Jump to content

A/AA Cross Country


flatline17
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 455
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1. Martin Luther King -----85

2. David Lipscomb --------101

3. Dyersburg --------------118

4. Station Camp -----------124

5. USJC --------------------137

6. Macon County ----------188

 

Thats anyone that matters or that has a chance really.

 

I will skew the current rankings based strictly on times run on any course this year and change them to fit the facts what I believe.

 

1. MLK

When they run well, they dominate.

 

2. Lipscomb

Looking to pick up the pieces if MLK struggles.

 

3. Station Camp

Good results and head to head wins over MC.

 

4. Macon County

Great front 2, the rest is picking up.

 

5. Dyersburg

Sleeper team. Ranked #3 on time, but they recently ran a race down Mt. Everest, hence the fast times.

 

6. USJC

Inconsistent, slightly bi polar... it will take these guys running well together. But just cause they're ranked #6 right now doesn't mean they don't have the cards to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Martin Luther King -----85

2. David Lipscomb --------101

3. Dyersburg --------------118

4. Station Camp -----------124

5. USJC --------------------137

6. Macon County ----------188

 

Thats anyone that matters or that has a chance really.

 

I will skew the current rankings based strictly on times run on any course this year and change them to fit the facts what I believe.

 

1. MLK

When they run well, they dominate.

 

2. Lipscomb

Looking to pick up the pieces if MLK struggles.

 

3. Station Camp

Good results and head to head wins over MC.

 

4. Macon County

Great front 2, the rest is picking up.

 

5. Dyersburg

Sleeper team. Ranked #3 on time, but they recently ran a race down Mt. Everest, hence the fast times.

 

6. USJC

Inconsistent, slightly bi polar... it will take these guys running well together. But just cause they're ranked #6 right now doesn't mean they don't have the cards to win.

 

 

how much reaserch did you actually do before posting this conig /roflol.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":roflol:" border="0" alt="roflol.gif" /> If you look at times and or finishs there is no way you can put dl in second macon and station have beat them 3 of 3 times and have a better team average /roflol.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":roflol:" border="0" alt="roflol.gif" /> who knows it could happen just saying if you go by history dl is more like the 6th place team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how much reaserch did you actually do before posting this conig /roflol.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":roflol:" border="0" alt="roflol.gif" /> If you look at times and or finishs there is no way you can put dl in second macon and station have beat them 3 of 3 times and have a better team average /roflol.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":roflol:" border="0" alt="roflol.gif" /> who knows it could happen just saying if you go by history dl is more like the 6th place team

 

 

Not much research needed, just get the stats from TennesseeRunner.com

 

1 TN Martin Luther King High School 85

1) Wasserman, Micah 2010 16:38.53 6

2) Graves, Ryan 2010 16:45.42 8

3) Gilpin, John 2010 17:09.57 13

4) Gilbreath, Jonathan 2009 17:14.12 18

5) Masters, Tyler 2011 17:42.09 40

Average Time: 17:05.95 -- Total Time: 1:25:29.73 -- 1-5 Split: 1:03.56

6) Deharde, Joseph 2011 18:44.48 103

7) Gilmore, David 2011 18:54.25 120

8) Clark, Willie 2011 19:35.78 --

9) Brobeck, Sam 2011 19:35.86 --

10) Cassell, Cj 2010 21:12.98 --

 

2 TN David Lipscomb High School 101

1) Musick, Jeff 2009 16:28.00 4

2) Amonett, Hunter 2009 17:12.00 15

3) Edgeworth, Drew 2010 17:12.00 16

4) Ball, Robert 2009 17:27.00 29

5) Green, Logan 2011 17:41.00 37

Average Time: 17:12 -- Total Time: 1:26:00 -- 1-5 Split: 1:13

6) Rochelle, Marcus 2009 18:22.00 75

7) Casassa, Austin 2012 18:33.00 85

8) Fry, Will 2010 18:43.00 --

9) Barrick, Johnson 2010 18:49.00 --

10) Stubblefield, Clay 2010 19:15.00 --

 

