     

    176 (14) GORDONSVILLE ; Rating:  1.013 ; Power: 91.94 ; Sched. Rank: 294 (22)

     

    181 (15) FAYETTEVILLE ; Rating:  0.998 ; Power: 93.02 ; Sched. Rank: 327 (47)

     

    193 (16) HUMBOLDT ; Rating:  0.968 ; Power: 94.02 ; Sched. Rank: 262 (9)

     

    197 (17) MIDWAY (Kingston) ; Rating:  0.958 ; Power: 96.17 ; Sched. Rank: 284 (20)

     

    198 (18) MIDDLE TN CHRISTIAN (Murfreesboro) ; Rating:  0.957 ; Power: 91.79 ; Sched. Rank: 317 (37)

     

    206 (19) CLOUDLAND (Roan Mountain) ; Rating:  0.930 ; Power: 93.32 ; Sched. Rank: 215 (2)

     

    220 (20) KIPP COLLEGIATE (Memphis) ; Rating:  0.889 ; Power: 89.98 ; Sched. Rank: 335 (53)

     

    225 (21) WHITWELL ; Rating:  0.863 ; Power: 88.48 ; Sched. Rank: 278 (17)

     

    232 (22) SUMMERTOWN ; Rating:  0.841 ; Power: 82.46 ; Sched. Rank: 337 (55)

     

    234 (23) McEWEN ; Rating:  0.836 ; Power: 83.65 ; Sched. Rank: 323 (43)

     

    246 (24) SOUTH FULTON ; Rating:  0.798 ; Power: 85.18 ; Sched. Rank: 300 (24)

     

    248 (25) HOLLOW ROCK-BRUCETON CENTRAL ; Rating:  0.792 ; Power: 79.91 ; Sched. Rank: 308 (30)

     

    250 (26) COLLINWOOD ; Rating:  0.780 ; Power: 81.28 ; Sched. Rank: 310 (31)

     

    256 (27) JELLICO ; Rating:  0.772 ; Power: 80.24 ; Sched. Rank: 257 (6)

     

    259 (28) LAKE COUNTY (Tiptonville) ; Rating:  0.764 ; Power: 82.83 ; Sched. Rank: 303 (25)

     

    264 (29) OAKDALE ; Rating:  0.754 ; Power: 78.67 ; Sched. Rank: 333 (51)

     

    269 (30) CORNERSVILLE ; Rating:  0.743 ; Power: 83.95 ; Sched. Rank: 314 (34)

     

    270 (31) JO BYRNS (Cedar Hill) ; Rating:  0.742 ; Power: 78.31 ; Sched. Rank: 319 (39)

     

    272 (32) MEMPHIS MIDDLE COLLEGE ; Rating:  0.733 ; Power: 79.32 ; Sched. Rank: 341 (57)

     

    277 (33) HUNTLAND ; Rating:  0.724 ; Power: 80.85 ; Sched. Rank: 330 (50)

     

    281 (34) CLARKSVILLE ACADEMY ; Rating:  0.698 ; Power: 78.58 ; Sched. Rank: 277 (16)

     

    286 (35) GRACE BAPTIST (Chattanooga) ; Rating:  0.667 ; Power: 78.83 ; Sched. Rank: 325 (45)

     

    294 (36) MONTEREY ; Rating:  0.615 ; Power: 75.38 ; Sched. Rank: 313 (33)

     

    300 (37) HANCOCK COUNTY (Sneedville) ; Rating:  0.585 ; Power: 74.32 ; Sched. Rank: 339 (56)

     

    305 (38) GRACE CHRISTIAN (Franklin) ; Rating:  0.581 ; Power: 78.80 ; Sched. Rank: 326 (46)

     

    307 (39) GREENFIELD ; Rating:  0.573 ; Power: 73.66 ; Sched. Rank: 280 (18)

     

    309 (40) MOORE COUNTY (Lynchburg) ; Rating:  0.561 ; Power: 71.78 ; Sched. Rank: 328 (48)

     

    314 (41) SUNBRIGHT ; Rating:  0.548 ; Power: 70.42 ; Sched. Rank: 227 (4)

     

    315 (42) COPPER BASIN (Copperhill) ; Rating:  0.544 ; Power: 72.37 ; Sched. Rank: 306 (28)

     

    319 (43) PERRY COUNTY (Linden) ; Rating:  0.507 ; Power: 68.33 ; Sched. Rank: 275 (15)

     

    321 (44) RED BOILING SPRINGS ; Rating:  0.491 ; Power: 66.90 ; Sched. Rank: 320 (40)

     

    322 (45) WEST CARROLL (Atwood) ; Rating:  0.476 ; Power: 71.45 ; Sched. Rank: 266 (10)

     

    325 (46) MIDDLETON ; Rating:  0.415 ; Power: 60.16 ; Sched. Rank: 305 (27)

     

    326 (47) CLAY COUNTY (Celina) ; Rating:  0.408 ; Power: 61.33 ; Sched. Rank: 318 (38)

     

