Jump to content

ChattanoogaCannon

CoachT+
  • Posts

    1,088
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ChattanoogaCannon

  1. Cannon,

     

    We can holler "play the whistle" until we lose our voices, however players are naturally going to react to a linesman raising a flag for offsides.  In the emotion of a game, it's a natural reaction.

     

    I saw 4 DIFFERENT incidences of this rule that were NOT called correctly just this weekend alone.  Since it didn't cause a goal or cause a goal to be called back, it wasn't a "big deal" however it raises the fact that this rule will be called completely differently each and every game.

     

    I COMPLETELY agree with the rule in the interpretation of if a defender purposely plays a bad back pass, or a bad square pass, but to have a deflected header or a ball skimming off a mis-kick should be ruled differently.  If a player is offsides at the kick, the player should be called offsides (obviously if they are not involved in the play, they should not).  In our situation, the player was on the back side, the cross was to the back side, and my centerback mis hit it and it continued to the girl (who was offsides when the ball was played).

     

    So now my players need to decide whether or not to risk playing a ball that they might or might not get to?  Because if they don't play it right, then there is a HUGE loss to the consequence of this.

     

    Really easy for people to say "well, that's the rule"... well, just wait until it knocks you out of the play offs and then come let me know how you feel about it.

    G, I'd love to hear about the 4 different incidences. It would help us all learn and educate others. There have been tons of meetings and discussions on the USSF side of things, but probably not many on the TSSAA side of things, though the topic was covered at the coaches' meeting in Chattanooga. To me, it makes things much simpler. You don't have to read the mind of a player as to their intentions. Sure, sometimes it is obvious that a player misplayed the ball, but sometimes it isn't. And eventually, it will lead to much greater consistency on the calls, which is the reason for the change.

     

    I am not for or against this new interpretation, so I guess I am one of those people that say "well, that's the rule"  :mrgreen:. I mean, most any interpretation can knock you out of the playoffs. A DOGSO rule (which is also changing btw), a handling call (how many times has that changed over the years), I could go on. Personally, I am thrilled that IFAB revamped the laws. The laws had grown into one of those houses that keep getting added on until you end with stairs to nowhere. 

  2. The offside rule "interpretation" was put in by FIFA 2 years ago. NFHS, whose rules Tennessee follows, added this interpretation this year. (As an aside, NFHS is always a year or two behind US Soccer, i.e., FIFA. An example is the new law that went into affect July 1 allowing the kick-off to go in any direction. I assume NFHS will adopt this rule next year).

     

    The interpretation is not really new, just clarified. The law has not changed. Obviously offside causes confusion by folks that have never bothered to read the FIFA laws or the NFHS rules, and lots of arguing among those of us that have read them. The new interpretation is meant to clear up the offside confusion that occurs when a defender plays the ball. Everyone should know that if a defender deliberately plays the ball, an attacker in the offside position is free to play the ball with no offside infraction. ( the exception being a ball coming off a save by the keeper) The interpretation emphasizes "deliberate". As trebs says, the referee no longer has to judge if a defender played it well or not. The only question becomes did the defender attempt to play the ball? So, if a defender goes up to head the ball, and the ball goes back toward the goal, offside resets.

     

    IMHO, the best way for a ref crew to handle this is not to raise the flag if a player score who is the offside position. The AR should stand stock still after the goal, so the center ref will have to go over to talk to the AR. Players should always play to the whistle. Nothing new here. How many goals have we all seen when players stop because they think an infraction has occurred? PLAY TO THE WHISTLE should be part of every coach's pregame instruction.

  3. Sorry about the "dumping of the water cooler" after the game.  It was win 200 for me and the girls wanted to celebrate.  I hope that your team didn't take it in poor taste.  

     

     Congrats, G! You need to get the TSSAA record book updated!

  4. Since Middle Valley Magic retired, I will throw out this top 10:

     

    1) CCS - team to beat state-wide in A/AA

    2) Baylor - can't wait until next year when they move to the newly created Division III

    3) GPS - they will get the eyeball test this weekend

    4) Notre Dame - very balanced, final record might be 5-5-5 going into playoffs

    5) East Hamilton - Coach Hill finally has some depth

    6) Walker Valley

    7) Boyd

    8) Cleveland

    9) McMinn Central

    10) Sequatchie County - their average margin of victory in pre-season is 16

  5.  

    CC, whats up with that....thats the 1st in EH school history....though it was only a teaser, EH must feel as if they have won a state championship.....we should discuss this issue over suds

     

    Booger just sayin  :mrgreen:

     

    It's all good, brother. BTW - My liver has finally recovered from your tenure roaming the fence.

  6. Notre Dame 0 East Hamilton 1

     

    This scrimmage was fairly even with both teams playing a lot of players. Both teams had about 30 players dressed, so a 20 minute JV scrimmage followed. ND will have a hard time scoring goals this year, which isn't anything that unusual given Schem's defensive tactical mindset. ND failed to convert two 1-on-1 ones with the keeper, and sailed a header off a corner kick just over the cross bar. I counted 5 shots on goal for ND, and 2 for East Hamilton. The East Hamilton goal came with about 10 seconds left in the game. It should be a fun season, and I will savor every game. I only have 2 left as a parent.

  7. I like the Georgia rule, where I also officiate games. They basically have a 10 goal rule, with some nuances.

     

    First checkpoint is at 20 minute mark of 1st half. If lead is less than 7 at halfway point, the entire half is played regardless of how big the differential gets. If lead is 7, 8, or 9 goals at the halfway point, the half ends and the 2nd half is shortened to 20 minutes. If the lead is 10 or greater at the halfway point, the game ends.

     

    Next checkpoint is half time. if the lead is 10 or greater at the half, the game ends.

     

    In the 2nd half, once a lead becomes 10 goals, the game ends.

  8. cant say that the Lady Fighting Irish have laid down stats that are near that impressive...thinbkin its like 46 to 27......yall appear to be defensively strong and a scoring machine.....stats say Greeneville is destined to win.....looks like ND is the underdog

     

    Booger just sayin :mrgreen:

    Do you think outcome will be any different than past years? Greeneville has won some games in the state tournament, but they seem to hit a wall when playing one of the alphabet, Christian schools. Scheduling is so important when preparing for a state tournament run.

  9. I'm not much on predictions, but it will be a huge upset if Boyd or Grace join ND or CCS at the state tournament. I think both ND and CCS advance to the Boro next week regardless of what happens on Thursday. Both Boyd and Grace do have very good coaches, so maybe they can scheme something up. I taught the current Boyd coach a lesson in how to win a playoff game with an undermanned team a few years ago in a middle school game, so hopefully he forgot.

×
  • Create New...