FBMan Posted December 10, 2003 Report Share Posted December 10, 2003 I attended the portion of the TSSAA Legislative Council session where the vote on the Collinwood split proposal was taken, and I think I can give an objective view of what happened. No one other than Mr. Carter and the members of the Legislative Council were permitted to speak. This was not an open forum and this should not have surprised anyone. Mr. Carter acknowledged that the proposal had been under review for a year and had been the subject of a great deal of debate. He stated that the only proposal under consideration was the split--the multiplier concept was simply an idea that the Board of Control could consider when developing a new classification formula. (I believe that the Collinwood proposal required a Legislative Council vote because it invovled a change to the TSSAA by-laws.) One of the members of the Legislative Council asked him to review the implications of approving the proposal. On the positive side, he indicated that it would significantly strengthen Division II by expanding the number of teams and helping the Division II teams on travel. He really did not address the competition issues in any current classification. (I do not believe that it his job, as a paid staff member, to elevate the interests of one or more schools over others, although I know that people may see this issue differently.) On the negative side, he said that travel time and costs would increase significantly, particularly in West Tennessee. He provided some information to the Legislative Council concerning a hypothetical regional breakdown that assumed a split. This was not displayed to the audience. He also said that the TSSAA operating expenses would increase because of the greater duplication and that the member schools should expect the TSSAA to increase its share of revenue from play-offs and tournaments. He said he did not think the TSSAA could take any more from football, but that its share of other TSSAA events (e.g., basketball tournaments) would increase. There also seemed to be an assumption that the greater geographic dispersion of the schools in the event of a split would hurt attendance at some of these events, although I do not believe this was stated. With respect to the vote taken by the TSSAA, he said that virtually all of the Division II schools had voted in favor of a change, which obviously significantly affected the 62% of the member schools that voted for a change of some kind in the TSSAA's poll. The Division II schools then were more divided among what type of change they would like to see. He also reported that Kentucky has a similar and, in some ways, more severe public-private issue than Tennessee. There was not much comment from the members of the Legislative Council. At least one of the members alluded to the question about whether this is a public-private issue or an urban-rural one. From that standpoint at least, it appears the lengthy debate on this topic is causing people to try to determine the true nature of the issue. The bottom line: I got the sense that everyone believes a change of some kind is coming, although not everyone will agree on what the change should be. The TSSAA appears to be searching for a common ground that will help preserve geographic proximity of opponents to lessen travel time and costs but will provide some kind of accommodation to the wishes of a large number of its members. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krichunaka Posted December 22, 2003 Report Share Posted December 22, 2003 Good Report, FBMan, I'm glad that they're suddenly concerned with the added travel expenses, while considering the highly unlikely "change." "Especially in West Tennessee;" give me a break. Unaka and Jellico are in the same district. It's only about 200 miles-plus from one to the other. Cosby to Unaka is only a little over 100 miles. For Cloudland it's even farther to both places. So, pick your poison: Play, and lose.... to the "more local" teams, or be lumped into a district that makes little-to-no geographical sense. So, for those who think that this change - or no change at all - will give advantages to the rural publics; well, I'm preaching to the choir. Happy Holidays! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VolunteerGeneral Posted December 22, 2003 Report Share Posted December 22, 2003 Krichunka...consider this. A split would only help a small handful of 1A public schools. In fact it is very few. Most 1A public schools would see no real change at all. However the adverse affects rise all the way up to 5A. Yes there are some bad travel situations now, but taking away schools (private) would only make that situation worse. That doesn`t make much sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antwan Posted December 23, 2003 Report Share Posted December 23, 2003 Krichunka...consider this. A split would only help a small handful of 1A public schools. In fact it is very few. Most 1A public schools would see no real change at all. However the adverse affects rise all the way up to 5A. Yes there are some bad travel situations now, but taking away schools (private) would only make that situation worse. That doesn`t make much sense. All of these public schools would not have to compete with the privates in the playoffs. If you call that a few...then so be it. You could also add about 15 teams to the list if 4 classes were adopted. 