There is one more thing that should be considered here. The ball is in the glove, and the AWESOME picture appears to show that the ball is in the glove before the runner got to the plate. My question is, did this happen because the runner had to SLOW DOWN because of where the catcher was standing. If the runner did slow down, then that could be interpreted as having her progress impeded. If progress is impeded and there is contact, which is obviously the case, then obstruction should be called. I'm guessing that if the obstruction call had not been made, the offensive coaches and fans would be the ones posting their complaints on here. I just really wish I had been there, as other posters have said. I think I understand both sides of the argument here. We should all remember that all the umpires do is try to get the call correct, and they are not perfect. The call may have been missed, but I would certainly bet that it was not on purpose. How much longer did the game last because of that call? If the umpire simply wanted to go home, would that call have ever crossed his mind. I did look at the Shelbyville paper online and saw that there were THIRTY-TWO hits in the game, but the box score was not listed. Were there any errors? If so, did any of those errors cost either team any runs? If so, then it sounds to me like no one in Wartrace had a perfect night, except for maybe the young lady from Richland who hit the homers in both the 8th and the 9th innings. Wow! At any rate, I think I'll stop writing and just read what everyone else has to say from now on. Thanks.