Jump to content

West ( 4 - 0 ) at Oak Ridge ( 2 - 2 )


WillieTheWildcats
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, SweetScience said:

We are in a quandary, ain't we? Haha. Like I said in an earlier post, we just don't have a lot of offensive weapons this year, so we have what we have. Man, it was nice to have Pendergrass, Booker, and Graham to bail us out last year, wasn't it? Those fellers could take it to the house at any given moment. Probably the most offensive talent on one team we have had since 05 last year. It's a shame we let Catholic come back in that game last year because I thought with that talent we had a legit chance to win it all. Oh well, what might have been......

Hey no I like that group but wasn’t the most effective offense lol I can’t give them that much credit I love those guys though and they shouldn’t have lost smh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Elitesports4 said:

Hey no I like that group but wasn’t the most effective offense lol I can’t give them that much credit I love those guys though and they shouldn’t have lost smh

I'll tell you why we lost that Catholic game.....LINEMEN...LINEMEN...LINEMEN!  They outweighed OR 50-100 pounds a man up front and that took a toll on the OR linemen in the late third and all of the fourth quarters. You could see it coming. I know you'll say it was all play calling but you must be smarter than that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, catswild said:

I'll tell you why we lost that Catholic game.....LINEMEN...LINEMEN...LINEMEN!  They outweighed OR 50-100 pounds a man up front and that took a toll on the OR linemen in the late third and all of the fourth quarters. You could see it coming. I know you'll say it was all play calling but you must be smarter than that

That’s not why we lost to Catholic it was coaching??? We was up 20 points and you’re saying it was lineman??!! We dominated a majority of game graham and Herbert killed them!!! Are you a joke? You being lineman up for everything to a team that was destroying them! Players didn’t finish and we went away from what was working 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Elitesports4 said:

That’s not why we lost to Catholic it was coaching??? We was up 20 points and you’re saying it was lineman??!! We dominated a majority of game graham and Herbert killed them!!! Are you a joke? You being lineman up for everything to a team that was destroying them! Players didn’t finish and we went away from what was working 

You're the joke. I'll repeat this....they outweighed OR 50-100 pounds a man up front and if you don't think that has a cumulative effect on linemen over the course of four quarters, then you know NOTHING about football...NOTHING. I'm sure you were a so called "skill" player who has never lined up down in the trenches so you speak from a position of ignorance.  You're a typical fan who blames everything on coaches and play calling. There are many plays I wouldn't have called last night but it would NOT have mattered.....they had more speed than OR, more size than OR, and many more athletes than OR!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, SweetScience said:

Their one CB was about 5’6 tops. Why didn’t we exploit that?

#12 had 100+ rec yards and 2tds not including the punt ret td called back.  He smothered your receivers all game and won the 50/50 jump ball for our first score.  I’m not sure that’s the player you want to go after to exploit.  Strong 100yd rushing game from true freshman hb.  Overall balanced pass vs rush game - but have lots of room to improve - overall strong performance against a good OR team.  Hope #10 is OK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MeritIII said:

#12 had 100+ rec yards and 2tds not including the punt ret td called back.  He smothered your receivers all game and won the 50/50 jump ball for our first score.  I’m not sure that’s the player you want to go after to exploit.  Strong 100yd rushing game from true freshman hb.  Overall balanced pass vs rush game - but have lots of room to improve - overall strong performance against a good OR team.  Hope #10 is OK.

 

12 minutes ago, MeritIII said:

#12 had 100+ rec yards and 2tds not including the punt ret td called back.  He smothered your receivers all game and won the 50/50 jump ball for our first score.  I’m not sure that’s the player you want to go after to exploit.  Strong 100yd rushing game from true freshman hb.  Overall balanced pass vs rush game - but have lots of room to improve - overall strong performance against a good OR team.  Hope #10 is OK.