    329 (48) BOOKER T. WASHINGTON (Memphis) ; Rating:  0.398 ; Power: 62.58 ; Sched. Rank: 271 (13)

     

    330 (49) MT. PLEASANT ; Rating:  0.398 ; Power: 67.86 ; Sched. Rank: 315 (35)

     

    332 (50) RICHLAND (Lynnville) ; Rating:  0.350 ; Power: 65.19 ; Sched. Rank: 329 (49)

     

    334 (51) HOUSTON COUNTY (Erin) ; Rating:  0.340 ; Power: 63.44 ; Sched. Rank: 304 (26)

     

    335 (52) SALE CREEK ; Rating:  0.329 ; Power: 54.83 ; Sched. Rank: 336 (54)

     

    336 (53) LOOKOUT VALLEY (Chattanooga) ; Rating:  0.312 ; Power: 59.78 ; Sched. Rank: 307 (29)

     

    337 (54) GLEASON ; Rating:  0.275 ; Power: 55.17 ; Sched. Rank: 261 (8)

     

    338 (55) UNAKA (Elizabethton) ; Rating:  0.270 ; Power: 53.39 ; Sched. Rank: 321 (41)

     

    339 (56) PICKETT COUNTY (Byrdstown) ; Rating:  0.245 ; Power: 53.94 ; Sched. Rank: 322 (42)

     

    343 (57) CONCORD CHRISTIAN (Knoxville) ; Rating:  0.152 ; Power: 45.84 ; Sched. Rank: 334 (52)

     

     

    Predictions

    GREENBACK over SOUTH PITTSBURG by 4.8

     

    DRESDEN over WAYNE COUNTY (Waynesboro) by 8.9


    • 0

    #2 Southtowner

    Southtowner

      Record Holder

    • CoachT+
    • 3,004 posts

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    1A

    34 (1) GREENBACK ; Rating:  1.562 ; Power: 118.97 ; Sched. Rank: 224 (3)

     

    46 (2) DRESDEN ; Rating:  1.476 ; Power: 118.34 ; Sched. Rank: 311 (32)

     

    63 (3) WAYNE COUNTY (Waynesboro) ; Rating:  1.424 ; Power: 109.40 ; Sched. Rank: 297 (23)

     

    65 (4) SOUTH PITTSBURG ; Rating:  1.417 ; Power: 114.16 ; Sched. Rank: 282 (19)

     

     

     

    Predictions

    GREENBACK over SOUTH PITTSBURG by 4.8

     

    DRESDEN over WAYNE COUNTY (Waynesboro) by 8.9

     

    does your analysis compute home field or is this just a head to head neutral field match up?


    • 0
    South Pittsburg Pirates

    #3 rlh

    rlh

      Most Valuable Player

    • CoachT+
    • 7,631 posts

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    does your analysis compute home field or is this just a head to head neutral field match up?

    His computer is broken.


    • 0


    #4 Southtowner

    Southtowner

      Record Holder

    • CoachT+
    • 3,004 posts

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    His computer is broken.

     

    lol

     

    I'm thinking his analysis doesn't compute for home field. If so I would like to know how much. 


    • 0
    South Pittsburg Pirates

    #5 RudyWasOffsides

    RudyWasOffsides

      Champion

    • Members
    • 2,277 posts

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    He was 8-0 last week in 1A and 2A so I'd say he's on to something. Just my observation from afar.
    • 0

    #6 LazIndexTN

    LazIndexTN

      Challenger

    • Members
    • 612 posts

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    He was 8-0 last week in 1A and 2A so I'd say he's on to something. Just my observation from afar.


    Thank you for the recognition! Much appreciated.
    • 0

    #7 LazIndexTN

    LazIndexTN

      Challenger

    • Members
    • 612 posts

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    lol
     
    I'm thinking his analysis doesn't compute for home field. If so I would like to know how much.


    Home field in high school has equated to less than half a point on average. Granted some teams do play upwards of 2 to 2.5 points better at home, but some play 2 points worse at home. The average difference the past two seasons in TN has been just under 0.5 points for home field so I don't factor it in for high school.

    For all of college football (NAIA, D1, D2, and D3) home field home field is typically a little over 2 points and the NFL is traditionally around 3 points.
    • 0

    #8 RudyWasOffsides

    RudyWasOffsides

      Champion

    • Members
    • 2,277 posts

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Thank you for the recognition! Much appreciated.

    Not a problem. I appreciate what you do for FREE. I enjoy checking every week to see what you've came up with. Your predictions are correct way more times than not. No one could possibly predict everything correct but these guys look to Hammer you every time something is slightly off.
    • 0

    #9 willie2888

    willie2888

      Competitor

    • Members
    • 490 posts

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    where is Laz


    Edited by willie2888, 2 weeks ago.

    • 0

    Us Against The World!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


    #10 LazIndexTN

    LazIndexTN

      Challenger

    • Members
    • 612 posts

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    where is Laz


    Right here Willie, lol
    • 0




    Spirit Style Chooser: