Jump to content

New Tennessee Girls AAU Format


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Is this team one of hosts for the the AAU qualifing tournaments ?

Yes the Trotters do host one of the qualifying events but that makes sense. He coaches for them AND the Trotters have supported and played in AAU tournaments, sub-state/ state/ Natls, for years. They deserve one of the tournaments. Now how the new director was "crowned" king of TN AAU, that's another question. We have played AAU for many years and we were not involved in the process. Neither was anyone else I talked to locally.

 

The Flight Select was given the other local qualifier. When they first started they did not even particiapate in AAU tournaments, although they do now and have for some time.

 

We, Knoxville Panthers, will not be playing AAU anymore. It's clearly about big money now and that's not why we got into youth basketball nor is it why we continue to stay in it. What most teams don't realize is that The BIG clubs and AAU need you, the "mom and pop" organizations with 1, 2, 3... teams, way more than you need them. Don't play in the AAU tournaments and they might change it to something more worthwhile. In fact they won't have anyone to play! If you do play now you're just paying the BIG clubs coach's salaries (like they need more money with their outlandish team fees!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Yes the Trotters do host one of the qualifying events but that makes sense. He coaches for them AND the Trotters have supported and played in AAU tournaments, sub-state/ state/ Natls, for years. They deserve one of the tournaments. Now how the new director was "crowned" king of TN AAU, that's another question. We have played AAU for many years and we were not involved in the process. Neither was anyone else I talked to locally.

 

The Flight Select was given the other local qualifier. When they first started they did not even particiapate in AAU tournaments, although they do now and have for some time.

 

We, Knoxville Panthers, will not be playing AAU anymore. It's clearly about big money now and that's not why we got into youth basketball nor is it why we continue to stay in it. What most teams don't realize is that The BIG clubs and AAU need you, the "mom and pop" organizations with 1, 2, 3... teams, way more than you need them. Don't play in the AAU tournaments and they might change it to something more worthwhile. In fact they won't have anyone to play! If you do play now you're just paying the BIG clubs coach's salaries (like they need more money with their outlandish team fees!).

 

You are right they need us more than we need them. This is the biggest money grabbing scam I have ever seen in youth athletics!!

 

If you don't know the whole story let me lay it out for you. If you participate in less than all of the qualifying tournaments you my be punished when it comes to seeding the state tournament. The team that has the highest ranking based on participation and how well they finished in each tournament will get a 1 seed at the state tournament. This is nothing but a way to pressure you into taking your team to as many of these as possible. WHY??? So you can fund their teams that's why!!

 

The new state director stated that he talked with many organizations before going with this format. All of the teams he told me he spoke with had no idea who he was.

 

Once again AAU got it wrong. The problem all along has been the money!! Teams are required to register, get cards and pay to compete at sub-state. You are talking about roughly $350-$400 for in many cases 2 games. So their fix. Add the qualifiers for $200 and $350 for the state tournament. So every team no is required to pay a minimum of $700 to play AAU. So the fees have doubled and maybe you get two more games. Sounds like a bargain to me??

 

It is also funny that all of the big teams got the qualifiers. Well on second thought NO it doesn't. They sure want their piece of this new cash cow. It is not enough that they charge their kids $500-$1000 to be on the team now we are forced to fund them as well.

 

I say we boycott!!! If you have a good team only play the minimum required 1 qualifier and play the state. I will only play AAU with my national team. All of my other teams will play local playdays and tournaments. There are plenty of well run Playdays and tournaments that I would much rather give my money too!!

 

We don't have to keep holding our noses as they try to feed us manure, all the while telling us it doesn't smell. We know better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are right they need us more than we need them. This is the biggest money grabbing scam I have ever seen in youth athletics!!

 

If you don't know the whole story let me lay it out for you. If you participate in less than all of the qualifying tournaments you my be punished when it comes to seeding the state tournament. The team that has the highest ranking based on participation and how well they finished in each tournament will get a 1 seed at the state tournament. This is nothing but a way to pressure you into taking your team to as many of these as possible. WHY??? So you can fund their teams that's why!!

 

The new state director stated that he talked with many organizations before going with this format. All of the teams he told me he spoke with had no idea who he was.

 

Once again AAU got it wrong. The problem all along has been the money!! Teams are required to register, get cards and pay to compete at sub-state. You are talking about roughly $350-$400 for in many cases 2 games. So their fix. Add the qualifiers for $200 and $350 for the state tournament. So every team no is required to pay a minimum of $700 to play AAU. So the fees have doubled and maybe you get two more games. Sounds like a bargain to me??

