Wow, I didn't know doing a simple speech for my class in college would bring up such a debate. I don't have children, I am not a coach, I am not a teacher (yet), just simply a high school athlete has been. All I wanted to know was if anyone disagreed or agreed with this rule. You brought to my attention though that this one rule could affect many other situations in our lives. On the high school level I do agree that students must put academics before athletics, because how many of those high school athletes actually play on the collegiate level? On the college level, those athletes I'm sure have tutors and professors willing to help them pass, because they need the athletes on the court or field for their schools reputation. However, sometimes do high school teachers not pass a child simply because they need him in the athletic aspect? Maybe the school is in the state tourny or about to play a huge rival. No Pass, No Play... good rule or not? Thank-you everyone for your comments. I appreciate it greatly and your thoughts will make my speech much more effective. Thank-you again so much for your time and help. Keep the posts coming, I'll keep on checking. Also from now on can you please post what position you have to the argument. Such as are you a teacher, coach, parent, player. or just an outsider looking in. Thanks again for your time.