This district is a toss-up.
TrentDilfer?'s rankings were:
I see Ezell at the bottom, but I see Hume Fogg above MLK. Gerald Robinson can't do it all himself. I was impressed with how he played but not with the rest of his team. It's only him. Hume Fogg would be above them because they held their own against both Pearl Cohn and Lipscomb, losing both by only 6. I see CPA and FRA as a toss up still. I will have to see them play Jan. 5th to see who should really rank above who... but as of now, I have FRA barely ahead because of their performance against teams they've both played.
Against DCA
FRA 58 DCA 48 | FRA 59 DCA 51 (after a slow start.)
CPA 55 DCA 47
Because of FRA's most recent game against DCA, this is too close to determine.
Against Goodpasture
FRA 54 GP 38 | FRA 67 GP 40
CPA 93 GP 52
FRA held GP to 40 or less points and CPA allowed 52. FRA's defense is stronger (by the numbers) but CPA can score more. Once again, another toss up.
Against MLK
FRA 54 MLK 49
CPA 55 MLK 67
Once again, CPA's defense giving up more points and both teams scoring the same amount against MLK's defense. I'd give this to FRA.
Against Nashville Christian
FRA 66 NCS 59
CPA 81 NCS 68
CPA's defense giving up more points once again. Each team could have put in their bench players to give them some time and they could have given up. Because NCS is not that strong of a team. This is once again a toss-up.
Out of the 4 games, FRA has one advantage (MLK win). In order to really pick who's above who, I'll have to see the game on the 5th.
Pearl Cohn at #2 because I have yet to see them play but I have only heard that they are a very strong and athletic team, but only beat Hume Fogg by 6.
Lipscomb as a consensus #1. They have big wins against strong teams and they can consistently get their points way up there.
My rank is:
1. DL
2. PC
3a. CPA
3b. FRA
5. HF
6. MLK
7. EH
What do you think about my rankings and matchup between CPA and FRA?
Comments and criticisms appreciated.