3 TN Dyersburg High School 118

1) Newsom, Loren 2010 16:48.00 9

2) Martinez, Genaro 2009 17:18.00 21

3) Turner, Shannon 2011 17:24.00 26

4) Sanders, Andrew 2010 17:26.00 27

5) Scott, Tallon 2009 17:39.00 35

Average Time: 17:19 -- Total Time: 1:26:35 -- 1-5 Split: 51.00

6) Bowman, Tyler 2010 18:35.00 86

7) Legan, Andrew 2011 19:39.82 175

8) Teague, Ben 2011 21:23.60 --

9) Galewski, Paul 2012 21:49.94 --

10) Murphy, Terrence 2011 24:23.20 --

 

4 TN Station Camp High School 124

1) Charles, Jordan 0 17:07.21 10

2) Gammon, Nick 2009 17:17.55 19

3) McMurtry, Taylor 2010 17:26.08 28

4) Jordan, Charlie 2011 17:33.88 33

5) Upchurch, Christian 2009 17:36.67 34

Average Time: 17:24.28 -- Total Time: 1:27:01.39 -- 1-5 Split: 29.46

6) Johnson, Billy 2011 17:46.75 47

7) Pszenitzki, John 2009 17:57.91 54

8) Kammerzell, Cody 2011 18:23.85 --

9) Leiby, Adam 0 18:32.67 --

10) Dykes, Jordan 2009 18:46.00 --

 

5 TN University School of Johnson City 137

1) Mcvay, Carter 0 17:07.60 11

2) Smith, David 2009 17:14.00 17

3) Loving, Everett 2012 17:20.00 22

4) Augsburger, Trevor 2011 17:43.10 42

5) Collins, Alden 2010 17:45.70 45

Average Time: 17:26.08 -- Total Time: 1:27:10.4 -- 1-5 Split: 38.10

6) McVeigh, Carter 2010 17:49.00 49

7) Lee, Chris 2009 18:20.00 74

8) Wenler, Hayes 0 18:39.00 --

9) Jones, William 2009 18:49.00 --

10) Ochoa, Francisco 2011 19:13.00 --

 

6 TN Macon Co. High School 188

1) Mahaney, Brandon 2009 15:56.57 1

2) Snyder, Steven 2009 16:38.92 7

3) Kepley, Tyler 2010 17:51.00 50

4) Garnett, Kevin 2009 18:11.00 62

5) Darnell, Caleb 2010 18:15.03 68

Average Time: 17:22.5 -- Total Time: 1:26:52.52 -- 1-5 Split: 2:18.46

6) Boxold, Taylor 2011 18:24.23 77

7) Carter, Chase 2009 18:41.44 99

8) Ilia, William 2012 19:21.80 --

9) Givens, Lonnie 2011 19:22.38 --

10) Booth, Braxton 2011 20:04.20 --

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not much research needed, just get the stats from TennesseeRunner.com

 

1 TN Martin Luther King High School 85

1) Wasserman, Micah 2010 16:38.53 6

2) Graves, Ryan 2010 16:45.42 8

3) Gilpin, John 2010 17:09.57 13

4) Gilbreath, Jonathan 2009 17:14.12 18

5) Masters, Tyler 2011 17:42.09 40

Average Time: 17:05.95 -- Total Time: 1:25:29.73 -- 1-5 Split: 1:03.56

6) Deharde, Joseph 2011 18:44.48 103

7) Gilmore, David 2011 18:54.25 120

8) Clark, Willie 2011 19:35.78 --

9) Brobeck, Sam 2011 19:35.86 --

10) Cassell, Cj 2010 21:12.98 --

 

