Jump to content

COLUMBIA ACADEMY VS WAVERLY 2A QUARTERFINALS


BulldawgsRise
 Share

Recommended Posts

ok- WHAT A GAME

CA had the skill players to match up with Waverly and they physically controlled the trenches. Waverly still got 34, many on 1st play from scrimmage type plays, cos they are that good also. 

CA almost blew it near the end of the 1st half. They scored too fast and Wavelry of course scored in 1 play and had all the momentum at halftime. CA had absolutely controlled the game and only had a 6 point lead. 

Those 2 hour bus rides will git you and I have seen Forrest on the receiving end of a whoopin after a long travel distance. 

Both teams were outstanding. Waverly is a force to be reckoned with and should be proud of their year. And what a turnout on that side. Wow!!!!

I will say that my opinion of CA has changed for the better over time. I dont see them as an elitist private school. If there could be such a thing, they are almost a blue collar private. Their cheer kids i think work with a parent. Everything is done well but I know there is a lot of parent time donated to making things run right. Youth and middle school football has been up and down. I wish them well in the future. I think there are good people there. 

Again, hats off to both teams. I hope #11 is ok. He is a great friggin athlete and so fun to watch. 

CA has what it takes to win Gold. If you can't admit that by now you are delusional.     

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, GeneralAmerigha said:

ok- WHAT A GAME

CA had the skill players to match up with Waverly and they physically controlled the trenches. Waverly still got 34, many on 1st play from scrimmage type plays, cos they are that good also. 

CA almost blew it near the end of the 1st half. They scored too fast and Wavelry of course scored in 1 play and had all the momentum at halftime. CA had absolutely controlled the game and only had a 6 point lead. 

Those 2 hour bus rides will git you and I have seen Forrest on the receiving end of a whoopin after a long travel distance. 

Both teams were outstanding. Waverly is a force to be reckoned with and should be proud of their year. And what a turnout on that side. Wow!!!!

I will say that my opinion of CA has changed for the better over time. I dont see them as an elitist private school. If there could be such a thing, they are almost a blue collar private. Their cheer kids i think work with a parent. Everything is done well but I know there is a lot of parent time donated to making things run right. Youth and middle school football has been up and down. I wish them well in the future. I think there are good people there. 

Again, hats off to both teams. I hope #11 is ok. He is a great friggin athlete and so fun to watch. 

CA has what it takes to win Gold. If you can't admit that by now you are delusional.     

 

I hate that he got injured on a gimmick play.   That game would of definitely been different if that play hadn't of happened.   Not saying Waverly would of won, but they were totally one dimensional once he went out and became very easy to defend with the wild cat package.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, FreeAgent11 said:

I hate that he got injured on a gimmick play.   That game would of definitely been different if that play hadn't of happened.   Not saying Waverly would of won, but they were totally one dimensional once he went out and became very easy to defend with the wild cat package.

The gimmick play hurt him, but the non-called roughing the passer knocked him out of the game. But I do agree that play should of never been tried. I was saying that in the stands as it was being performed. 

Edited by rednecktiger31
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, rednecktiger31 said:

The gimmick play hurt him, but the non-called roughing the passer knocked him out of the game. But I do agree that play should of never been tried. I was saying that in the stands as it was being performed. 

The last play he was way outside the pocket if I recall, and becomes a runner, and roughing the passer becomes much more difficult to call.  It wasn't even roughing the passer, in my opinion.  he got hit as he was releasing the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/18/2017 at 10:34 AM, Atlas said:

Shameful a Trenton fan wanting UC to lose to a non region 7 team. 

You guys would do the same.  Some of the remarks you guys made about our 2015 team was not called for.  Get over it.  We respect your program.  And if you guys win it all, good for you and the region.  Be safe and injury free

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From D'Stew.

Columbia Academy
Offense- Spread T
2017 Offensive Stats- 567 rushes for 3,612 yards and 48 TDs; 75 of 139 passing for 1,091 yards and 14 TDs; 4,703 total yards and 62 total TDs
Run-Pass Ratio- Run-76%, Pass- 24%

Union City
Offense- Flex bone
2017 Offensive Stats-757 rushes for 5,543 yards and 70 TDs; 10 of 26 passing for 205 yards and 3 TDs; 5,748 total yards and 73 TDs
Run-Pass Ratio- Run-96%, Pass- 4%

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/21/2017 at 8:47 AM, rednecktiger31 said:

The gimmick play hurt him, but the non-called roughing the passer knocked him out of the game. But I do agree that play should of never been tried. I was saying that in the stands as it was being performed. 

