I want some opinions from anybody. Does it really make any sense the way the TSSAA does their football classifications by classifying schools according to their enrollments? Why aren't schools classified in football according to how many players are on their varsity rosters? What difference does it make how many students attend a school when, say, only 30 players are on a varsity football roster for a 5A school? You could possibly get a rough estimate a year in advance on how many varsity players a school will have in football and classify according to that. Because there is so much variance in the numbers on the rosters, football is the only sport you could classify this way. It doesn't seem right that you have Maryville with 80-90 varsity players playing in 4A, and then you have a Campbell Co. with 30-40 players playing in 5A, just because Campbell Co. has a higher student enrollment. A very small percentage of the student body plays football anyway. No one can tell me that Maryville does not have an advantage over other 4A schools as far as developing depth, etc. At the same time, 5A schools with 30-40 players such as Campbell Co. are at a huge disadvantage when they play other 5A schools with much larger rosters. In my opinion, schools with the largest varsity rosters should be classified together and on down the line. Any thoughts?