UT did look better as a whole... the line looked good, the receivers looked better, backs were running hard, and the playcalling was better.. with all of this said who is gonna be that guy that is gonna say ainge really looked that good... you scored 35 points (2 horrible tackles by the corner, 1 case of bad tackling, 1 busted coverage, and 1 let me repeat 1 good scoring drive)... 3 balls ainge threw should have been picked not just one and one should have tied the game 7-7 b/c he would have easily scored if he breaks on the ball (and if you go back and listen to the dude calling the game he said doesnt ainge look a little late with bout 5 minutes left in the first half)... he made 3 good plays i think all game (1 being the nice touch he put on the ball hitting someone on a little seam route, 2 he threw the ball away which shows hes maturing, and 3 he checked off to a run which went for bout 15 yards.. and honestly that is it).. so i just want to know what everyone really thinks about the offense
*yes i rewatched the whole game after my brother said that cal played horrible D... UT might have scored 14 points against an SEC defense.. but as a whole the people on the O did look bigger stronger and faster