Foolsball101
-
Posts
101 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Foolsball101
-
-
8 minutes ago, sportsnutz said:
Ok. At this point we all know that Cornersville kept the scoreless streak going by playing their key players the whole game. Personally, that doesn't make it any less impressive to me. Even all-Pro players have lapses in judgement and focus from time to time and for Cornersville to have avoided that all year and not given up a single big scoring play is a testament to the solid discipline and coaching this team has. That's a recipe for winning in the playoffs and they will be tough out for anyone. In my opinion, they are EASILY the favorites in the west.
I'm not trying to belittle that accomplishment. Very well coached ball team
-
4 hours ago, cornerback10 said:
Okay
This rule would give students at 4,5,6A Schools a penalty free year to go to a new school. As an example an athlete from Blackman high school who started every game could go to Cornersville next season without moving or having a change of residence.
-
3 minutes ago, Jobres76 said:
I would call it respect. These players wanted to keep the scoreless streak intact to finish the regular season and knew by putting in all subs that could possibly be in jeopardy. There was a good mix at the end of the game, but will conceded that some of the starters did remain in the whole time. Huntland definitely has weapons on the field, and I think the Cornersville coaching staff and the players knew that. I like to think of the scoreless streak like the Undertaker's streak at Wrestlemania. Keep it as long as you can, but at some point it will come to an end.
Fair enough and well said. Huntland lost a weapon due to the late hit towards the end of the game on a kickoff/return. Season ending injury to the leading wr, and starting db.
-
2 hours ago, Chad02 said:
And there were several jv in towards the end u mad because u didnt score JS
Negative i had a roster and watched, the two running backs that also played defense never stepped off the field. By the way those two young men are outstanding ball players
-
4. Proposals for Changes in TSSAA/TMSAA Constitution and Bylaws a. Proposed Change to Article II, Section 9 (Age Limit) of the TSSAA Bylaws: This proposal is to amend the bylaws in a manner that would allow for individual consideration of junior varsity eligibility for students to participate in athletics if they have reached the age of 19 on August 1st, so long as the student falls within qualified Individuals with Disabilities Act and has not exhausted eight semesters of high school eligibility. Rationale: This would not remove the age requirement, but would create a waiver option so students with appropriate documentation could be allowed to participate on the junior varsity level up to eight semesters. Submitted by Dobyns-Bennett High School b. Proposed Changes to Article II, Sections 12 and 13 (Eligible and Ineligible Transfer Students) of the TSSAA Bylaws: This proposal is to replace Article II, Section 12 b (currently the bona fide change of residence rule) with: Except as otherwise provided in Section 13 below, the following transfer students are eligible: b. The student transfers to a new school that is outside the twenty (20) mile radius of the previous school, so long as the principal of the former school attests in writing that the move was not for athletic or disciplinary reasons (including bona fide change of residence). This proposal also adds an item to Article II, Section 12. The new Article II, Section 12 k would read: k. Other than reasons listed above within Section 12, a student with an athletic record may transfer with no penalty as long as the transfer is to a receiving school that is in a different classification or division from the departing school. The student must transfer before the departing school’s 1 st day of classes in order to be eligible in the receiving school’s TSSAA sanctioned sports for the upcoming school year. If the transfer occurs during the school year, the student will be ineligible for the current school year in all sports in which he or she has an athletic record. A student may transfer under this rule one (1) time during his/her high school years. Finally, this proposal removes Article II, Section 13 a-c (items currently dealing with students without a bona fide change of residence). The proposed Article II, Section 13 a would read: The following transfer students are ineligible at the varsity level for a period of twelve months from the student’s last participation date: a. A student who transfers to any school within a twenty (20) mile radius of the athlete’s current school. The proposal replaces any other reference to a bona fide change of residence with the concept of moving outside the twenty (20) mile radius of the athlete’s previous school.