2 TN David Lipscomb High School 101

1) Musick, Jeff 2009 16:28.00 4

2) Amonett, Hunter 2009 17:12.00 15

3) Edgeworth, Drew 2010 17:12.00 16

4) Ball, Robert 2009 17:27.00 29

5) Green, Logan 2011 17:41.00 37

Average Time: 17:12 -- Total Time: 1:26:00 -- 1-5 Split: 1:13

6) Rochelle, Marcus 2009 18:22.00 75

7) Casassa, Austin 2012 18:33.00 85

8) Fry, Will 2010 18:43.00 --

9) Barrick, Johnson 2010 18:49.00 --

10) Stubblefield, Clay 2010 19:15.00 --

 

3 TN Dyersburg High School 118

1) Newsom, Loren 2010 16:48.00 9

2) Martinez, Genaro 2009 17:18.00 21

3) Turner, Shannon 2011 17:24.00 26

4) Sanders, Andrew 2010 17:26.00 27

5) Scott, Tallon 2009 17:39.00 35

Average Time: 17:19 -- Total Time: 1:26:35 -- 1-5 Split: 51.00

6) Bowman, Tyler 2010 18:35.00 86

7) Legan, Andrew 2011 19:39.82 175

8) Teague, Ben 2011 21:23.60 --

9) Galewski, Paul 2012 21:49.94 --

10) Murphy, Terrence 2011 24:23.20 --

 

4 TN Station Camp High School 124

1) Charles, Jordan 0 17:07.21 10

2) Gammon, Nick 2009 17:17.55 19

3) McMurtry, Taylor 2010 17:26.08 28

4) Jordan, Charlie 2011 17:33.88 33

5) Upchurch, Christian 2009 17:36.67 34

Average Time: 17:24.28 -- Total Time: 1:27:01.39 -- 1-5 Split: 29.46

6) Johnson, Billy 2011 17:46.75 47

7) Pszenitzki, John 2009 17:57.91 54

8) Kammerzell, Cody 2011 18:23.85 --

9) Leiby, Adam 0 18:32.67 --

10) Dykes, Jordan 2009 18:46.00 --

 

5 TN University School of Johnson City 137

1) Mcvay, Carter 0 17:07.60 11

2) Smith, David 2009 17:14.00 17

3) Loving, Everett 2012 17:20.00 22

4) Augsburger, Trevor 2011 17:43.10 42

5) Collins, Alden 2010 17:45.70 45

Average Time: 17:26.08 -- Total Time: 1:27:10.4 -- 1-5 Split: 38.10

6) McVeigh, Carter 2010 17:49.00 49

7) Lee, Chris 2009 18:20.00 74

8) Wenler, Hayes 0 18:39.00 --

9) Jones, William 2009 18:49.00 --

10) Ochoa, Francisco 2011 19:13.00 --

 

6 TN Macon Co. High School 188

1) Mahaney, Brandon 2009 15:56.57 1

2) Snyder, Steven 2009 16:38.92 7

3) Kepley, Tyler 2010 17:51.00 50

4) Garnett, Kevin 2009 18:11.00 62

5) Darnell, Caleb 2010 18:15.03 68

Average Time: 17:22.5 -- Total Time: 1:26:52.52 -- 1-5 Split: 2:18.46

6) Boxold, Taylor 2011 18:24.23 77

7) Carter, Chase 2009 18:41.44 99

8) Ilia, William 2012 19:21.80 --

9) Givens, Lonnie 2011 19:22.38 --

10) Booth, Braxton 2011 20:04.20 --

 

