I think it's that Gibbs is better than they showed against Halls. You should have seen how many passes their receivers dropped. Halls, I think, would have still beaten Gibbs even if Gibbs had been on, but it would have been a lot closer. Gibbs had an off-night against Halls and CAK is down from where they were. Harb meant a lot to them offensively. So that's my reasoning. The equalizer could be, as some have asserted, that CAK is better-coached, which I believe is true. That's not to slam Randy Carroll; it's just that Young is that good, IMO.