MaroonNation77
-
Posts
43 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by MaroonNation77
-
-
this is despicably wrong... even the way "some bearden players are playing" TN high is not favored. it may not be a blowout and it will of course be "a match" but i dont believe that TN high is actually the favorite. thanks.
-
QUOTE(dawgs2 @ Apr 25 2007 - 09:01 PM) 826445381[/snapback]Science Hill won 5-1
Maltsberger over Smith 3sets
Greer over Acker 0-4
Kerr over Rahnema 6-0
Story over Fulton 5-6 Fulton had 3 set points at 5-3 in first and was up 4-1 in 2nd
S Hill guy in straight sets at 5
Eddy over Dail 4-2
Science Hill said that Wilkinson out for the year
If we play again dropping the 6 will help
1 is a toss up
2 Science Hill
3 Science Hill but it was close
4 this could go either way
5 Science Hill
win two of these matches and u never know in doubs
Science Hill the definite favorite, but crazier things have happened
Tennessee High has a chance at them because their 5 and 6 can beat Science Hills from what I heard
Siegel is a big favorite if Wilkinson is out to win it all
at number three rhanema also had 2 set points at 5-3 in the first set and lost the second point because of a questionable call. fulton at 4 was winning and had a close match which he should have won, so if bearden can win those two matches along with maltsbergers win (which was close as well) they would go into doubs up 3-2... of course bearden didnt win those two matches and i cant really justifying saying that they should have but i can say that the bearden players were winning and the matches were close so even though the overall score was 5-1 bearden is still a contender against science hill
-
QUOTE(dawgs2 @ Apr 22 2007 - 12:31 AM) 826442674[/snapback]give me the predictions
Hunter M vs Chris S
Acker vs Greer
Rahnema vs Wilinsinson
Fulton Vs Story
Dont know about 5
Doubs
Malt/Acker vs Greer/Wilk
rah/ful vs smith/story
The sad thing is if Taylor P plays I think Bearden wins no prob now they are the prohibitive underdogs
Being bearden u have got to feel terrible about the pagt two years
Should be 2 time state champ. Fulton doesnt play last year, if he does they win. Patrick doesnt play this year, if he does they win
If I were their coach id be pulling my hair out. From two rings to no rings.
i wont give specific predictions but ill tell you right now this one will come down to doubles, and bearden has very strong 1 and 2 doubles teams...it will be a good match
-
-
Bearden will continue its tradition of not playing rotary...
-
From someone not on the Webb team I will say that parks, tadd, and taylor are certainly on an upper tier compared to walling, haydek, and mackabee. Another thing, In regards to the 4-6 beating/splitting sets with the 1-3, I know that sometimes those 1-3 don't try their hardest in practice. This is obviously not good, but realistically it happens. Now, I'm not saying that its impossible for any of the 4-6 to split sets or even beat the 1-3 occasionally, but its not very likely if everyone is trying their hardest. Mackabee may think otherwise, but the line-up speaks for itself.
-
-
Anyone know who won the Science Hill vs. TN High match? It was yesterday and since TNtnns_07 didn't post that TN High won I'm assuming that they lost, but I could be wrong so does anyone know?
-
QUOTE(Harris @ Apr 3 2007 - 10:57 PM) 826429332[/snapback]Please refer to the above post where I so astutely noted your win at the tri-match. Which was at 9 am if I remember correctly. And now you have to throw up from drinking to have a hangover? Son you are in for a rude awakening, only pansies throw up. By the way, Its obvious Hunter can beat Kyle...or else he would have lost? Common sense tells "most" of us this much.
Also, what is a "wont" a ring? I understand "I go to Bearden and I won't win a state title this year." But I don't understand it in the context of "Now we wont some rings".
And for the record, I'm not loney. Just enjoy a little banter every now and then. And I'm not some 20 year old kid, although it is pretty funny to hear you say these things.
Take your own advice junior, need some wit in these posts. I mean this last post of yours, its about as good as when your mom hung up your 1st grade drawings from class on the fridgerator even though it almost caused a seizure just to look at it. I feel this need to respond out of pity just so one day you can learn how to post and actually appear to know what your talking about.
Have a nice day
Your posts are simple personal attacks on people whom you do not know. Probably due to some self-esteem issues. And speaking of wit, I am going to refrain from using any in this post (please do not attempt an insult along the lines of "where have you ever used wit" or something similar) so as to explain a few things to you. Also, thank you for pointing out the one and only typo in all of my posts, that certainly discredited my whole arguement. My whole point is that the past is the past and we (Bearden) are not giving excuses why we didn't win state, while you (not even siegel since you have no affiliation with them since you don't even live in TN) were giving an excuse for why we beat Segiel in the tri-match. Yes, at one point you did mention that we beat you...etc but just because you say it once does not validate giving an excuse for the loos afterwards. Furthermore, I am not being hypocritical because I never called siegel cocky. I may have said that Harris is talking smack, which he was, but I never said anything bad about talking smack. Please feel free to talk up your 07 team and state who you think will win. It also does not matter who Harris is. Of course I do not know who he is just as he does not know who I am, but the point I was trying to make was that whoever he is he doesn't play for siegel (as he has already said) and he is obviously not the siegel coach (because he stated that he no longer lives in TN). Harris obviously enjoys posting on message boards (with almost 5,000 posts) and obviously believes that his "witty banter" is far superior to the logic which I have portrayed (although I do believe my wit surpasses his, but I really do not care). And Harris, please refrain from immature insults such as "Me>You" or references to my beautiful first grade drawings on the REFRIGERATOR. It is not clever and simply makes you seem like an arrogant fool. Also, what is a "loney"?
-
Very informative post. Thanks for your input I'll take that into consideration and get back to you. But, it's kind of late and I think my tennis club is closed... Good try at a clever insult, though. Take some tips from Harris, hes got some wit to him. Oh I've got one...If you spent half the time you spend reading the crap I write on on here as you did on the tennis court you might actually beat a Bearden player for once. How was that? Any input for me? I also couldn't help but notice that you have posted 239 posts on coacht while I have only posted 37... can you do simple math or is that in next year's curriculum?
Also, I find it funny that you said this earlier in this topic:
"The top three schools in this order are: Bearden, Siegel, Science Hill
Tennessee High is the next in line, but its a big step down from those three, West TN has a few decent teams but they don't have alot of depth."
-
I am well aware of what you are talking about and I don't see how saying "whatever choices a player makes that effects his game is his fault. Furthermore, the match was not even early in the morning and whatever stupid things the players did the night before would not have effected them that much, or else I dont believe they would have done them" would lead you to think otherwise... If you can't play with a hangover why would you engage in activities that would result in one the day before a tennis match? As I was trying to say before I doubt it had as much effect as you claim (meaning I doubt they drank so much that would actually have a bad hangover which, in my book, would require puking and I didn't see any of that going on) because I doubt the siegel players are that stupid...I may be wrong. Learn to drink, especially if your going to do it the night before a tough tennis match, even if its because you want to have an excuse if you lose (or just learn to make up better excuses). Either that or next time try some potasium pills, I hear they work like a charm.
-
QUOTE(Harris @ Apr 3 2007 - 12:30 AM) 826428669[/snapback]LOL Entertaining stuff boys.
Well Webb I'm sorry you have had enough, I'll keep that in mind in future posts.
Also Maroon, what excuses did you hear? I saw one that you could deem as "excuse", you see something nobody else did? This quote up here, leads me to believe you wouldn't really know what I am talking about. Never said it wasn't Siegel's fault because it was, should have taken some Chaser plus at least, I hear that stuff works like a champ.
And to answer the ring question, That is not even my hand. Heck, I don't even live in Tennessee anymore /wink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=";)" border="0" alt="wink.gif" /> . But you keep thinking I'm one of those Siegel players. I never talk like Wishing is the 2nd coming, I know who can beat him and who he can beat. In all honesty, Him and parks can both beat each other, it all depends on how they both play, but neither is completely superior over the other, like for instance, me over you. And as nation_supp said, Siegel was disappointed to hear Bearden lost, wanted that rematch.
And also Webb, Why do you trash Siegel's competition when you denied the opportunity to play them this year? You were called about a tri match this year before Carter but you guys declined as I heard it. So note to self: That arguement doesn't work.
Also maroon, Why do you talk trash and say "Bearden will have the last laugh...I hope". If your confident say it...Bearden will Win, say it to yourself bud come on. But Oh Wait, your not sure because just like last year, there is that chance that the Bearden BULLDOGS, as you so kindly informed me, will choke once again. Get back to me when you are confident what your saying is true and not just spouting off what you "hope" will happen.
In the end boys, there is only one indicator of future success that can be labeled as true fact, and those are statistics. Statistics such as past performances, experience, players lost from the year before, etc.
For instance: Bearden says they will win it, says this year will be different, but what do they have to back that up---Nothing besides the words of their mouth and a win in a tri-match and a nice choke job in sectionals or regionals? last year.
You say Siegel is talking trash, all they have said is that they will be there in the end, which as best we can tell, is probably fact. They have been there the last two years, lost to Brentwood in 2005 4-2, won it last year, lost one player with everyone else back. Chances are they will be there near the end. Especially playing the West TN team in the semi finals.
