Jump to content

Turf or Grass ?


BelieveITorNot

Recommended Posts

I'm seeing more and more turf fields popping up throughout the state. It looks really good but isn't really the safest for players (KNEES & TOES). It seems that making hard cuts on turf does damage to the knees and toes. I also see the NFL is working toward moving to all grass. I love the turf look but I love the smell and softness of grass plus player health even more. What's your view on it? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A turf football field offers several key advantages over a traditional grass field, especially for small high school programs with limited budgets. Here's why making the investment in turf can save money and enhance the athletic experience:

  1. Reduced Maintenance Costs

    • Grass fields require regular mowing, fertilization, and aeration, which demand expensive equipment, labor, and materials. Turf fields eliminate these recurring costs, freeing up funds for other areas of the program.
    • Turf doesn’t need watering, which reduces water bills—a significant expense in maintaining a grass field.
  2. Durability and Year-Round Use

    • Turf fields can withstand heavy use without turning into a muddy mess. They are perfect for schools where multiple teams (football, soccer, band, etc.) share the field, or where weather conditions frequently damage grass fields.
    • Grass fields often need time to "rest" to recover from wear and tear, while turf fields are ready for use immediately after games or practices, maximizing their utility.
  3. Weather Resistance

    • Grass fields can become unplayable in rain, leading to game cancellations or costly repairs. Turf fields are designed to drain efficiently, keeping them playable in most weather conditions.
  4. Long-Term Savings

    • While the initial cost of installing a turf field is higher, the lack of ongoing maintenance, repairs, and replacement sod makes it more cost-effective over time.
    • Grass fields often require re-seeding and field repairs after heavy use, which can add up quickly. Turf fields typically last 8–12 years before replacement is necessary.
  5. Consistency and Safety

    • Turf provides a consistent playing surface, reducing the risks of injuries caused by uneven patches, holes, or bare spots on grass fields. This can keep athletes healthier and on the field more often.
    • Schools don’t have to worry about patches of grass dying off during extreme heat or cold, ensuring the field looks and performs its best year-round.
  6. Community and Revenue Opportunities

    • A turf field can host a variety of events, from regional tournaments to community gatherings, without worrying about field damage. This can generate revenue for the school and enhance its role in the community.
    • Turf fields are visually appealing and give the school a professional, modern look, which can boost morale and pride for students and the community.
  7. Environmental Impact

    • Turf reduces the need for pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers, which can be harmful to the environment and require careful handling and costs.
    • The reduced water usage also supports conservation efforts, especially in areas prone to drought.

For small high schools, transitioning to turf isn’t just about aesthetics; it’s a practical choice that aligns with financial constraints, improves safety, and enhances the overall experience for athletes, coaches, and the community. Investing in turf is an investment in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/16/2024 at 7:51 AM, CYJACKETT said:

A turf football field offers several key advantages over a traditional grass field, especially for small high school programs with limited budgets. Here's why making the investment in turf can save money and enhance the athletic experience:

  1. Reduced Maintenance Costs

    • Grass fields require regular mowing, fertilization, and aeration, which demand expensive equipment, labor, and materials. Turf fields eliminate these recurring costs, freeing up funds for other areas of the program.
    • Turf doesn’t need watering, which reduces water bills—a significant expense in maintaining a grass field.
  2. Durability and Year-Round Use

    • Turf fields can withstand heavy use without turning into a muddy mess. They are perfect for schools where multiple teams (football, soccer, band, etc.) share the field, or where weather conditions frequently damage grass fields.
    • Grass fields often need time to "rest" to recover from wear and tear, while turf fields are ready for use immediately after games or practices, maximizing their utility.
  3. Weather Resistance

    • Grass fields can become unplayable in rain, leading to game cancellations or costly repairs. Turf fields are designed to drain efficiently, keeping them playable in most weather conditions.
  4. Long-Term Savings

    • While the initial cost of installing a turf field is higher, the lack of ongoing maintenance, repairs, and replacement sod makes it more cost-effective over time.
    • Grass fields often require re-seeding and field repairs after heavy use, which can add up quickly. Turf fields typically last 8–12 years before replacement is necessary.
  5. Consistency and Safety

    • Turf provides a consistent playing surface, reducing the risks of injuries caused by uneven patches, holes, or bare spots on grass fields. This can keep athletes healthier and on the field more often.
    • Schools don’t have to worry about patches of grass dying off during extreme heat or cold, ensuring the field looks and performs its best year-round.
  6. Community and Revenue Opportunities

    • A turf field can host a variety of events, from regional tournaments to community gatherings, without worrying about field damage. This can generate revenue for the school and enhance its role in the community.
    • Turf fields are visually appealing and give the school a professional, modern look, which can boost morale and pride for students and the community.
  7. Environmental Impact

    • Turf reduces the need for pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers, which can be harmful to the environment and require careful handling and costs.
    • The reduced water usage also supports conservation efforts, especially in areas prone to drought.

For small high schools, transitioning to turf isn’t just about aesthetics; it’s a practical choice that aligns with financial constraints, improves safety, and enhances the overall experience for athletes, coaches, and the community. Investing in turf is an investment in the future.

Good find!! But Grass is safer, my only push back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, BelieveITorNot said:

Good find!! But Grass is safer, my only push back.

If the Football team is the one that uses it, maybe. For alot of these schools there are as many as 3-4 different sports using it. Combine that with the amount of precipitation we get every year, turf is cheaper and more consistent over time 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few things. Turf is now cheaper than grass to maintain, IF you have a good grass field. There are plenty of teams with crappy grass fields, that mow it, and throw some sand in the low spots and pot holes, and survive. There's less injuries on grass as long as the field is maintained. A giant pot hole in the field is definitely not safer. That being said, if a school can raise the money, it's the best most cost efficient way to have a good playing surface all year long, but if a team is willing to do the work, and spend the money, grass is way better, but that also probably means that you also need to have a practice field, which you need to maintain to some degree as well. So realistically turf makes more sense. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements

  • Recent Posts

    • Yes I agree. They lost Alexander from last year but gained Gray and gained a year of experience for the other players as well. They are senior dominate this season as they start 5 seniors, so it should be a fun ride
    • Oh I know about Gibson Co and have seen them play Westview MANY times over the past 20+ years. However, after they lost Hart and Turner last year, I said they would struggle this year with not having a dominant player that could take over a game like years past and had posters on here comment saying they would be good. What I saw tonight is what I expected. They didn’t have a leader that stepped up and handled the ball and took over and ran their offense.    With the dominant win over Dyersburg last week and then Gibson Co this week, I think Westview has proved they are the top team in this area no doubt
    • I would say Westview is very fortunate to get the Gray kid from South Fulton.. I think they’re a different team without her there. She’s a good player. 
    • I’ve watched a lot of west tn girls ball.. and I’ll say this.. Westview dominated tonight. But, the overall season for Gibson has been good. They lost a miss basketball, mvp, highest point scorer in the history of the program in Micah hart, and a really good defender in Miyah Turner.. those aren’t excuses. But maybe Gibson County hasn’t found their new identity without them. I’ll say overall history would say to not let one game base your decision. That program has a rich tradition. Maybe they regroup and find some solutions for the defense and lack of offense at times… still think you can count them in as the other team to get to state from this region and sub state, unless there’s a team I don’t know about. 
    • Westview is best team in 2A ball.
×
  • Create New...