Jump to content

2006 NBA Draft Lottery


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

2006 NBA Draft

First Round order

 

1. Toronto Raptors

2. Chicago Bulls (via New York)

3. Charlotte Bobcats

4. Portland Trailblazers

5. Atlanta Hawks

6. Minnesota Timberwolves

7. Boston Celtics

8. Houston Rockets

9. Golden State Warriors

10. Seattle SuperSonics

11. Orlando Magic

12. New Orleans Hornets

13. Philadelphia 76ers

14. Utah Jazz

15. New Orleans Hornets (via Bucks)

16. Chicago Bulls

17. Indiana Pacers

18. Washington Wizards

19. Sacramento Kings

20. New York Knicks (via Nuggets)

21. Phoenix Suns (via Lakers)

22. New Jersey Nets (via Clippers)

23. New Jersey Nets

24. Memphis Grizzlies

25. Cleveland Cavaliers

26. L.A. Lakers (via Heat)

27. Phoenix Suns

28. Dallas Mavericks

29. New York Knicks (via Spurs)

30. Portland Trailblazers (via Pistons)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest dare_2_dream

2006 NBA Draft

First Round order

 

1. Toronto Raptors

2. Chicago Bulls (via New York)

3. Charlotte Bobcats

4. Portland Trailblazers

5. Atlanta Hawks

6. Minnesota Timberwolves

7. Boston Celtics

8. Houston Rockets

9. Golden State Warriors

10. Seattle SuperSonics

11. Orlando Magic

12. New Orleans Hornets

13. Philadelphia 76ers

14. Utah Jazz

15. New Orleans Hornets (via Bucks)

16. Chicago Bulls

17. Indiana Pacers

18. Washington Wizards

19. Sacramento Kings

20. New York Knicks (via Nuggets)

21. Phoenix Suns (via Lakers)

22. New Jersey Nets (via Clippers)

23. New Jersey Nets

24. Memphis Grizzlies

25. Cleveland Cavaliers

26. L.A. Lakers (via Heat)

27. Phoenix Suns

28. Dallas Mavericks

29. New York Knicks (via Spurs)

30. Portland Trailblazers (via Pistons)

 

Looks like everyone who was supposed to get a pick got one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest dare_2_dream

Yep,all 30. I was wondering about that, there'd been rumours that all the picks might not be given.

THE SQUAD

 

I had heard that only 24 teams would get a draft pick under the new system, but looks like they went with the old one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • HVA is a dump and will never be good at football. It's a baseball school. Look at the types of homes being built and families moving in. Not football families. People will move in and look at the school and choose to play for another program. This issue has been snow balling for a decade now
    • Also no shot at an indoor facility it took ya'll almost a decade just to turf blankenship
    • You will not be able to replace Dozier he was a stud and wasted for years. Heyward started strong and then fell of but he will be missed still Rembert could fly and was also underused. Not being replaced. Track has started to close the gap with football. It does not help that the current AD is just stealing money(collecting his check) while the assistant AD is a XC/Track guy who always hated football. Current AD is too worried about not hurting anyone's feelings to do anything at all. Heck he is gotta be 70 plus and looks like a fool wearing kid shoes
    • Will Trez remain 2A after the influx of another 2A school?  
    • As I said somewhere earlier in the thread, the original plans had no outdoor athletic facilities being part of the campus.  The original plan was for HVA to use facilities at nearby schools.  Very late in the process they came up with a plan and found budget to have minimal facilities and crammed them in to space that never was intended for athletic facilities.  
×
  • Create New...