 

tn runner is not a complete summary of season bests it only includes some meets, you can't make solid predictions just from tn runner seeing as how their meet coverage is incomplete plus you can have a team run a faster team average and still loose to a team with a lower average because it relies more on place than average time plus i have yet to see dl run these times period much less all run good times as a team at one meet as said macon county and station have had pretty solid wins over dl 3 of 3 times they have raced them, though their times do look really good im not sure where they all come from and in order to be second in my book they need to run with more consistancy as a team, dyersburg does look really good, but if what conig says is true it could be due to the coarse, still they look strong, mlk is def. at the front of the pack right now no debating that, and never count macon out with their two hammers and their third man running strong as well,usjc is running decent times but so far showeing no consistency but you cant count out the defending state champs, and station has run with moderate consistency, and seems to be strong as a pack team.Though they have not had all seven of their top runners run good times at the same race yet. Need less to say it will be a close and very exciting race. Good luck everyone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tn runner is not a complete summary of season bests it only includes some meets, you can't make solid predictions just from tn runner seeing as how their meet coverage is incomplete plus you can have a team run a faster team average and still loose to a team with a lower average because it relies more on place than average time plus i have yet to see dl run these times period much less all run good times as a team at one meet as said macon county and station have had pretty solid wins over dl 3 of 3 times they have raced them, though their times do look really good im not sure where they all come from and in order to be second in my book they need to run with more consistancy as a team, dyersburg does look really good, but if what conig says is true it could be due to the coarse, still they look strong, mlk is def. at the front of the pack right now no debating that, and never count macon out with their two hammers and their third man running strong as well,usjc is running decent times but so far showeing no consistency but you cant count out the defending state champs, and station has run with moderate consistency, and seems to be strong as a pack team.Though they have not had all seven of their top runners run good times at the same race yet. Need less to say it will be a close and very exciting race. Good luck everyone

 

 

Psz- I'm not trying to neg you but come on, use some punctuation and check your spelling once in a while. It's not that hard. /thumb[1].gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":thumb:" border="0" alt="thumb[1].gif" />

 

You are correct saying TN Runner does not have complete coverage, but it is about the easiest place to get MUCH information quickly. It's pretty hard to follow region results outside of one's own area so you may have some better insight to your onw region. Head-to-head competition is certainly a great indicator to point out. I guess they'll just have to go ahead and run the state meet to see who really has it. /smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" />

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MLK and DL and Dyersburg are the top three teams this year for sure. but when we talk individuals Konnor Kessler will no doubt place top five but im betting he wont be too far behind mark cole so keep a look out for him to finish top 5 or better

 

 

 

What???!!! Have I been living in a cave the last few months? MLK will no doubt be top 2 or 3 but David Lipscolm and Dyersburg wont have the snuff, I think, to bring home the hardware. What about the teams that never fail to impress? What about MC and SC, can you really count them out? And do you realize that the defending champs are being counted out of the mix? You underestimate my friend. C'est bon! /dry.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid="

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MLK and DL and Dyersburg are the top three teams this year for sure. but when we talk individuals Konnor Kessler will no doubt place top five but im betting he wont be too far behind mark cole so keep a look out for him to finish top 5 or better

 

 

um no, Konnor Kessler won't be top 5 unless he runs under 16:40. MLK is the best team, but don't count out USJC, they won last year and they still have a lot of talent, i don't know why they don't run at steeple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Choke on this.

 

1. MC 1

2. DL 1

3. MC 2

4. MLK 1

5. MLK 2

6. MLK 3

7. Dyer 1

8. SC 1

9. MLK 4

10. SC 2

11. DL 2

12. DL 3

13. Dyer 2

14. SC 3

15. MC 3

16. Dyer 3

17. SC 4

18. DL 4

19. SC 5

20. Dyer 4

21. MC 4

22. MC 5

23. DL 5

24. MLK 5

25. Dyer 5

 

Martin Luther King 48

Macon County 62

David Lipscomb 66

Station Camp 68

Dyersburg 81

 

The scores will be much much larger than this. This is only the top 5 from each team so things are bound to change. Also, MLK 5, DL 5, and MC 5 all have run 18:33.xx on this course. I didn't actually bother to check the decimals so I just threw MLK last cause they didn't need it and flipped a coin between MC and DL. With MLK's (and everyone else's) weak 5th man, I'd be surprised if the winner scores under 100 points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


×
  • Create New...