MIDTN

Camden beat Harpeth by 7. Johnson is 0-3 in region play. He has lost twice as a 1 seed to 12AA's 4 and once as a 2 seed to their 3. He's consistant. I don't think it's a lack of talent.

If they do, Ezell might only loose by 20. Otherwise, look for Marshall to hand them a real beating.

Here's a deeper look. Melrose, a better than average team, is averaging 62.95 per game. Against Central they scored 63 per game in two games. Against Millington, they scored 42. Come tourney time, when the rim seems to get smaller, I think that matters. It's not just the average. It's how a team scores against you compared to everyone else they play. I have never seen a team that plays good defense "when they need to".

Perfect!

These teams are ranked by fewest points allowed per game through 2/4/08. Only teams in the CoachT top 25 were considered. 1. McGavock 34.6 2. Brentwood 34.73 3. Millington 35.11 4. Walker Valley 35.96 5. Bartlett 37.82 6. Mt Juliet 38.75 7. Hillsboro 38.85 8. Bearden 38.95 9. Smyrna 39.71 10. Tennessee 39.85 In case you're curious, Memphis Central was 24th at 49.73 per game.

Did Riverdale tip it's hand by holding a player out of last night's game? The rule is clear. So if you know for sure that you're in the clear, why the need to hold the player out? Could it be that when pressed the parents could not prove they had vacated thier old house in accordance with the rule? I read a lot on this thread about people "knowing that she moved". But, by rule, her parents could have moved and still broken the rule. Believe it or not most coaches and ADs don't know that. You have to cut all ties at the old house. This separates the legit relocations from basketball moves. You can't back track and change utility records. No principal or coach wants to deny a player from playing in a game that they are ok to play in. But once there is a question, if they can't prove that they are in compliance and they are allowed to play, the principal is on the hook. Stay tuned.

Look guys, your taking your eyes off the ball. None of this "she said she said" crap matters. Did these two families make a "bona fide" move as described by the TSSAA or not. If they did it is over. If they did not it is VERY easy to prove and Riverdale's year is pretty much over. Ronnie Carter can get thier former addresses and put this to rest with a few hours of work. Ownership records are public and utilities are easy to trace. If those parents tried to have thier cake and eat it too, these kids will suffer. Call Cheatham County and ask if that is true. There, the principal, coach, and AD relied on the parents to do the right thing and it bit them all. They rented a "new" house to get a usuable address and keep the old one. One way or the other, this needs to come to an end for the sake of the players who were already there. NOW!

Here is the question that begs an answer. What are the odds, that not one but two families whose girls played for Independence last year, made a "bona fide" move to Riverdale with the coach? That is to say, that both families just happened to decide to uproot from Williamson County and move to Rutherford County for "non basketball" reasons at the same time, in the same year that thier coach moved. Maybe they found Williamson County schools to be lacking, maybe they all got new jobs and instantly found buyers for thier homes in this "great market", or maybe it is exactly what it looks like. My money is on the last one. Any time a player migrates to a school it makes you wonder, legal or not. Two at the same time is highly questionable and should be looked into. Two players from seperate families with thier coach is beyond belief. Sorry Riverdale,I think you done it.

Recruiting Rule Section 17. The use of undue influence on a student (with or without an athletic record), the parents or guardians of a student by any person connected, or not connected, with the school to secure or to retain a student for athletic purposes shall be a violation of the recruiting rule. You be the judge.

Everyone ever caught is caught this way. Contrary to popular belief, the TSSAA does not have investigaters. They rightly assume that displaced players will rat out cheaters.

Bona Fide Change of Residence ??“ A move from one community to another that justifies a change of schools. Where a family continues to maintain a previous residence for the residential purposes of that family or any of its members, the move is not one that justifies a change of schools for purposes of the TSSAA Bylaws. This is taken directly from the TSSAA hand book. This has been consistently ruled to mean that, if the player in question's family still has utilities in thier name at thier previous house, it is not a "bona fide " move. Just ask Cheatham Co. They had a player that was determined to be maintaining two houses in 04/05. As you can see on this site, they had to forfeit the first 21 games and the player was ineligible for the rest of the season. It doesn't take long to clear a player or thier family. So if this drags out it is not a good sign for Riverdale. It does however, take the TSSAA a while to muster the courage to make a call. Right is right and wrong is wrong.

T.V. news at six last night reported that the TSSAA is looking into a report that Riverdale's two new transfers are living with thier coach. All three came from Independence last year. For those of you who have never dealt with the TSSAA, that means someone has dropped hard facts in thier lap and they are searching for the spine needed to act on them. If true, I hate it for the players who belong at Riverdale. If not, the TSSAA sould clear that team ASAP. Delay hurts all involved.http://www.newschannel5.com/Global/story.asp?S=9677284

Blackman wins by 3. Every once in a while I'm right.

I think this is a trap game for Riverdale. Riverdale should win but very close.

I like Lipscomb by 8 or more.