If you see something that you would call outrageous trash talking inform me, but there has been no guarantee from Siegel other than they are the defending champs(fact) and they will be players at the end this year (statistics tell us this is highly likely).
Now boys goodnight
Have a nice day
Thank you. Your posts humor me. First of all, you talk about facts yet you do not have your own facts straight.
"Also maroon, Why do you talk trash and say "Bearden will have the last laugh...I hope". If your confident say it...Bearden will Win, say it to yourself bud come on. But Oh Wait, your not sure because just like last year, there is that chance that the Bearden BULLDOGS, as you so kindly informed me, will choke once again. Get back to me when you are confident what your saying is true and not just spouting off what you "hope" will happen."
I believe if you scroll up a bit you will realize that I in fact never said "Bearden will have the last laugh...I hope." It was Webb4 that said this because since he does not play for Bearden he does not want to claim anything for us. I did mention many lines about who will recieve the years rings, however... Now, second of all, if you do not live in Tennesse and you do not play for siegel why, oh why are you posting here? A bit lonely are we? But, I will overlook the fact that you should not even be posting here because of how much I enjoy your posts.
"In all honesty, Him and parks can both beat each other, it all depends on how they both play, but neither is completely superior over the other, like for instance, me over you."
This is a much more realistic claim (as opposed to the bogus "7/10" statistic you posted earlier). Speaking of statistics, what is siegel's record againts Bearden? Oh, thats right 0-1. Now, I am in no way saying that Bearden is for sure better than siegel; of course I think that but I know that you think the opposite. I am merely saying this in response to Harris saying that we have nothing to back up my claim that we will win, when in fact we do: we beat the state champs.
"Maroonnation, you say we are cocky yet you just predicted your team to win the state championship, and the season has hardly started. A little hypocritical, are we?"
No offense, but I do not believe that is the correct usage of hypocritical there. I know what I'm saying sounds cocky, but it's just a response to Harris's bashings. And yes, siegel plays good teams, but they do not face competition before state which is what I was trying to say in response to Harris saying that siegel will be there in the end. Yes, they will because they don't play any worthy teams in their reason (which is why you have to scheduale out of region matches for practice).
Obviously we have proven ourselves as a threat; we wanted recognition last year and we got that. Now we wont some rings and we will get those too. I have no problem with saying we will beat you all because I truly believe that, but I also have no problem with you all saying it back because I'm sure you truly believe that you will too. I do, however, have a problem with excuses. Nation_supp was man enough to admit "Maltsberger has proven that he can beat Kyle...we all know this." That is no more or no less than the truth. Hunter did not prove that he is better or worse than Kyle, but merely that he can beat him.
Yes, you all have "statistics" to back up your claim as well (you all as in nation_supp and the rest of your team not Harris since he doesn't play for siegel and probably isn't even in high school...) but please do not try and dismiss the fact that we beat you. Talk about how your going to beat us this year, not about how you should've beaten us last year just like I am talking about how we will win state this year and not how we should've won state last year.
Now Harris, you 20 something year old dude with nothing else to do but post on here, goodnight.
Ridiculous.
-
What are you the team mascot? I didn't know you get a ring for being a mascot... Well, we're the bulldogs, so check your closet for a bulldog costume, that is if your looking to get another ring.
-
Hahaha. Well of course your not talking smack...and neither am I when I say: Bearden dominated siegel in the tri-match last season despite any excuses you may come up with (I've never heard so many excuses from one team before). Yes, we did choke against Science Hill, and we can make up excuses as well such as Maltsberger cramping (and defaulting) while up on Smith, or Rahnema choking with a match point, but instead I will say Science Hill played a good match and beat us. On the other hand, however, we beat siegel. Now granted, siegel won the rings, but I believe we beat you all 7-0 (or 7-1 or something with one or two matches unfinished) which is, in my book, considered domination. Perhaps you think that is a close score; just a matter of opinion I suppose. Now on to your pitiful excuse. Even TN state's excuse about sitting around too long is better than yours; whatever choices a player makes that effects his game is his fault. Furthermore, the match was not even early in the morning and whatever stupid things the players did the night before would not have effected them that much, or else I dont believe they would have done them. Unless of course they wanted an excuse in case they lost....hmm... siegel got blown out and no far fetched excuse can change that.
Yes, Seigal will be there at the end because they face no competition, but make sure not to lose those rings because you wont be getting any more.
Have a nice life.
-
QUOTE(Harris @ Apr 2 2007 - 05:03 PM) 826428372[/snapback]Webb will win #5.