69 Tennessee School for the Deaf 159 Oakdale High School 161 Greenfield High School 176 Tennessee Preparatory School 179 Copper Basin High School 181 Sunbright High School 194 Coalfield High School 199 Red Boiling Springs High School 207 Gleason High School 219 Cloudland High School 224 Lake Co. High School 233 Bruceton Central High School 245 Midway High School 248 Jo Byrns School 253 Huntland High School 255 Greenback High School 255 Lookout Valley High School 261 Moore Co. High School 264 Cornersville High School 266 Celina High School 270 McEwen High School 274 South Pittsburg High School 277 Watertown High School 288 South Fulton High School 302 Gordonsville High School 302 Cascade High School 304 West Carroll High School 324 Collinwood High School 332 Perry Co. High School 338 Whitwell High School 339 Middleton High School 343 Unaka High School 346 North Greene High School 347 Forrest High School 348 Jellico High School 349 Wayne Co. High School 349 Mt. Pleasant High School 349 Monterey High School 354 Cosby High School 359 Powell Valley High School 359 Oneida High School 361 Halls High School Football Division I Class 2A Enrollment School 364 Rockwood High School 369 Mitchell High School 384 Tyner Academy 384 Dresden High School 386 Manassas High School 386 Alcoa High School 387 Adamsville High School 390 Trousdale Co. High School 394 Houston Co. High School 396 Huntingdon High School 398 Harriman High School 403 East Robertson High School 415 Wartburg Central High School 423 Westmoreland High School 425 Richland High School 428 Peabody High School 429 Bledsoe Co. High School 429 Hampton High School 430 Westside High School 433 McKenzie High School 438 Jackson Co. High School 442 Union City High School 449 Polk Co. High School 463 B. T. Washington High School 467 Tellico Plains High School 476 Upperman High School 489 Sweetwater High School 501 Decatur Co. Riverside High School 507 Oliver Springs High School 511 Sequatchie Co. High School 527 Meigs Co. High School 534 Humboldt High School 547 Oakhaven High School 555 Lewis Co. High School 556 South Greene High School 562 Loretto High School 568 Marion Co. High School 575 Treadwell High School 578 West Greene High School 582 Stewart Co. High School 584 Happy Valley High School 586 Camden Central High School 587 Harpeth High School 588 Chuckey-Doak High School 592 Fairview High School 592 Pigeon Forge High School 597 Cannon Co. High School 604 Alvin C. York Institute 613 Smith Co. High School 621 George Washington Carver High School 623 Waverly Central High School 624 Westview High School 644 Milan High School 673 Chester Co. High School Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VolunteerGeneral Posted December 23, 2003 Report Share Posted December 23, 2003 Antwan...you`re wrong. It is only a very few. It`s a nice list you presented, but in reality most of those schools are not good. They won`t succeed whether there are private schools or not. Even some of the better public schools currently in 1A won`t fare any better when teams like Huntingdon and Trousdale are dropped down. Antwan....Instead of losing to good private schools, they`ll lose to good public schools. There would be no real effect on most 1A public schools...period! If I`m wrong then please take a shot at explaining. If not then just drop it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antwan Posted December 23, 2003 Report Share Posted December 23, 2003 Antwan...you`re wrong. It is only a very few. It`s a nice list you presented, but in reality most of those schools are not good. They won`t succeed whether there are private schools or not. Even some of the better public schools currently in 1A won`t fare any better when teams like Huntingdon and Trousdale are dropped down. Antwan....Instead of losing to good private schools, they`ll lose to good public schools. There would be no real effect on most 1A public schools...period! If I`m wrong then please take a shot at explaining. If not then just drop it. You still don't get it...don't expect you ever will. The vast majority of those schools don't want to play the privates. I have listed numerous times why. It has nothing to do with winning a title. Is that explanation enough? