Jump to content

#1 Bradley Central vs #2 Cleveland


JBoskenUSAW
 Share

Recommended Posts

maybe the cleveland coach can jump in, but if they believe they are at least a number two team in the state, and I bet they are set on the premise that they are really number one in the state, they will be on the opposite side of the bracket of Bradley.   And they would already be separated and thus no need to put their guys on the mat at all.  I think they would be separated based on coming from the same region.

 

Same for Bradley.  they would have wrestled twice already this year and potentially a third time should they get to the duals championship.

 

Anyway, it will be fun to see and I look forward to seeing how it all wrestles out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's going to be hard to surpass the Cleveland duals match. The unexpected (except I'd say for the Cleveland team ) happened. And it happened more than once during the match. The action was awesome. I think it will be hard for all the things that happened for Cleveland to happen for them again. I hope everyone is healthy ready to go. Bradley fans I know are dying for this rematch. And the young Raider team is looking to prove it wasn't a fluke. One thing is for sure it will be way more exciting than watching the confirmation hearings. Good luck to all.

Far as I know, Trey is the only one that's injured and a no go for the matchup. Pretty sure I heard them saying Eathan was 100% healthy and ready to go now. Hope that arena is rocking!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possible matchups for tonight's showdown:

 

106 - #4 W. Devaney - BC   vs   G. Stevison - Cle

113 - #1 T. Hicks - BC  vs  #4 G. Bowers - Cle

120 - G. Hughes - BC  vs  #3 B. Pond - Cle

126 - #2 E. Anderson - BC  vs  J. Mullin - Cle

132 - #2 R. Mcelhaney - BC  vs  #1 C. Landers - Cle

138 - A. Robinson - BC  vs  #5 C. Matthews - Cle

145 - #1 Knox Fuller - BC  vs  #5 L. Whiteside - Cle

152 - #3 A. Matthews - BC  vs  A. Sweeney - Cle

160 - #2 C. Adkins - BC  vs  S. Eachus - Cle

170 - J Headrick - BC  vs  D. Jones - Cle

182 - #5 E. Elkins - BC  vs  #3 J. Hicks - Cle

195 - K. Gentry - BC  vs  J. Strickland - Cle

220 - D. Gibson - BC  vs  #5 S. Garcia - Cle

285 - C. Cash - BC  vs #6 T. Shelton - Cle

 

bold - ranked wrestlers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possible matchups for tonight's showdown:

 

106 - #4 W. Devaney - BC vs G. Stevison - Cle

113 - #1 T. Hicks - BC vs #4 G. Bowers - Cle

120 - G. Hughes - BC vs #3 B. Pond - Cle

126 - #2 E. Anderson - BC vs J. Mullin - Cle

132 - #2 R. Mcelhaney - BC vs #1 C. Landers - Cle

138 - A. Robinson - BC vs #5 C. Matthews - Cle

145 - #1 Knox Fuller - BC vs #5 L. Whiteside - Cle

152 - #3 A. Matthews - BC vs A. Sweeney - Cle

160 - #2 C. Adkins - BC vs S. Eachus - Cle

170 - J Headrick - BC vs D. Jones - Cle

182 - #5 E. Elkins - BC vs #3 J. Hicks - Cle

195 - K. Gentry - BC vs J. Strickland - Cle

220 - D. Gibson - BC vs #5 S. Garcia - Cle

285 - C. Cash - BC vs #6 T. Shelton - Cle

 

bold - ranked wrestlers

106- BC

113- BC

120- CLE

126- BC

132- CLE

138- CLE

145- BC

152- BC

160- BC

170- CLE

182- CLE

195- BC

220- CLE

285- CLE

 

7 matches apiece. Will come down to bonus points!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

106- BC

113- BC

120- CLE

126- BC

132- CLE

138- CLE

145- BC

152- BC

160- BC

170- CLE

182- CLE

195- BC

220- CLE

285- CLE

 

7 matches apiece. Will come down to bonus points!

As bad as I hate to say this. I believe the outcome will be on what TJ and Knox does. Both has got to get a pin. With Trey out, I could see Pond getting a pin at 120. Mc has got to get it together. He isn't a 2 time state champ for nothing. Something is wrong with that young man this year. He isn't the same wrestler as the past 2 years. Our lighter weights are gonna have to step up big. Upper weights I do believe Cleveland will own us there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • McKenzie had no trouble with Huntingdon.  
    • Has BA landed any cornfed cowboys to block up front?
    • Yea I agree I will say tho I was a big “ v “ fan if an  opening ever did happen I think it would’ve been good to see him have a shot coming from a power house like Oakland. I’m sure he’s learned a lot from Kevin.  I bet he would bring a really good offense scheme IMO But after all this I just dunno anymore.  Whatever happens with the rumors an such if it did come to and opening I think this messes it all up.  The board members dreams are slowly slipping away now. I haven’t lived there for awhile I just hear what I hear, but my question is would there be any good potential candidates?? That’s why I don’t understand why people want b s out so bad who else could do any better ?? IMO there’s nothing attractive about it? As I stated earlier I went to the last game last year and taking a leak in a porta Potty is pretty sad and still nothing being done they say .. 
    • I have a sophomore that can do 177 (preferred) or 192. Sent you an email.
    • speaking of board members how can a man get arrested 12 days ago and still be head coaching a team in TC school system? looks like your right about the tc board members. I bet it would be different if they had a kid on the team 
×
  • Create New...