Jump to content

Metro Rumors


GoldenTicket10
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Hurricane717 said:

How so? He has went to the state, semis twice and the quarters 3x in his career. If that’s not good enough for Gallatin then suit yourself . I wonder why it would be a fail? Hmmm... I can name name a few metro coaches that can turn that program around but you will say it’s a fail for other reasons 

Not a good fit in my opinion.  His record is not that glamorous to me and I take into account the competition.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DarkKnight4 said:

I guess you fellas are stating Metro coaches cant get the job done? Well lets look at facts, Beech and H'Ville were the only successful program to reach the state from sumner in the last 10 years or so granted some of their best players were Metro kids thanks to the decline of HL. Oakland is the only program Rutherford county in the last 10 years to see a state, not Blackman, Smyrna Siegal , Riverdale. Mt Juliet competes every year but haven't seen a state appearance in a while, BUT IN METRO Pearl, Maplewood, Cane Ride and Hillsboro all have touched a state championship game but you guys continue to look down at metro coaches and they have accomplished more than these other coaches you thinks so highly of. Don't look down on metro coaching they've accomplished more  in some aspects

Just looking at overall record and who they play regularly.  I also don’t think that way about all metro coaches.  But you have to agree that Gallatin has been down and there record against metros is pretty good just saying.  Last two years 8-0 with wins against Hillsboro.  Wins/losses are not the entire issue in Gallatin.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, DarkKnight4 said:

I guess you fellas are stating Metro coaches cant get the job done? Well lets look at facts, Beech and H'Ville were the only successful program to reach the state from sumner in the last 10 years or so granted some of their best players were Metro kids thanks to the decline of HL. Oakland is the only program Rutherford county in the last 10 years to see a state, not Blackman, Smyrna Siegal , Riverdale. Mt Juliet competes every year but haven't seen a state appearance in a while, BUT IN METRO Pearl, Maplewood, Cane Ride and Hillsboro all have touched a state championship game but you guys continue to look down at metro coaches and they have accomplished more than these other coaches you thinks so highly of. Don't look down on metro coaching they've accomplished more  in some aspects

Let's not forget about the metro kids who STAY IN NASHVILLE but end up going to schools in Rutherford & Sumner County.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/1/2018 at 9:37 AM, DarkKnight4 said:

I guess you fellas are stating Metro coaches cant get the job done? Well lets look at facts, Beech and H'Ville were the only successful program to reach the state from sumner in the last 10 years or so granted some of their best players were Metro kids thanks to the decline of HL. Oakland is the only program Rutherford county in the last 10 years to see a state, not Blackman, Smyrna Siegal , Riverdale. Mt Juliet competes every year but haven't seen a state appearance in a while, BUT IN METRO Pearl, Maplewood, Cane Ride and Hillsboro all have touched a state championship game but you guys continue to look down at metro coaches and they have accomplished more than these other coaches you thinks so highly of. Don't look down on metro coaching they've accomplished more  in some aspects

It is more about the Johnny and Joe's than Xs and Os. When those teams face a team of equal or somewhat equal talent that has quality coaching they lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, District12AA said:

It is more about the Johnny and Joe's than Xs and Os. When those teams face a team of equal or somewhat equal talent that has quality coaching they lose.

As does the county schools as well. So what point are you proving. Everyone raves about Blackman and their staff and all these county school coaches but they've only made the semis once I believe so once again Metro coaches accomplish a lot more . Outside of Oakland, Indy, Ravenwood, Beech these so called highly thought of schools are not accomplishing much more than Metro schools

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Way late on this post, but I do believe that I want to at least weight in so to speak lol. I wrestled NAIA competed against some of the best wrestler over all a crossed the divisions and felt great about my college wrestling experience. I think people make the mistake in believe that wrestling some how gets easier as a sport at the smaller college divisions it doesn't the training is mostly the same. I have that on good authority from a coach who was a D1 all-American. it's more the commitment level of the competitors that is different. There is talented wrestlers that can go D1 at any level in the smaller division. sub in Sammy Shires for one he would have done fine on a DI team. He chose a work life ratio that suited him. It's not about talent it's commitment are you going to make training and studying the sport the center of your world cause that's what it takes: NO MATTER HOW TALATENTED BEFORE HAND YOU ARE.  If so then D1 is for you and striving for success at that level is for you like Mr. Palmer said it's what your willing to put in. Now coaches if you have a successful wrestler who fits that bill then by all means D1 is a great option they will see some success no matter how small, but if they are not that committed along with being talented and a killer and you know it then your doing them wrong.  You don't have to tell athletes that you don't think they are D1 tell them to keep their options open to take all their visits to consider all the divisions regardless of their goals. college recruiting visits have you most times wrestle against their current wrestlers coaches and athletes  will find out real quick it's not easy no matter where you go. That way when they make their decision it's a sound one that's based on well rounded experiences.     BobCorker, and oceansize42 I believe what you are thinking is correct but for different reasons. TN wrestler's have the talent... it's a commitment level change. TN wrestlers aren't used to having to put themselves through the level of commitment required and kills them on the D1 level.    WrestlingGod, I agree you should push kids to pursue their dreams, but not at the cost of common sense period... we have to much of that going around this country already. Dreams can turn to poison when these wrestler are not educated on what it truly takes. In TN  a kid who understands wrestling to a high level can be successful with small amounts of hard work. They think their definition of hard work is enough for D1 that is the mistake not the "talent/understanding".  Over-all though we do not celebrate NAIA,D2,D3, or Juco success in this state like other states do. GA/AL celebrates all it's college wrestlers success a crossed the  board no matter the division. Why? because it's hard... I have gone to all the divisions National championships let me tell you to be a all-American at any is impressive especially D2 or NAIA. those guys can scrap and not one of those AA's are an easy match. all of them were state placers or champs multiple times in their high school careers. does that at all sound easy to place at? TN does not give those guys enough credit or shout outs period. it's an over sight because of this D1 or it's less than meaningless   mentality on this site and in this state. GA/AL is better then us on the highest stage because they send guys to D2,NAIA,D3 ect. they come back understanding the sport better then their pervious coaches, and give back and that cycles to athletes readiness to go D1 with clearer understanding of what it takes to be competitive day 1 freshman year.             My post isn't to support one way or the other but to just consider that both sides have merit and that both work when the system in TN. by system I mean coaches are the better educated on preparing athletes for each level they want and should pursue.        
    • If you think McKenzie could've beat Riverside I have a bridge you might like to buy. 
    • Hate to hear Ricky is heading to the old folk's home!
    • By recruiting, I mean members of a coaching staff are talking to, meeting with, giving tours, to students, and their guardians, that are not zoned for their school.    there’s no way that many non Bearden kids just showed up all at once without being recruited. It can’t be a coincidence that all those kids also went through the middle school all star game your boss puts on every year. 
    • Not sure how I would put it as recruiting perhaps kids trying to better their career by going to a head coach and coaching staff with connections all over college football that gets them the opportunity to go play college football and be coached by a coach with a pretty good track record.
×
  • Create New...