Siegel would take #4, You just said Walling doesn't play as much because of basketball.
And no David Parks will not beat Kyle if both are playing average, you said this last year or the year before with Tadd Hatcher I believe. We know how that turned out.
Oh, and I'm sorry you have a serious problem with me mentioning southern rankings
Have a nice day
I don't believe anyone has mentioned the fact that Hunter Maltsberger owned Wishing last year (I think owned would be appropriate here dont you agree Harris?) And if Hunter can beat Kyle (this is obviously undebatable because Hunter beat Kyle...no excuses please), then Parks can beat Kyle as well. Parks is most definately the better player and this is coming from someone not on either the Webb or siegel team. Of course you're going to think that Kyle would win because you either are Kyle or you play for siegel. Look at David's record and I think it is obvious that he has consistantly beaten players better than Kyle.
-
QUOTE(Harris @ Apr 1 2007 - 01:55 AM) 826427441[/snapback]TNtnns, You have a tri-match with Siegel and another team in April. Perhaps instead of getting on here throwing excuses for the beating you took, you should be on a court practicing.
Also, you will lose to Science Hill as well.
Have a nice day
I agree. TN High will lose to science hill. I take back anything I said before about TN High needing to prove themselves against Science Hill because that will not happen. Thank you and goodnight.
-
QUOTE(Webb4 @ Mar 30 2007 - 11:39 PM) 826426924[/snapback]What is ur problem? I just said that they were the better team...im gonna take it that you are one of those rich, stuck up @$#%^& that lives in the knoxville area, just like the webb boys...the only ones from webb that are actually modest are hatcher and walling and i respect them. But crist and parks are probably the most arrogant people i have ever met.
I think all you TN high people have got a case of the "kiser walk". you walk around like your great and such an opposing threat when in reality your nothing more than insecure about your team. Just because you WANT to be better than webb, bearden, siegel, etc. doesnt mean you ARE...
-
True, but I doubt Bearden will even play them. Science Hill will most likely beat TN High and Bearden will then play SH.
-
QUOTE(TNtnns_07 @ Mar 30 2007 - 10:05 AM) 826426397[/snapback]What is ur problem? I just said that they were the better team...im gonna take it that you are one of those rich, stuck up @$#%^& that lives in the knoxville area, just like the webb boys...the only ones from webb that are actually modest are hatcher and walling and i respect them. But crist and parks are probably the most arrogant people i have ever met.
Sterotyping a whole city as "stuck up @$#%^&" seems slightly arrogant to me... The fact is TN High has shown no results and while your line-up is not bad, when compared to bearden, siegel, or the unmodest webb it can not be seen as a potent threat. Second of all, when a team blows another team out (ie. webb over tn high) the winning team can hardly be called unmodest, especially if the losing team is making up bogus excuses simply so that they will be held in higher regard. In reality, making up excuses does not make other people think that your team is better but was just unlucky (since you had to wait around so long and the webb team didnt have to wait at all...somehow) but rather makes others see you as merely a sore loser who is trying to compensate for their ablility with excuses. Don't post a message saying how good your team is, instead how about winning some matches and showing us how good you are. TN high gained no players this year so I don't see them beating science hill. This is just a prediction and honestly I have no preference toward either team. Does anyone know when this match (science hill vs. tn high) is?
-
QUOTE(nation_supp89 @ Mar 29 2007 - 09:14 PM) 826426103[/snapback]S-i-e-g-e-l lol
Kyle Wishing
Chris Hale
Casey Edwards
James Hayes
David Melvin
All are the same except for the 5 where Melvin stepped in for Verble. 3 of the top 4 are seniors with Edwards being the only Junior. All return from last years State championship team. Bearden/Science Hill should be a good match this year to decide who comes out of that region.
SIEGEL...my bad. Beardens current line-up is as follows:
Hunter Maltsberger
Chris Acker
Ben Rahnema
Jimmy Fulton
James Dail
Any idea what Science Hill's line-up is?
Im guessing...
Smith
Wilkinson
Greer....
-
-
yea taylor patrick will not be playing for bearden this year but we did gain jimmy fulton. Id say knox catholic is the team to watch out for in A-AA (i think thats the right division) and bearden is still one of the favorites for the AAA state title despite losing patrick. bearden also gained james dail in the top 6 line-up and thus is still extremely deep and solid.
-
How about Christopher Williams from West??? He should take the AAA state singles title.
-
Please post all district results...Bearden def. Farragut 5-1 in District 4.
White House girls tennis player signs
in Tennis
Posted
I also heard that Adam Baker was playing for Vandy...but that may have been you that told me that.