HasBeenHero

While I am hopeful for RB to win, I also have learn to just keep picking Alcoa until they prove me wrong. Red Bank - 13 Alcoa - whatever they want it to be.

Agree to disagree. We had a touchdown called back (rightfully so), a delay of game penalty inside the 10 (maybe 15) in which there was no way we had the full play clock, and some questionable spots near the first down marker that did not go our way. A game is more than just a ratio penalties, but nice attempt.

You must have had a few 'Sodas' again. I thought quite the opposite took place. Nonetheless, great game to RB, we got our shot at Alcoa last year. Can't say I was all that excited to play Alcoa again this year. Best of luck next week. We had a great season this year, team should be proud. As always - HTTR

Redskins 35 Dragons 6 HTTR

If Red Bank is only 13 points better than Loudon while Loudon has 3 key starters out, I wouldn't expect them to give Alcoa much of a game. Also, how does Loudon 'running their mouth' last year have any relevance to 56-0 loss? Regardless of 'running their mouth' or not the score would have been similar to what is was. Alcoa would contend for a championship on a 6A level so don't pretend the playing field is fair.

Sounds like Red Bank is the consensus favorite here. Loudon 28 Red Bank 24 HTTR

Never understood why Englewood folks get their panties in a wad when Central is referred to as Etowah. Not saying you're from Englewood but good lord do they take it personal. From my observation of the local area teams, seems like more often than not the administration is completely okay with mediocre products on the field. If you're a decent player, why go to a program that is rebuilding, why not just go to Greenback, Loudon, Alcoa, Maryville? I guess the question I'm asking is, is Sequoyah losing any talent to other local more successful programs?

Redskins 56 Wildcats 6 HTTR

Loudon good. Sequoyah bad. HTTR

Appreciate the synopsis of the game RS15. Sounds like it was well worth the drive and price of admission. Seems like in game adjustments were needed and made in real time. HTTR and good luck rest of the way Brainerd!

Yes, 3%. I understand math is hard when you are unable to show your own work. Johns Hopkins has been tracking these data for months, please visit the link https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data Again these data can be disputed if you want, but between the two of us, I'm the only one offering solutions. Also, using insults on your initial response is not a strong argument. Please stick to facts when you return.

Per John Hopkins COVID tracker the death rate is around 3%, these data can be manipulated and disputed a number of different ways. I've seen people asymptomatic with the virus and other who can't seem to recover. The politicians are in a tough spot. It is unfortunate it seems like they're more concerned with making a statement politically rather than doing what makes the most sense. To me, what makes the most sense is "informed consent". Just like if you were going into surgery the surgeon would explain the risks (and benefits), you ultimately decided whether you want to inherit the risk or not. We could hash out what this would look like but for the sake of brevity I'll end there.

Rivalry game with one side coming off a loss and the other a win, I would expect LC to bring their "A" game. Not sure it'll be enough, Loudon - 35 LC - 21

Did you join just to make that post?

Should be a good game. If you want to be the best you have to beat the best. GO REDSKINS!