 

It is also funny that all of the big teams got the qualifiers. Well on second thought NO it doesn't. They sure want their piece of this new cash cow. It is not enough that they charge their kids $500-$1000 to be on the team now we are forced to fund them as well.

 

I say we boycott!!! If you have a good team only play the minimum required 1 qualifier and play the state. I will only play AAU with my national team. All of my other teams will play local playdays and tournaments. There are plenty of well run Playdays and tournaments that I would much rather give my money too!!

 

We don't have to keep holding our noses as they try to feed us manure, all the while telling us it doesn't smell. We know better.

 

Great post and breakdown! Better yet do not participate at all and let "them" have an inter-squad scrimmage at state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Great post and breakdown! Better yet do not participate at all and let "them" have an inter-squad scrimmage at state.

 

 

Sounds like the light bulb has finally come on. This is not about the kids playing the game. This has become about the money and the coaches trying to build a reputation. The more you win, the more you are able to sell the crap that your program is the ticket to a college scholarship. Then the more you can charge. Wow! Sure beats what you make teaching and coaching in most public school systems.

Let me see....if I can get a stud from Georgia, maybe another from Kentucky and a third from N.C. , I can travel around the country kicking some butt. The only thing I will need is to convince 8-10 local families to write a nice size check to fund all of this. Maybe I can convince those naivetes that their kid is really our missing ingredient.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • A little confused.  What charter/prep schools made it to state in Baseball?  
    • Fortuitously encountering Clint amidst the ambience of Goodyear this morning sparked an impromptu yet intellectually stimulating conversation, wherein we engaged in a rigorous assessment of prospective candidates for the esteemed role of head football coach. Our discourse, characterized by its spontaneity and depth, led to the formulation of astute observations and discerning judgments regarding the suitability of various individuals for this pivotal position. Allow me to elucidate the fruits of our collaborative contemplation: This commentary endeavors to offer a discerning articulation of my subjective viewpoint, emphasizing a conscientious commitment to maintaining impartiality and refraining from any semblance of derogation directed towards individuals.  Those who possess meritorious qualifications for the esteemed head coaching role, delineated without hierarchical precedence, include: Rennard Woodmore, an esteemed alumnus of the Yellow Jackets, presents a magnificent pedigree, having held prominent positions in head coaching capacities across various regions. His pivotal role as a coordinator for teams contending for state championships further enhances his stature in the realm of football leadership. Kyle Gregory, erstwhile adorned in the resplendent gold insignia, though lacking direct head coaching experience, brings to the fore his invaluable insights garnered as a coordinator for esteemed teams, showcasing an acute understanding of the requisites for triumph whilst attired in the esteemed purple and gold regalia. Steven Jackson, whose contributions transcended mere clipboard duties under the tutelage of Kevin Creasy, emerges as an exceptional candidate for Trousdale County. His prior tenure and triumphs as an assistant coach underscore his suitability for the role. The sole drawback lies in his lack of affiliation with Trousdale County as an alumnus. Brandon Eden's extensive tenure within the chronicles of Trousdale County football, spanning a significant portion of its State Championships, coupled with his successful stints as a coordinator across diverse locales, underscores his candidacy despite a dearth of direct head coaching experience at the high school level. Davy Cothron, while beset by a modest playing career, has emerged as a luminary in offensive strategy, drawing parallels to the transformative appointment of Barker in 2015, thereby warranting consideration for his proven acumen in this realm. Joshua Hackett, notwithstanding his non-alumnus status, has left an indelible imprint across Middle Tennessee, distinguished by his adept curation of formidable defensive units as a coordinator at Watertown, albeit without direct head coaching experience. Kevin Creasy, the epitome of coaching prowess, merits an offer irrespective of his current inclinations, his unparalleled capacity to secure victories transcending geographical and institutional bounds, potentially extending to a role as Director of Schools should it align with his aspirations. Conversely, individuals who have not demonstrably earned the mantle of head coaching, enumerated without sequential precedence, encompass: Brad Waggoner David Barker Paul Pitts Jeremy Pruitt Clint Satterfield Robbie Atwood Wesley Satterfield Ben Johnson BJ West Whom do you all deem most fitting to assume the mantle of the next coach, and what rationale informs your choice? Conversely, whom do you perceive as ill-suited for the role, and what underpins your reasoning for their exclusion?
    • He's a Clinton fan.  But I wouldn't admit that either.  
    • Their any schedule out their for team camp?
    • This sums it all up to perfection.  
×
  • Create New...