You're right #12,OR didn't have a single receiver who could shake him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, catswild said:

You're the joke. I'll repeat this....they outweighed OR 50-100 pounds a man up front and if you don't think that has a cumulative effect on linemen over the course of four quarters, then you know NOTHING about football...NOTHING. I'm sure you were a so called "skill" player who has never lined up down in the trenches so you speak from a position of ignorance.  You're a typical fan who blames everything on coaches and play calling. There are many plays I wouldn't have called last night but it would NOT have mattered.....they had more speed than OR, more size than OR, and many more athletes than OR!

You’re the one a joke you don’t know anything about football! If the case was lineman why did oak ridge even up to begin with against catholic?? When I played our lineman was bigger than everyone we didn’t win every game and had a ton of athletes and speed?’ Just don’t comment to me and I won’t to you.. you don’t know #### from apple butter and I’m tired of your line man lineman when there was 0 tackles for loss or sacks!!! Weirdo!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bonkers said:

 

You're right #12,OR didn't have a single receiver who could shake him.

 

15 minutes ago, MeritIII said:

#12 had 100+ rec yards and 2tds not including the punt ret td called back.  He smothered your receivers all game and won the 50/50 jump ball for our first score.  I’m not sure that’s the player you want to go after to exploit.  Strong 100yd rushing game from true freshman hb.  Overall balanced pass vs rush game - but have lots of room to improve - overall strong performance against a good OR team.  Hope #10 is OK.

What does receptions have to do with exploiting his height as a defender? He caught a slant and scored because of speed. He did snag one on Isaiah Johnson who should have had an interception! His stats are insane on offense but he is a defense liability if you exploit him right I promise! Small can bully him! He doesn’t make every open tackle 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Elitesports4 said:

 

What does receptions have to do with exploiting his height as a defender? He caught a slant and scored because of speed. He did snag one on Isaiah Johnson who should have had an interception! His stats are insane on offense but he is a defense liability if you exploit him right I promise! Small can bully him! He doesn’t make every open tackle 

He is an athlete with a strong vertical - he gave your receivers fits all night - as did much of the secondary.  That snag should have told you something about how throwing 50/50 balls at him is going to work out for you.  You had over 30 passing attempts for a total of less than 80-90 yards - so you averaged less than 3 yards per attempt.  How big of a liability was he on D?  Surely some of those 30 pass attempts should have exploited him.  He was there at corner all game so how many times did ANY of your receivers get open or snag on him?  Again - that’s not much of a game plan.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Elitesports4 said:

You’re the one a joke you don’t know anything about football! If the case was lineman why did oak ridge even up to begin with against catholic?? When I played our lineman was bigger than everyone we didn’t win every game and had a ton of athletes and speed?’ Just don’t comment to me and I won’t to you.. you don’t know #### from apple butter and I’m tired of your line man lineman when there was 0 tackles for loss or sacks!!! Weirdo!!!!

Man you know less football than anyone on this board. If you had ever been a lineman, you would know that lining up against a man 50-100 pounds heavier than you takes a cumulative effect on you (please look up the definition of cumulative because it's obvious that you don't get it). It's different when you're fresh in the beginning of the game and even in the second quarter. I didn't say big linemen meant you would win every game...smh.  You're embarrassing yourself!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • McKenzie had no trouble with Huntingdon.  
    • Has BA landed any cornfed cowboys to block up front?
    • Yea I agree I will say tho I was a big “ v “ fan if an  opening ever did happen I think it would’ve been good to see him have a shot coming from a power house like Oakland. I’m sure he’s learned a lot from Kevin.  I bet he would bring a really good offense scheme IMO But after all this I just dunno anymore.  Whatever happens with the rumors an such if it did come to and opening I think this messes it all up.  The board members dreams are slowly slipping away now. I haven’t lived there for awhile I just hear what I hear, but my question is would there be any good potential candidates?? That’s why I don’t understand why people want b s out so bad who else could do any better ?? IMO there’s nothing attractive about it? As I stated earlier I went to the last game last year and taking a leak in a porta Potty is pretty sad and still nothing being done they say .. 
    • I have a sophomore that can do 177 (preferred) or 192. Sent you an email.
    • speaking of board members how can a man get arrested 12 days ago and still be head coaching a team in TC school system? looks like your right about the tc board members. I bet it would be different if they had a kid on the team 
×
  • Create New...