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VolunteerGeneral Posted December 23, 2003 Report Share Posted December 23, 2003 Antwan...I get it. You don`t. Thevast majority of those teams would not be effected. It doesn`t matter nor do I care if they don`t want to play them, that has nothing to do with it. The fact is the VAST MAJORITY won`t be effected. Again if I`m wrong then give it your best shot to explain...I`ll listen. But not wanting to play them does not cut it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antwan Posted December 23, 2003 Report Share Posted December 23, 2003 (edited) Antwan...I get it. You don`t. Thevast majority of those teams would not be effected. It doesn`t matter nor do I care if they don`t want to play them, that has nothing to do with it. The fact is the VAST MAJORITY won`t be effected. Again if I`m wrong then give it your best shot to explain...I`ll listen. But not wanting to play them does not cut it. Nah...that's just not the answer you want to hear...so you dismiss it. You don't listen if someone says something you don't agree with. We don't want to play the privates because they have an unfair advantage. It has nothing to do with winning a title. By your logic...only a few teams have a chance to win. Why not have just one class. Only a few teams would be affected by that. The VAST MAJORITY of teams aren't going to win anyway...right? Edited December 23, 2003 by Antwan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chakra20 Posted December 23, 2003 Report Share Posted December 23, 2003 (edited) Antwan what he is sayin is that prolly somewhere in neighborhood of 90% of the schools it wouldnt effect them. The only effect would be the names on the front of the jerseys of the school that where kickin their butts. Edited December 23, 2003 by Chakra20 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CYJacket Posted December 23, 2003 Report Share Posted December 23, 2003 Antwan...you`re wrong. It is only a very few. It`s a nice list you presented, but in reality most of those schools are not good. They won`t succeed whether there are private schools or not. If I`m wrong then please take a shot at explaining. If not then just drop it. General, you are wrong in the 1a list alone I found 10-11 teams that are in contention in their region year in and year out. So yes they are very good, just small. The privates do have an advantage and we have discussed this ad infinitem in the past, so I won't go there. Now, antwan, be advised that Powell Valley High School is now Cumberland Gap High School and combined with Forge Ridge High School. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheEgoHasLanded Posted December 23, 2003 Report Share Posted December 23, 2003 Antwan, I would believe your statement "we don't want to play the privates because of their advantages" IF...some of the 1A and 2A schools didn't have the same advantages. Alcoa...Great school district, more football state championships than 95% of the teams out there...and oh yes, OPEN ZONED. Tyner...Magnet, free, great football team, best football player in the state in Demonte Bolden...OPEN ZONED. Someone also said that South Pitt is open zoned? I don't know, I've never been there, but if that is true, then you need to explain yourself. We could also talk about all the Memphis City schools such as Mitchell High School in AA. They went to the state championship last year, have a brand new school, great football coach (former U of M player) and great facilities...their coaches make more money than 95% of private school teachers...in fact the only two private schools who pay their teachers what the city school teachers make are Hutchison and MUS (both D2 schools!!!) Mighty Mighty Mitchell, Carver, and other really good 2A schools would move back down...it would just start all over...you'd be losing to schools that are open zoned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GregC Posted December 23, 2003 Report Share Posted December 23, 2003 161 Greenfield High School 219 Cloudland High School 245 Midway High School 255 Greenback High School 274 South Pittsburg High School 288 South Fulton High School 302 Gordonsville High School 304 West Carroll High School 324 Collinwood High School 338 Whitwell High School 349 Wayne Co. High School 349 Mt. Pleasant High School 361 Halls High School All of these teams were eliminated from the 1A playoffs by a private school. Wayne Co. was the only public 1-A school that defeated a private school in the playoffs. Plus, Perry Co, Middleton, McEwen, and Jo Byrns are in regions in which only private schools advanced to the playoffs(7A & 5A). That's 13 eliminated by privates and 4 more who didn't get in because four privates schools finished ahead of them in their region. I hope I didn't miss anyone. If so, please forgive me and correct me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.