Rationale: There is widespread abuse of the current transfer loopholes (particularly involving “bona fide change of residence”). Even if a student has a “bona fide change of residence” that is within the twenty (20) mile radius, a maximum of twenty (20) miles is not an unreasonable burden for transportation. Precedence has already been established (with non-public schools) that a twenty (20) mile distance constitutes “territory.” This would eliminate manipulation of the current system and simplify eligibility. Additionally, a student with an athletic record may have one “penalty free” transfer during high school – due to the variety of reasons that students transfer. Many times, this is accomplished with falsified documentation. It is common practice for a student to transfer multiple times using the current change of residence rule. This new proposal would allow one legal “fresh start” over the course of a high school career. However, this one allowance must be to a school competing in a different classification or division and be done prior to the school year for full eligibility. While some may argue that the current transfer policy is only an isolated problem in a few areas of the state and in certain sports, the policy does have an impact on the entire state once post season play begins. Those schools with multiple transfers are often the same schools competing for state championships year after year. Nebraska has a bylaw that supports each student-athlete a one-time transfer without a domicile change as long as the transfer is to a different division. Arizona considered a rule in 2013 that would have ruled student-athletes ineligible for one year if they transferred to a school within a 50-mile radius of their previous school.
-
Just now, cornerback10 said:
I bet you are a heck of Pop Warner coach.
Middle School, 5A TSSAA Highschool & Div II college.
-
1 minute ago, cornerback10 said:
Mission accomplished
Good luck against McEwen. Doesn't seem like you'll need it. Hope to attend round 2
-
Just now, cornerback10 said:
They got beat by 41 points.
forty-one points
you understand football?
(I know you’re trolling but this is sort of fun)
Yep, In coaching I've lost big to a team first time around. Then take the things i learned in that game and beat the same team in the playoffs by double digits.
-
I don't expect any gamesmanship or anything less than the comments I'm seeing from a team that shows 0 sportsmanship.
-
No, I'm hanging my hat on what i saw in the game, and actually understanding football. I'm not a Hornet, never went to that school, just someone who has former players i coached there. Huntland did a lot of good things, shot theirselves in the foot, never got a break from the refs (who called a terrible game), and where Huntland messed up is they came in nervous i think.
-
1 minute ago, cornerback10 said:
Cornersville didn’t lose to Huntland even in our bad years.
Death, taxes, and beating Huntland are the only things guaranteed in life.
Goodluck with that, i believe you are vastly underestimating the competition
-
Just now, leadfarmer said:
So what you are saying is that in 3 short weeks Huntland will have found their passing game and an answer for Cornersville's offense? Bahahahaha
Shut down Cornersville's passing game, running game up next
-
according to what i heard, your coach said his players came in the next day saying they had never been so sore.
-
1 minute ago, cornerback10 said:
41-0
The past won't help either
-
Just now, leadfarmer said:
Yes it will be different...we will be playing Wayne County.
For cornersville's sake i sure hope so
-
Too bad that trash talk won't help your team next week
-
Daggum what did we do lol
-
Just now, cornerback10 said:
They scored in the second half against the JV. JV buckled down the rest of the year. Left a sour taste in their mouth.
I never saw much of a second team in against Huntland even on the last play of the game had starters in
-
Can someone explain what happened in week one against Community? How does a team that finished 1-9 be the only team that scored on Cornersville all year. 20 points at that?
-
For the cornersville folks in this feed, how did a 1-9 Community team post 20 points on that defense in week 1? I still can't wrap my head around it. Did you guys miss players or something
-
10 hours ago, Jobres76 said:
What number?
14
-
12 hours ago, leadfarmer said:
You sound like a liberal saying " but but but Hillary won the popular vote". Cornersville most definitely want to see Huntland in the second round.
Round 2 will be different than a few weeks ago. Prepare to eat your words
-
Huntland lost a starter against cornersville late, and he's done for the season. Still trying to figure out how to replace his productivity.
-
On 10/29/2018 at 7:20 AM, cornerback10 said:
Wayne County-34
Huntland- 15
Wayne County is the perfect team for Cornersville before Huntingdon. We need a real challenge and Wayne County will give us that.
Huntland screwed the pooch against Cornersville, and if you had watched that game between the 30s you would have thought Huntland won. Cornersville doesn't want to see Huntland rd 2
Huntland @ Wayne County round 1
in Class 1A & Class 2A
Posted
No hard feelings, things were just different in Cornersville, to each his own though.