nameofthegame

I have to say last night was a great game between two great teams, its bad one had to lose. im a huntingdon fan that loves football both teams played great. Have to agree officials were not the best. Huntingdon drove the ball good but just couldnt put it in seemed like they would get stuck right on the 20 everytime. The deciding factor in this game was WC passing game, I even called the play at the end, it had been open all night just wasnt able to connect on it one was dropped and the other slightly overthrown. But I dont think anybody can leave from that game and not say both teams left all they had on the field. I was hoping for the overtime, I felt like huntingdon had the better kicking game. However WC won Congrates to them, they should be going to state fairly easy. So does anybody know what the calls were on the kicker from huntingdon? I heard rumors that the first one was not having his mouthpiece in but idk, pretty picky officiating if thats the case

im going to have to go with the mustangs 21 - 14. i feel like it will be close in the first half but huntingdon will just wear down wc defense in the second. with that being said good luck to both teams.

Im just wonderin who yall are gonna cheer for next week when Huntingdon sends ya home. WC or the Mustangs Gotta go with my alma mater Huntingdon 35-7

I would agree with all of this but one thing warbritton is a better passer then what your placing him at. And I feel like he is better under pressure, I have seen him make some great plays scramblin around. PC def needs to make sure they stick with their man until warbritton crosses the line cause if they dont and they come up to tackle him, he will stop short and pass it to the man they just left. I have seen him do this a couple times this year. So I would say he is pretty calm under pressure. He def is a playmaker for this team.

You have not been reading my posts I have not said anything about how good or bad they are. All I have said is that they are better then what your placing them at.

Well you just proved to everyone on here that you know nothing about football and that your stuck too far up your teams butt to see the facts

Where your wrong is saying CA is better then dresden and camden.

It has its flaws, but at the same time its the best way of making it as fair as possible. It's not TSSAA's fault that the best teams end up being the closest together its all where the dots fall on the map.

So your saying Columbia Academy could beat both Camden and Dresden. The teams CA beat didnt even finish with a winning record. Both camden and dresden would stomp CA.

I agree its the same way in 2a but worse there is a 4-6 team that has 2nd seed. Its riverside in quad 3 they have the worst record between all 6 teams. And I think I get what your tryin to say about how in this quad we have 2 10-0 teams and a 9-1 team, If i understand right your saying huntingdon or one of the other top teams should have been placed in quad 4 to make a bigger game at semi to draw a bigger crowd which in turn brings in more money to all involved, which I agree with completly. However I do have to say the way they have it is pretty fair it just sucks how it played out this year, but we are guarenteed some good football for quad 3.

ok just because you brought it up I did some research and found that in yalls regular season the teams combined win-loss was 52-52 and only 5 of them made it to the play-offs which u mentioned the 4 that made it to round 2, but look at huntingdons regular season competition their opponents win-loss was 61-47 and every team they played made the play-offs and 6 of them are in the 2nd round. So just by looking at that you can tell huntingdon has played better quality teams then pc.

i did

Is there a way to watch any pc games online, cause I know Huntingdon has all of theres online.