MaroonNation77

I also heard that Adam Baker was playing for Vandy...but that may have been you that told me that.

this is despicably wrong... even the way "some bearden players are playing" TN high is not favored. it may not be a blowout and it will of course be "a match" but i dont believe that TN high is actually the favorite. thanks.

at number three rhanema also had 2 set points at 5-3 in the first set and lost the second point because of a questionable call. fulton at 4 was winning and had a close match which he should have won, so if bearden can win those two matches along with maltsbergers win (which was close as well) they would go into doubs up 3-2... of course bearden didnt win those two matches and i cant really justifying saying that they should have but i can say that the bearden players were winning and the matches were close so even though the overall score was 5-1 bearden is still a contender against science hill

i wont give specific predictions but ill tell you right now this one will come down to doubles, and bearden has very strong 1 and 2 doubles teams...it will be a good match

We actually have wanted to play for the past two years but have not been able to.

Bearden will continue its tradition of not playing rotary...

From someone not on the Webb team I will say that parks, tadd, and taylor are certainly on an upper tier compared to walling, haydek, and mackabee. Another thing, In regards to the 4-6 beating/splitting sets with the 1-3, I know that sometimes those 1-3 don't try their hardest in practice. This is obviously not good, but realistically it happens. Now, I'm not saying that its impossible for any of the 4-6 to split sets or even beat the 1-3 occasionally, but its not very likely if everyone is trying their hardest. Mackabee may think otherwise, but the line-up speaks for itself.

Drew Kerr is a sophomore.

Anyone know who won the Science Hill vs. TN High match? It was yesterday and since TNtnns_07 didn't post that TN High won I'm assuming that they lost, but I could be wrong so does anyone know?

Your posts are simple personal attacks on people whom you do not know. Probably due to some self-esteem issues. And speaking of wit, I am going to refrain from using any in this post (please do not attempt an insult along the lines of "where have you ever used wit" or something similar) so as to explain a few things to you. Also, thank you for pointing out the one and only typo in all of my posts, that certainly discredited my whole arguement. My whole point is that the past is the past and we (Bearden) are not giving excuses why we didn't win state, while you (not even siegel since you have no affiliation with them since you don't even live in TN) were giving an excuse for why we beat Segiel in the tri-match. Yes, at one point you did mention that we beat you...etc but just because you say it once does not validate giving an excuse for the loos afterwards. Furthermore, I am not being hypocritical because I never called siegel cocky. I may have said that Harris is talking smack, which he was, but I never said anything bad about talking smack. Please feel free to talk up your 07 team and state who you think will win. It also does not matter who Harris is. Of course I do not know who he is just as he does not know who I am, but the point I was trying to make was that whoever he is he doesn't play for siegel (as he has already said) and he is obviously not the siegel coach (because he stated that he no longer lives in TN). Harris obviously enjoys posting on message boards (with almost 5,000 posts) and obviously believes that his "witty banter" is far superior to the logic which I have portrayed (although I do believe my wit surpasses his, but I really do not care). And Harris, please refrain from immature insults such as "Me>You" or references to my beautiful first grade drawings on the REFRIGERATOR. It is not clever and simply makes you seem like an arrogant fool. Also, what is a "loney"?

Very informative post. Thanks for your input I'll take that into consideration and get back to you. But, it's kind of late and I think my tennis club is closed... Good try at a clever insult, though. Take some tips from Harris, hes got some wit to him. Oh I've got one...If you spent half the time you spend reading the crap I write on on here as you did on the tennis court you might actually beat a Bearden player for once. How was that? Any input for me? I also couldn't help but notice that you have posted 239 posts on coacht while I have only posted 37... can you do simple math or is that in next year's curriculum? Also, I find it funny that you said this earlier in this topic: "The top three schools in this order are: Bearden, Siegel, Science Hill Tennessee High is the next in line, but its a big step down from those three, West TN has a few decent teams but they don't have alot of depth."

I am well aware of what you are talking about and I don't see how saying "whatever choices a player makes that effects his game is his fault. Furthermore, the match was not even early in the morning and whatever stupid things the players did the night before would not have effected them that much, or else I dont believe they would have done them" would lead you to think otherwise... If you can't play with a hangover why would you engage in activities that would result in one the day before a tennis match? As I was trying to say before I doubt it had as much effect as you claim (meaning I doubt they drank so much that would actually have a bad hangover which, in my book, would require puking and I didn't see any of that going on) because I doubt the siegel players are that stupid...I may be wrong. Learn to drink, especially if your going to do it the night before a tough tennis match, even if its because you want to have an excuse if you lose (or just learn to make up better excuses). Either that or next time try some potasium pills, I hear they work like a charm.

