Jump to content

Springfield vs White House


DutchMantel
 Share

Recommended Posts

White House must limit the big play potential of the Jackets!! SHS has some skilled players with potential to make plays in the open field. Like I said yesterday, both teams struggle up front, at least compared to last year,  so it may very well come down to who wins that battle as to who wins the game. WH has to be able to run the ball with Sharber to have a chance; they can't become one-dimensional. Springfield will be looking for payback after last year's upset loss. I am personally looking forward to seeing a game from the new stadium at SHS, it'll be my first time!! Go Blue Devils. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Poundtherock23 said:

Now that we’ve all got to know each others stance on here, what’s some keys to the game from both sides? Strengths and weaknesses, areas of improvement? 

i think depth is springfields biggest weakness up front. I do believe we have had issues early with broken coverage but that seemed much better last game. Not sure on white house, have not seen them this year and they have not played anyone with a pulse yet so only time will tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

White House's biggest advantage, in my opinion, is their passing game. Their QB, Nixon I believe, can throw it very well and has decent receivers. Springfield will need to limit their big plays in the passing game. I believe if the Jackets can do this and get some pressure on the QB I think they will be in good shape defensively. 

Springfield's biggest advantage is their team speed and overall athletic ability. I look for White House to take Johnson away if they can, so others will need to step up. They have done it in other games, so I think they will here too. I feel that if Springfield can run the football effectively and not turn it over, they should be ok. 

I feel the only way White House wins is if they can dominate the line of scrimmage on each side of the ball. The Devils are bigger up front that Springfield, but the Jackets have seen that pretty much all year so it's nothing new. Looking forward to an injury free game so neither side can fall back on that after the game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I too think Springfield’s biggest weakness is in the trenches, with depth being the issue. The last couple of games some of the younger players got in the rotation, so hopefully that will rectify itself. The coverage issues seem to be better in the past game, but Springfield will have to be on there toes against White Houses WR and looks like there qb can sling it. I think Springfield will be ok stopping the run and I hope the offense keeps clicking like they have been. All in all should be a great game come Friday night

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Poundtherock23 said:

I too think Springfield’s biggest weakness is in the trenches, with depth being the issue. The last couple of games some of the younger players got in the rotation, so hopefully that will rectify itself. The coverage issues seem to be better in the past game, but Springfield will have to be on there toes against White Houses WR and looks like there qb can sling it. I think Springfield will be ok stopping the run and I hope the offense keeps clicking like they have been. All in all should be a great game come Friday night

True. I believe SHS has been tested a lot more than WH. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Poundtherock23 said:

Now that we’ve all got to know each others stance on here, what’s some keys to the game from both sides? Strengths and weaknesses, areas of improvement? 

This one would be fun to watch.  Good luck to both sides.   
Always play it like it's last one.  (sorry for the video....can't delete it.)  

9 hours ago, Poundtherock23 said:

 

Edited by GreenbrierCat2
erroroneously added.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • From my understanding, Jay Graham pretty much took over HC responsibilities in that game, so you can thank him. Cute Andy didn’t need help, though. Cute Andy could’ve beaten us without any assistant coaches.
    • Tax payer dollars are paid for certified teachers to "teach" and then coach. The primary job is to teach.  There are some district that ay awesome supplements and others that don't. Dyersburg and Dyer County are pretty close if I remember correctly. I would imagine that Football and basketball are above $10,000 now.  I've heard that Milan is $20,000 for boys basketball. I would imagine that football is more than that in Milan.  Collierville has camps that coaches get paid extra for. 3 camps a year, 100 kids a camp, $30,000 right there.  There are places like Memphis-Shelby County schools where the supplements are garbage even for the head coaches. I made less than $3,000 as the head assistant at Germantown in 2015 when we were 26-4 and one of the best teams in the Southeast. As a head middle school coach next year I will make between $4-5,000 at a municipal in Shelby County.  Coaches should be compensated for the jobs that are required but lets keep in mind that they are educators first.  It's pretty frustrating to other teachers that work their tale off teaching 6-7 classes a day to watch someone roam campus, not teach (or have very minimal responsibilities), and get paid the same (more with supplements) as a person who has the some years of experience or sometimes less. 
    • This will get coaches leaving the profession very quickly if this kid wins this case. This is absurd... 
    • yeah money aint right there anymore
×
  • Create New...