Jump to content

catchers interfernce...


riverdaleman
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE(riverdaleman @ Mar 21 2007 - 11:24 AM) 826419356[/snapback]i read the rule right out of the rule book the batter shall be awarded first base UNLESS all other runners advanced one base on the play 8-1-1e

 

Trust me. You can take the result of the play regardless of whether or not the batter reaches safely. We may be arguing over semantics but it is not cut and dry. The batter can make an out and if the play is more beneficial that way you can choose to let the play stand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(LAfan @ Mar 21 2007 - 02:42 PM) 826419473[/snapback]you are not out for stepping on the plate unless it is while u are striking the ball then it is 2U. Otherwise after you hit the ball you can jump up and down on the plate if you want it is just another base

 

 

Ok thanks. I think what happened is when the batter squared to bunt he had his left foot on the plate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(riverdaleman @ Mar 21 2007 - 11:24 AM) 826419356[/snapback]i read the rule right out of the rule book the batter shall be awarded first base UNLESS all other runners advanced one base on the play 8-1-1e

 

 

Columbiaguy is right. The offense would have their choice, but the umpire is going to award first base unless the offensive team coach says he doesn't want it. If memory serves me correctly, this is the only base award that the team interfered can actually decline the award.

 

To your original scoring question, from my scoring days, the batter is not penalized by the catcher's interference/obstruction. Batter receives no at bat, just as if he had a sacrifice, sacrifice fly or walk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Why would the tax payers be responsible for paying for only a coach? In recent years with all the theft from various programs in schools from different programs with booster clubs (not just sports) the State of TN has made alot of rules surrounding booster clubs and how they handle money.  I have two documents to review, 1 is 40 pages from the state comptroller and the other is 37 pages from my district, so I can consider starting a booster club for my middle school program. It has been too much trouble in the past for the other coaches.  There is no way there needs to be an adult in the school building for 7 hours a day with no responsibilities except coaching. 
    • The only thing that was said at half time of the 45-0 game was Coach Story, he said: "I know y'all have been out there a lot, but kick-off team, y'all need to get down there faster!" Then he and the other coaches proceeded to go into the coaches office and we all went nuts!  It was the only time I can ever remember coaches not saying anything at half time. Definitely a great memory!!!
    • Boyd could actually be a grade below what he is now, but his parents didn't see the need to "redshirt" him like the other city school down the road would have pushed for....
    • too busy with flag football
×
  • Create New...