Anonymoustiger

Waverly 49 Stewart 21

2 hours ago, FastEddieDavis said:

Elliott also has played a key role defensively, creating 3 forced fumbles, recovering 2, has a tackle for a safety, and several big hits for tackles. He’s more than a running back this year. 

I believe he’d win it no problem at the pace he’s rolling on both sides of the ball

38 minutes ago, vandyfan1 said:

Sycamore is not beating White House. Come on guys

Thank you 

9 minutes ago, ponyup said:

Easton Elliot is the #2 rusher STATEWIDE.  He has to be at the top of the discussion right now...  over 1200 yards and 17TD, not to mention he did not play much of the 2nd half in 3 of those games..

Who’s number 1?

3 hours ago, ponyup said:

No poster, just calling it like I saw it.  Take the 1st quarter away and White House got man handled in everyway possible. The score was made it look a lot closer than it actually was.  If you watched the game you know what I mean.  I didn't comment on this post all week because I was worried White House had a chance to win, and now I can honestly say I was shocked to see just had bad they truly are,  I had been reading it on here all year where people was saying that sycamore was the better team but I just couldn't see it then... but now I do  

White House would man handle sycamore

Just now, Anonymoustiger said:

Easton Elliot from waverly has 1,262 yards and 17 touchdowns on 100 carries averaging 12.62 per carry through 5 games

A few 300+ yd/ 5 touchdown games

Easton Elliot from waverly has 1,262 yards and 17 touchdowns on 100 carries averaging 12.62 per carry through 5 games

13 minutes ago, DbCooper said:

Score?

14-7 White House at the half

Very very impressed with the blue devil run defense. 

Any sparks yet?

57 minutes ago, Mitch53 said:

Vandyfan1, what do you thank the score will be in this game? I agree that camden sucks. They say they are re buiding but it sure is hard evidently.

I’m not Vandy, but I had previously stated 42-21, that’s what I’m hoping to see, I do believe it will be much tougher than that, I would have to go waverly 28 to 24

1 hour ago, Trollin said:

Waverly 42

White House 35

42-21*

9 hours ago, copacanobra said:

Lol the only one who has made an excuse is you.  Crying about your WRs not being able to catch.  

While we’re on the topic of wrs, the same receiver that caught 3  touchdowns against White House last year returns as a junior. That being said, the other 3 receivers will have to step up bc White House coaching staff will make adjustments based off last years game to slow him down as much as they can.

1 minute ago, FastEddieDavis said:

I think it’s going to be a close game. I’m a little worried about our LB’s against the WH offense. 

That killed waverly last year, linebackers would flow with the run and the quarterback just pulled it and shot right through the middle where backers would fill

3 hours ago, Trollin said:

Unless you have another Harper McAffee and Blackburn, I don’t see it happening. Without Blackburn last year y’all were nothing. We will see come Friday. I know Waverly is licking their chops at another shot at White House. Real Talk 

Tbh it really wasn’t even them three players. Waverly just flat out got beat last year. They got beat by White House and they beat themselves. Horrible defense, poor execution, while White House was able to execute. That being said, that’s last year and last year doesn’t matter. Waverly 42 White House 21

Waverly shows flashes of a great team at times. They have a very strong running game. Wide receivers seem to be able to consistently CATCH A BALL, something the receivers could not do against White House a year ago. Both oline and dline are very good, pretty much return all starting linemen from last year. Secondary can be questionable at times. I could see this being a close game if White House can stop the run game. If not then it will be a long night for the blue devils.

14 minutes ago, WDE7227391 said:

Nah. Everyone knew going into the season it was a 2 team race between waverly and sycamore

You don’t see any waverly posters on here bragging and talking themselves up, you see them talking abt how bad and poor of a performance waverly had. I’m confused on how you’re trying to come off with your comments.

1 hour ago, vandyfan1 said:

Waverly has a lot of work to do. 

You beat me to it, 3 games by and it seems to be the same problems that are not getting fixed, it could’ve very well been 70-7, but had it not been for a couple playmakers for the tigers, sycamore could’ve very possibly stole one last night. Very poor performance by the tigers.

2 hours ago, Truthurts said:

CA is basically one dimensional. Waverly had a couple of players missing that could’ve helped on both sides of the ball. That being said CA  did not impress me at all. And Waverly has played one terrible team in Camden and a mediocre team in CA. I’m not sure what the rest of the schedule holds for Waverly but the depth could be a issue down the rd

I think you’re right, I also think it’s still early, still some molding together for waverly to really hit a stride mid season. I think waverly is less athletic this year, but more physical.

Tigers will be without one wr for sure, the other one is still questionable. If both are out I’m taking Waverly still 24-28

Well no thoughts on this game? Score predictions? @Trollin@vandyfan1 @Wavo2004?

20 hours ago, Trollin said:

Waverly will have 2 key starters out Friday. They were also out 2nd 3rd and 4th quarter of camden game also. 

Should still have enoigh weapons to score, that’s 2 starting receivers out

1 hour ago, WDE7227391 said:

Waverly will be the only team to win in region this week

It’d be nice if the majority of the region could pull out wins, ya never know, waverly may lose, haven’t heard or seen much on CA, I’m sure they may be talented

2 hours ago, Trollin said:

Columbia Academy at Waverly

Fairview at Creekwood 

Greenbrier at White House

Harpeth at Cheatham 

East Robertson at White House Heritage

Sycamore at Hunters Lane

Gibson County at Stewart County

 

 

 

 

Waverly, sycamore , cheatham, and Fairview win

2 minutes ago, Trollin said:

Haven’t heard or know much about CA since they went to Division ball. They were always tough when we played them years ago. Should be a good challenging game for the Tigers.

I’m hoping it’s a big test for the tigers. I know that CA wasn’t too great last year, but that doesn’t mean they didn’t have talent, I’ve heard this year they are loaded, maybe someone else can inform the thread a little better