1A and 2A Region 7 Predictions

[Racerman]

2 hours ago, ItsAlwaysSunnyInAtwood said:

Lmao if gleason finishes as a top 3 team in this region I'll eat my dog.

What a hater. Moron 

[ItsAlwaysSunnyInAtwood]

1 hour ago, west10EZ said:

This guy thinks Union City and Peabody are still in 1A I guess  🤣.. They’ll demolish West Carroll .. you’re hating big time .. they’ve got a stud RB/WR in Byington and a heavy SR class.. if they don’t at least come 3rd , injuries are the issue lol

Injuries will always be an issue when you have 24 kids on your roster. Just a fact. If you're betting on Gleason to finish third then you're basically betting on Gleason to finish the season injury free. And that's dumb. 

[ItsAlwaysSunnyInAtwood]

15 minutes ago, Racerman said:

What a hater. Moron 

Being realistic isn't being a hater. Humboldt beats Gleason.....again. 

[west10EZ]

48 minutes ago, ItsAlwaysSunnyInAtwood said:

Injuries will always be an issue when you have 24 kids on your roster. Just a fact. If you're betting on Gleason to finish third then you're basically betting on Gleason to finish the season injury free. And that's dumb. 

If thats your reasoning I can respect it , and honestly 24 kids might be friendly lol… however LC numbers have also been low as of late and just graduated a large SR class .. but i’m big on Humboldt as well . Gleason had a great deal of injuries last year as well , I can’t remember where they stood vs vikings last year but I still like Gleasons chances if heaalthy. . Big IF , but they are more talented than you think . I’m eying a potential transfer there as well . Nico effect is a real concern right now and i’m surprised more people aren’t talking about it . 

[Gfieldjackets05]

I definitely agree that gleason can finish 3rd, if they can stay healthy and I'm from greenfield. Lol

[west10EZ]

10 minutes ago, Gfieldjackets05 said:

I definitely agree that gleason can finish 3rd, if they can stay healthy and I'm from greenfield. Lol

I mean it’s not like all the other teams in this region has a huge amount of depth either .. lol . UC and Peabody are gone .. everyone else has 25-40 players too . 

Edited April 25 by west10EZ

[Gfieldjackets05]

18 minutes ago, west10EZ said:

I mean it’s not like all the other teams in this region has a huge amount of depth either .. lol . UC and Peabody are gone .. everyone else has 25-40 players too . 

I think Greenfield will dress 25-28 players this year. We only had 2 seniors on the team this past year.

[ItsAlwaysSunnyInAtwood]

13 hours ago, west10EZ said:

If thats your reasoning I can respect it , and honestly 24 kids might be friendly lol… however LC numbers have also been low as of late and just graduated a large SR class .. but i’m big on Humboldt as well . Gleason had a great deal of injuries last year as well , I can’t remember where they stood vs vikings last year but I still like Gleasons chances if heaalthy. . Big IF , but they are more talented than you think . I’m eying a potential transfer there as well . Nico effect is a real concern right now and i’m surprised more people aren’t talking about it . 

No I recognize pretty well how good their starters are but they were good last year too. Didn't stop them from finishing the season 0-7 though. Depth and health matter. 

[ItsAlwaysSunnyInAtwood]

11 hours ago, Gfieldjackets05 said:

I think Greenfield will dress 25-28 players this year. We only had 2 seniors on the team this past year.

Didn't Greenfield beat them by 4 or 5 scores last year? So what's the reasoning for Gleason to be ahead of ya'll if you only lost 2 seniors?

Edited April 25 by ItsAlwaysSunnyInAtwood

[west10EZ]

14 minutes ago, ItsAlwaysSunnyInAtwood said:

Didn't Greenfield beat them by 4 or 5 scores last year? So what's the reasoning for Gleason to be ahead of ya'll if you only lost 2 seniors?

talent.. reasoning sickness and injuries.. string of bad luck ., could literally go for everyone else in a region ..the great equalizer . Pretty sure the QB, RB, and a couple others was out .. two best players . If you’re going to hold that against them … hold it against everyone else too lol 

[HarrisFootball]

As we know its April, so all of this is just projection based on everyone being healthy at the same times, and what we think they will do. Gleason could very well fall flat on their face, but if healthy I think they are the third best team based off their talent and coaching. 

 

As for Gleason losing to Humboldt, I could very well see it happening as well. I think talent wise Humboldt can compete with anyone in this region, my hesitations on them are as I said their OL play which looked very questionable at times last year, and their defense which couldn't stop the run at all. If they can learn to tackle this year, they could very well shock some teams and people across West Tennessee

[ItsAlwaysSunnyInAtwood]

13 minutes ago, west10EZ said:

talent.. reasoning sickness and injuries.. string of bad luck ., could literally go for everyone else in a region ..the great equalizer . Pretty sure the QB, RB, and a couple others was out .. two best players . If you’re going to hold that against them … hold it against everyone else too lol 

Ok point me in the direction of the team in this region who lost that many players to injury and I will.