Most Improved

[nation_supp89]

I asked Mackebee today at practice and he has never played, and certainly has never lost to Siegel's number five. Mackebee has been coming off an almost devastating wrist injury that kept him away from tennis for nearly four months. If he got to play some of the same players at full strength it might swing the other way, but until then we can't really know. The way I see it, your number 5 split sets with Bearden's, who I have seen play and would not put on the same level as anyone in Webb's top 6.

 

why don't you read before you post

 

no one EVER said greer played siegel's number 5...we said he played siegel's number FOUR...and the siegel player won EASILY. I don't care what kind of injury's you have there are no excuses in this sport. Siegel's number 5 is coming off an injury that kept him out of tennis cumulatively for probably have a year and yet siegel's 4 and 5 players beat their 2 and 3 in the district championship doubles match...which shows you that our 2-5 are all very close to one another. Siegel's number SIX split sets with Bearden's number 5, because Siegel's 4 DID NOT play against Bearden...PLEASE get your facts straight before you post

 

shims...how can you say wishing would play 4 at webb when he CRUSHED your current number 2...tadd hatcher...at the carter invitational last year. i doubt tadd has gotten that much better in a year

[-=Cptn.Crunk=-]

why don't you read before you post

 

no one EVER said greer played siegel's number 5...we said he played siegel's number FOUR...and the siegel player won EASILY. I don't care what kind of injury's you have there are no excuses in this sport. Siegel's number 5 is coming off an injury that kept him out of tennis cumulatively for probably have a year and yet siegel's 4 and 5 players beat their 2 and 3 in the district championship doubles match...which shows you that our 2-5 are all very close to one another. Siegel's number SIX split sets with Bearden's number 5, because Siegel's 4 DID NOT play against Bearden...PLEASE get your facts straight before you post

 

shims...how can you say wishing would play 4 at webb when he CRUSHED your current number 2...tadd hatcher...at the carter invitational last year. i doubt tadd has gotten that much better in a year

 

he has man, btw David Parks and Tadd switch out at 2. David and Tadd can both beat, not badly beat, Kyle

[nation_supp89]

he has man, btw David Parks and Tadd switch out at 2. David and Tadd can both beat, not badly beat, Kyle

 

taking into the account the fact that it has been a year, i will not make any predictions about kyle and tadd and i've never seen kyle play parks nor have i really seen parks play so i don't make a comment to that statement. I do know that kyle is AT LEAST at tadd's level...so it is safe to say that kyle would play top 3 at webb

 

what did you mean by "he has man"

[-=Cptn.Crunk=-]

taking into the account the fact that it has been a year, i will not make any predictions about kyle and tadd and i've never seen kyle play parks nor have i really seen parks play so i don't make a comment to that statement. I do know that kyle is AT LEAST at tadd's level...so it is safe to say that kyle would play top 3 at webb

 

what did you mean by "he has man"

 

 

u asked if Tadd has gotten better, and i said "he has man", or woman. I think girls post here as well

[titlebound]

Our #5 has broken his wrist had surgery on it after it was healed from the break and just recently got cortisone injections on that wrist. He has played a total of 3 1/2 months since last May. He also didn't play Rahnema anywhere near full strength so we could use that excuse if we wanted to....but considering those two wont be playing since that is our #5 player its a moot point.

And yes I think David Parks can beat Kyle but not badly but Kyle can also beat him.

[nation_supp89]

u asked if Tadd has gotten better, and i said "he has man", or woman. I think girls post here as well

 

the point i was trying to make was that tadd's gotten better but so has kyle...if kyle beat him so bad last year i think it's safe to say that kyle would beat him this year, it would be different if it would've been closer

 

and when you said "man" you were correct

Edited May 10, 2006 by nation_supp89

[-=Cptn.Crunk=-]

the point i was trying to make was that tadd's gotten better but so has kyle...if kyle beat him so bad last year i think it's safe to say that kyle would beat him this year, it would be different if it would've been closer

 

and when you said "man" you were correct

 

 

they are so close the match can go one way or another, like many other ppl i would like to see them play

[nation_supp89]

they are so close the match can go one way or another, like many other ppl i would like to see them play

 

8-2 is close?

[-=Cptn.Crunk=-]

i saying now the match would be close or closer

[nation_supp89]

i saying now the match would be close or closer

 

one more question...how do you know?

 

for all you know the match could be even more lopsided...you don't just "know" these things unless they play...i think it'd be close to the same but that's just me

[-=Cptn.Crunk=-]

one more question...how do you know?

 

for all you know the match could be even more lopsided...you don't just "know" these things unless they play...i think it'd be close to the same but that's just me

 

 

im GUESSING the match would be close or closer

[nation_supp89]

im GUESSING the match would be close or closer

 

there you go