Jump to content

Bracket Busters


WrestlingGod
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So i tried to only use unranked guys. With the exception of 1 or 2.

 

106- Chase Bridgford (Ind), Cal Rogers (Tull)

 

113- David Medina (Riv), Gavin Schoeberl (Ind)

 

120- Bristin Hulsey (Beech), William Witt (CaRi)

 

126- Austin Plumlee (MJ), Carson Helton (StCr)

 

132- Daniel Bradford (Blk), Jalen Henry (MJ)

 

138- Nicholas Freeman (Rav), Harrison Phillips (Arl)

 

145- Steven Weist (MJ), Jared Harter (TN)

 

152- Cade Young (Hou), John Bonee (Tull)

 

160- Ndayambaje John (Kbry), Joseph Garrett (Beech)

 

170- Logan Branham (Vol), Dylan Jones (Clev)

 

182- Aaron Moore (Arl), Bradley Williams (Clk)

 

195- Denzel Medina (Sc), Jamal Miller (Mcgv)

 

220- Craig Barbour (Nw), Alan Roaten (Arl)

 

285- Christopher Cash (Bc), Elijah Holcomb (Ckv)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bump, I liked several of your bracket buster picks. You made it difficult to offer 2 more so I'm gonna offer just one in most wgts in addition to your two.

 

106- Thomas(Summ) and Seeley(SH)

113- Pendley(TN)

120- Nielson(Halls)

126- Kligensmith(Summ)

132- Lundy(EH) and Schnedler(Indy) disclaimer: Lundy prob shouldn't qualify as a bracket buster but he did finish third in his region so I'm taking him. :)

138-Can't disagree with Phillips(Arl) or Freeman(Rave).

145- Harter(TN) and Teaster(Heri) I Think Teaster could possibly be in finals if he was in the bottom side of the bracket!

152- Brown(Leb) I liked the Bonee(Tull) pick as well.

160- Strong(HL)I really like the Garrett(Beech) pick!

170- Maynor(SD)

182- Carney(Summ) IMO, you took the best two with Moore(Arl) and Williams(Clk).

195- Settles(SD) you took the best two again with Medina(SH) and Miller(McG)

220- Scott(TN) Bump, you're pretty good at picking the big guys. Roaten(Arl) and Barbour(NW) should do well.

285- Ellis(SevCo) and Salyers(DB) may surprise some people. They're not beating Boykin or "Little" Kramer but I think everyone else may be fair game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed, was actually debating Henderson and Kligensmith. Even though Henderson has whipped him a couple times, I chose Kligensmith bc I liked his side of the bracket better aside from his first rd match with Helton and they're not wrestling each other. Actually think both will surprise some people this weekend.

Edited by FargoStrut
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bump, I liked several of your bracket buster picks. You made it difficult to offer 2 more so I'm gonna offer just one in most wgts in addition to your two.

 

106- Thomas(Summ) and Seeley(SH)

113- Pendley(TN)

120- Nielson(Halls)

126- Kligensmith(Summ)

132- Lundy(EH) and Schnedler(Indy) disclaimer: Lundy prob shouldn't qualify as a bracket buster but he did finish third in his region so I'm taking him. :)

138-Can't disagree with Phillips(Arl) or Freeman(Rave).

145- Harter(TN) and Teaster(Heri) I Think Teaster could possibly be in finals if he was in the bottom side of the bracket!

152- Brown(Leb) I liked the Bonee(Tull) pick as well.

160- Strong(HL)I really like the Garrett(Beech) pick!

170- Maynor(SD)

182- Carney(Summ) IMO, you took the best two with Moore(Arl) and Williams(Clk).

195- Settles(SD) you took the best two again with Medina(SH) and Miller(McG)

220- Scott(TN) Bump, you're pretty good at picking the big guys. Roaten(Arl) and Barbour(NW) should do well.

285- Ellis(SevCo) and Salyers(DB) may surprise some people. They're not beating Boykin or "Little" Kramer but I think everyone else may be fair game.

why thank you sir. I couldbe listed 5 for each weight. Theres probably 10-12 guys at each weight who could medal. Its a loaded field
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • As I said somewhere earlier in the thread, the original plans had no outdoor athletic facilities being part of the campus.  The original plan was for HVA to use facilities at nearby schools.  Very late in the process they came up with a plan and found budget to have minimal facilities and crammed them in to space that never was intended for athletic facilities.  
    • Agreed, the way the field is turned you get the evening sun blasting right into the press box making filming a nightmare there, plus its so low.  The field is land locked and parking is a nightmare too. Seems like Knox County could have done a lot better there with the design and the quality. 
    • I think this upcoming team may be pretty good, they will definately be better up front and if they can replace Dozier, Heyward and Rembert, they can be real good. They have the same strange schedule, but this time with 5 straight home games. The road games at Jeff County, Powell will be tough to open up with and the back side at Bearden is the tough game there.  One question I had if anyone knows: There has been some talk of an indoor practice facility in the past, with the new track area now more of a track area, that kind of leaves a need for a football practice area. Just sayin....
    • I find it hard to believe that 70% of a schools enrollment is zoned for another school district
    • I was told that the indoor facility is happening regardless of the vote on the taxes but it would be a much bigger project with more funds if they vote goes through
×
  • Create New...