mustangvol

9 minutes ago, Mcraiderdad said:

Very small. 

Is it the size of Huntingdon's or do we need to bring chairs 

How is cornersville vistor seating 

My understanding is that he gets to play

M 28 14

What about them donkeys now

Agree 100%

Whether its football or life working earning wages i agree fully seniority is a tie breaker if everything is equal. it used to be an honor to just play/letter as a sophmore, i know freshemen got the saturday morning props, only diff in them and jrs and srs' which moved the ball wll, is the fr protected the ball and put td on the board. should fr start next game, no dont be crazy. but a little healthy competition initiated by coaching staff is great. if srs and jrs going to pout like they have the last three weeks and come out flat then i say go to fr sooner this week. no spot whether running back or lineman should be set in stone if not giving a enthusiastic 110%. anyone calling for swensons head doesnt know much about football and coaching and probably has never even coached a tball team. lol

If Hillard,sisk, and McCarty was not sacred to hit somebody and hold on to the ball with two hands we would. Be 6 and 0 instendy they to busy looking back to see who coming

24 is better than McCarty

They don't drop the ball and they move the ball against Camden starting d last night I would a give them a chance to show starters they have to work for it. That its not just a hand out.

If Huntingdon don't start freshmen running backs and qb next week he's crazy

Who won

Maybe it is time for the administration to start looking for a coach that knows more than four plays. We lost the only coach we had when Johnny Mac did not come back this year. The line play and special teams play are both down and he coached both and is a great motivator.

The National Federation of High Schools adopted the rule hoping to impress upon coaches and players the need to have all helmets properly snapped.

One question that came up immediately is if a timeout could be substituted for a player leaving the game.

Another change is more of a further definition of blocking below the waist.

“In the past if someone is not in the free-blocking zone — if a defender’s hands touched you before you touched him — then all bets were off,†McWherter said.

“Now, 95 percent of the time [the call] will be whether the initial surge was an illegal block. Did [the blocker] go low or did he start above the waist and a defender pushed him down low?â€

Local referees director George Shuford indicated that it was not a major change.

“It is an interpretation of calling the play. I don’t think coaches need to be concerned about it and I don’t think [the problem] is the way coaches are teaching,†he said.

There was no mention of defenders chopping blockers below the waist, which at times presented itself last year.

“There was some controversy on that last year where defenders were cutting offensive players, especially the fullback, out of the box and then in the box,†Slaughter said. “I was hoping there would be a rule that would eliminate defenders diving into offensive players’ legs. I don’t think there are that many backs or receivers blocking below the waist. It’s on defense where it’s a bigger issue.â€

In gridiron football, a chop block is an attempt by an offensive player to cut block a defensive player who is already being blocked by another offensive player. The second block may need to be below the thigh or knee, depending on the code. In the NFL, NCAA, and in high school football, the penalty for a violation is 15 yards.[1]

Chop blocks are banned because they are dangerous. They were first banned in the NCAA in 1980.[2]

Serious question. Have any of y'all heard of hitting below the waist on defense?

Yes chop blocking