First of all, to say you have been "nice" is laughable. Secondly, if anybody cared, they could go to the original threads and see where the "false narratives" are really coming from. You came on this thread and reengaged me for no reason other than to be the AP you are. Nobody is making fun of "Walker" but rather your POSTS. You told me I would "find out" who "Walker" was in the game vs. Lausanne. The game was not covered in the local newspaper except for some stats. Walker's name was not mentioned. So I assumed he didn't play. Then you made a comment somewhere about his "season ending injury" so I thought my assumption was correct. But then you started a dialogue somewhere else about his performance in the game? Apparently I wasn't the only one who noticed this contradiction - he played into the 4th quarter of his team's last game game with a "season ending injury." LOL
What is "illogical" or "hypersensitive" about wanting to know what team a player being discussed plays for??? Moreover, if you assert that "Walker" should have been one of the 4 semifinalists, then that IMPLIES that one of the 4 actual semifinalists should not have been. Can you not see that??? Unless you stated that there should have been 5......
BTW, you have liberty to snipe out of the bushes all you want. I'm through responding to somebody who sees nothing wrong with going onto a championship game thread to post that the newly named Mr Football on one team would be the 4th best RB on the opposing team and only the 5th or 6th best RB in his division. Besides, there are other people out there calling you out for your arrogant posts. Have a nice (delusional) life.