Jump to content

Landers


IMDog
 Share

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, THE KING said:

I know people in the stands have hit the panic button but I believe we'll be OK.  We lost and it was a little unexpected but I was cautiously optimistic about tonight.  We gotta clean up the penalties and botched snaps.  It'll be a long season if we mess up that bad every week.  As far as defensively,  I thought we played really well.  Both td passes were well covered,  they just made the plays.  We didn't get manhandled,  we just played sloppy undisciplined football.  Coach Jarrett put everyone to sleep, layed out the carrots and we took the bait

Yall will be fine King. Like you said clean up some penalties and the bad snaps in the red zone and its a different ball game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unaka and NG was about what I expected. A lot of people believe NG has improved but it didn’t show up Friday. It was 38-6 before NG scored late in the 4th against unakas subs. Personally I think Unaka was better last year offensively with those receivers and OL they lost. Their overall run D seems better and it will be put to the test this against the Landers. The scrimmage against what some are saying a “sandbagging” HV left a lot of false hope for NG. Unaka and Cloudland should be a better game but I like to think Cloudland is still to much. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RodgerDodger32 said:

Unaka and NG was about what I expected. A lot of people believe NG has improved but it didn’t show up Friday. It was 38-6 before NG scored late in the 4th against unakas subs. Personally I think Unaka was better last year offensively with those receivers and OL they lost. Their overall run D seems better and it will be put to the test this against the Landers. The scrimmage against what some are saying a “sandbagging” HV left a lot of false hope for NG. Unaka and Cloudland should be a better game but I like to think Cloudland is still to much. 

I don't know Roger.  There needs to be a sense of urgency with the landers.  Our physical ability isn't the issue.  It's the choking in the red zone on 3 occasions that concern me.  It's all the penalties and undisciplined football.  I wouldn't be surprised if the creekers pulled off an upset.  It was 2006 the last time they won at our place and the only time in 40 years. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, THE KING said:

I don't know Roger.  There needs to be a sense of urgency with the landers.  Our physical ability isn't the issue.  It's the choking in the red zone on 3 occasions that concern me.  It's all the penalties and undisciplined football.  I wouldn't be surprised if the creekers pulled off an upset.  It was 2006 the last time they won at our place and the only time in 40 years. 

Dont let that happen.We got took by Oakdale last year and it tastes awful!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, THE KING said:

Well they need to come out of the gate on fire.  Not the way they did in the first half against hv.  It might be a good thing we lost.  It might be a reality check. 

I’d of preferred if you won personally. Will be tough to go on the Roan and win next week. I expect Zac will have a fire lit under them. We will need to be mistake free. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, creekerballer said:

I’d of preferred if you won personally. Will be tough to go on the Roan and win next week. I expect Zac will have a fire lit under them. We will need to be mistake free. 

When you love your school, you support them when they play for state titles and when they go 0-10.  Me and warrior talked about having to go to the car and have an alcoholic beverage.  There are some seasons that will drive you to it :roflolk:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Way late on this post, but I do believe that I want to at least weight in so to speak lol. I wrestled NAIA competed against some of the best wrestler over all a crossed the divisions and felt great about my college wrestling experience. I think people make the mistake in believe that wrestling some how gets easier as a sport at the smaller college divisions it doesn't the training is mostly the same. I have that on good authority from a coach who was a D1 all-American. it's more the commitment level of the competitors that is different. There is talented wrestlers that can go D1 at any level in the smaller division. sub in Sammy Shires for one he would have done fine on a DI team. He chose a work life ratio that suited him. It's not about talent it's commitment are you going to make training and studying the sport the center of your world cause that's what it takes: NO MATTER HOW TALATENTED BEFORE HAND YOU ARE.  If so then D1 is for you and striving for success at that level is for you like Mr. Palmer said it's what your willing to put in. Now coaches if you have a successful wrestler who fits that bill then by all means D1 is a great option they will see some success no matter how small, but if they are not that committed along with being talented and a killer and you know it then your doing them wrong.  You don't have to tell athletes that you don't think they are D1 tell them to keep their options open to take all their visits to consider all the divisions regardless of their goals. college recruiting visits have you most times wrestle against their current wrestlers coaches and athletes  will find out real quick it's not easy no matter where you go. That way when they make their decision it's a sound one that's based on well rounded experiences.     BobCorker, and oceansize42 I believe what you are thinking is correct but for different reasons. TN wrestler's have the talent... it's a commitment level change. TN wrestlers aren't used to having to put themselves through the level of commitment required and kills them on the D1 level.    WrestlingGod, I agree you should push kids to pursue their dreams, but not at the cost of common sense period... we have to much of that going around this country already. Dreams can turn to poison when these wrestler are not educated on what it truly takes. In TN  a kid who understands wrestling to a high level can be successful with small amounts of hard work. They think their definition of hard work is enough for D1 that is the mistake not the "talent/understanding".  Over-all though we do not celebrate NAIA,D2,D3, or Juco success in this state like other states do. GA/AL celebrates all it's college wrestlers success a crossed the  board no matter the division. Why? because it's hard... I have gone to all the divisions National championships let me tell you to be a all-American at any is impressive especially D2 or NAIA. those guys can scrap and not one of those AA's are an easy match. all of them were state placers or champs multiple times in their high school careers. does that at all sound easy to place at? TN does not give those guys enough credit or shout outs period. it's an over sight because of this D1 or it's less than meaningless   mentality on this site and in this state. GA/AL is better then us on the highest stage because they send guys to D2,NAIA,D3 ect. they come back understanding the sport better then their pervious coaches, and give back and that cycles to athletes readiness to go D1 with clearer understanding of what it takes to be competitive day 1 freshman year.             My post isn't to support one way or the other but to just consider that both sides have merit and that both work when the system in TN. by system I mean coaches are the better educated on preparing athletes for each level they want and should pursue.        
    • If you think McKenzie could've beat Riverside I have a bridge you might like to buy. 
    • Hate to hear Ricky is heading to the old folk's home!
    • By recruiting, I mean members of a coaching staff are talking to, meeting with, giving tours, to students, and their guardians, that are not zoned for their school.    there’s no way that many non Bearden kids just showed up all at once without being recruited. It can’t be a coincidence that all those kids also went through the middle school all star game your boss puts on every year. 
    • Not sure how I would put it as recruiting perhaps kids trying to better their career by going to a head coach and coaching staff with connections all over college football that gets them the opportunity to go play college football and be coached by a coach with a pretty good track record.
×
  • Create New...