If I could ever get a picture to load on the message board, I think you would agree from the 2 I have it was not roughing.  Someday, I will figure it out again.  

I hate that he got hurt and had to leave the game, but Im not convinced the outcome would have been any different.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/23/2017 at 4:45 PM, youngod said:

If I could ever get a picture to load on the message board, I think you would agree from the 2 I have it was not roughing.  Someday, I will figure it out again.  

I hate that he got hurt and had to leave the game, but Im not convinced the outcome would have been any different.  

 

Just throwing this out there guys IT dont matter you guys won!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Way late on this post, but I do believe that I want to at least weight in so to speak lol. I wrestled NAIA competed against some of the best wrestler over all a crossed the divisions and felt great about my college wrestling experience. I think people make the mistake in believe that wrestling some how gets easier as a sport at the smaller college divisions it doesn't the training is mostly the same. I have that on good authority from a coach who was a D1 all-American. it's more the commitment level of the competitors that is different. There is talented wrestlers that can go D1 at any level in the smaller division. sub in Sammy Shires for one he would have done fine on a DI team. He chose a work life ratio that suited him. It's not about talent it's commitment are you going to make training and studying the sport the center of your world cause that's what it takes: NO MATTER HOW TALATENTED BEFORE HAND YOU ARE.  If so then D1 is for you and striving for success at that level is for you like Mr. Palmer said it's what your willing to put in. Now coaches if you have a successful wrestler who fits that bill then by all means D1 is a great option they will see some success no matter how small, but if they are not that committed along with being talented and a killer and you know it then your doing them wrong.  You don't have to tell athletes that you don't think they are D1 tell them to keep their options open to take all their visits to consider all the divisions regardless of their goals. college recruiting visits have you most times wrestle against their current wrestlers coaches and athletes  will find out real quick it's not easy no matter where you go. That way when they make their decision it's a sound one that's based on well rounded experiences.     BobCorker, and oceansize42 I believe what you are thinking is correct but for different reasons. TN wrestler's have the talent... it's a commitment level change. TN wrestlers aren't used to having to put themselves through the level of commitment required and kills them on the D1 level.    WrestlingGod, I agree you should push kids to pursue their dreams, but not at the cost of common sense period... we have to much of that going around this country already. Dreams can turn to poison when these wrestler are not educated on what it truly takes. In TN  a kid who understands wrestling to a high level can be successful with small amounts of hard work. They think their definition of hard work is enough for D1 that is the mistake not the "talent/understanding".  Over-all though we do not celebrate NAIA,D2,D3, or Juco success in this state like other states do. GA/AL celebrates all it's college wrestlers success a crossed the  board no matter the division. Why? because it's hard... I have gone to all the divisions National championships let me tell you to be a all-American at any is impressive especially D2 or NAIA. those guys can scrap and not one of those AA's are an easy match. all of them were state placers or champs multiple times in their high school careers. does that at all sound easy to place at? TN does not give those guys enough credit or shout outs period. it's an over sight because of this D1 or it's less than meaningless   mentality on this site and in this state. GA/AL is better then us on the highest stage because they send guys to D2,NAIA,D3 ect. they come back understanding the sport better then their pervious coaches, and give back and that cycles to athletes readiness to go D1 with clearer understanding of what it takes to be competitive day 1 freshman year.             My post isn't to support one way or the other but to just consider that both sides have merit and that both work when the system in TN. by system I mean coaches are the better educated on preparing athletes for each level they want and should pursue.        
    • If you think McKenzie could've beat Riverside I have a bridge you might like to buy. 
    • Hate to hear Ricky is heading to the old folk's home!
    • By recruiting, I mean members of a coaching staff are talking to, meeting with, giving tours, to students, and their guardians, that are not zoned for their school.    there’s no way that many non Bearden kids just showed up all at once without being recruited. It can’t be a coincidence that all those kids also went through the middle school all star game your boss puts on every year. 
    • Not sure how I would put it as recruiting perhaps kids trying to better their career by going to a head coach and coaching staff with connections all over college football that gets them the opportunity to go play college football and be coached by a coach with a pretty good track record.
×
  • Create New...