Thank you. Your posts humor me. First of all, you talk about facts yet you do not have your own facts straight. "Also maroon, Why do you talk trash and say "Bearden will have the last laugh...I hope". If your confident say it...Bearden will Win, say it to yourself bud come on. But Oh Wait, your not sure because just like last year, there is that chance that the Bearden BULLDOGS, as you so kindly informed me, will choke once again. Get back to me when you are confident what your saying is true and not just spouting off what you "hope" will happen." I believe if you scroll up a bit you will realize that I in fact never said "Bearden will have the last laugh...I hope." It was Webb4 that said this because since he does not play for Bearden he does not want to claim anything for us. I did mention many lines about who will recieve the years rings, however... Now, second of all, if you do not live in Tennesse and you do not play for siegel why, oh why are you posting here? A bit lonely are we? But, I will overlook the fact that you should not even be posting here because of how much I enjoy your posts. "In all honesty, Him and parks can both beat each other, it all depends on how they both play, but neither is completely superior over the other, like for instance, me over you." This is a much more realistic claim (as opposed to the bogus "7/10" statistic you posted earlier). Speaking of statistics, what is siegel's record againts Bearden? Oh, thats right 0-1. Now, I am in no way saying that Bearden is for sure better than siegel; of course I think that but I know that you think the opposite. I am merely saying this in response to Harris saying that we have nothing to back up my claim that we will win, when in fact we do: we beat the state champs. "Maroonnation, you say we are cocky yet you just predicted your team to win the state championship, and the season has hardly started. A little hypocritical, are we?" No offense, but I do not believe that is the correct usage of hypocritical there. I know what I'm saying sounds cocky, but it's just a response to Harris's bashings. And yes, siegel plays good teams, but they do not face competition before state which is what I was trying to say in response to Harris saying that siegel will be there in the end. Yes, they will because they don't play any worthy teams in their reason (which is why you have to scheduale out of region matches for practice). Obviously we have proven ourselves as a threat; we wanted recognition last year and we got that. Now we wont some rings and we will get those too. I have no problem with saying we will beat you all because I truly believe that, but I also have no problem with you all saying it back because I'm sure you truly believe that you will too. I do, however, have a problem with excuses. Nation_supp was man enough to admit "Maltsberger has proven that he can beat Kyle...we all know this." That is no more or no less than the truth. Hunter did not prove that he is better or worse than Kyle, but merely that he can beat him. Yes, you all have "statistics" to back up your claim as well (you all as in nation_supp and the rest of your team not Harris since he doesn't play for siegel and probably isn't even in high school...) but please do not try and dismiss the fact that we beat you. Talk about how your going to beat us this year, not about how you should've beaten us last year just like I am talking about how we will win state this year and not how we should've won state last year. Now Harris, you 20 something year old dude with nothing else to do but post on here, goodnight. Ridiculous.

What are you the team mascot? I didn't know you get a ring for being a mascot... Well, we're the bulldogs, so check your closet for a bulldog costume, that is if your looking to get another ring.

Hahaha. Well of course your not talking smack...and neither am I when I say: Bearden dominated siegel in the tri-match last season despite any excuses you may come up with (I've never heard so many excuses from one team before). Yes, we did choke against Science Hill, and we can make up excuses as well such as Maltsberger cramping (and defaulting) while up on Smith, or Rahnema choking with a match point, but instead I will say Science Hill played a good match and beat us. On the other hand, however, we beat siegel. Now granted, siegel won the rings, but I believe we beat you all 7-0 (or 7-1 or something with one or two matches unfinished) which is, in my book, considered domination. Perhaps you think that is a close score; just a matter of opinion I suppose. Now on to your pitiful excuse. Even TN state's excuse about sitting around too long is better than yours; whatever choices a player makes that effects his game is his fault. Furthermore, the match was not even early in the morning and whatever stupid things the players did the night before would not have effected them that much, or else I dont believe they would have done them. Unless of course they wanted an excuse in case they lost....hmm... siegel got blown out and no far fetched excuse can change that. Yes, Seigal will be there at the end because they face no competition, but make sure not to lose those rings because you wont be getting any more. Have a nice life.