Jump to content

why gp & seymour dont play


nftc
 Share

Recommended Posts

Look back in the Mountain Press history. I know it's difficult to believe that GP wouldn't schedule them, but that is what happened. I'm not trying to blast GP. I was just telling the truth. And as far as JV or Freshmen, that is not even close to the same. If you're going to compare JV with Varsity, then GP should play PF because that's all they have to be proud about.

 

The June 26, 2005 issue of the Mountain Press discusses GP's schedule for the 2005 and 2006 seasons. In the article by Jim Davis, Coach Hammands' cited the size difference in GP and Seymour as the reason Seymour was left of the schedule ( GP's enrollement = 588, SHS's enrollement = 1079). I believe if Coach Hammonds thought his team could not compete, he would turn in his resignation tomorrow. Maybe you need to check your facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The June 26, 2005 issue of the Mountain Press discusses GP's schedule for the 2005 and 2006 seasons. In the article by Jim Davis, Coach Hammands' cited the size difference in GP and Seymour as the reason Seymour was left of the schedule ( GP's enrollement = 588, SHS's enrollement = 1079). I believe if Coach Hammonds thought his team could not compete, he would turn in his resignation tomorrow. Maybe you need to check your facts.

 

 

Maybe you should attempt(that means try) to use common sense. Why would GP drop them if Hammonds thought they could compete? That makes no sense. The reason you do not play someone is because you have NO chance at winning. Great research on the enrollment, although that was not the article I was talking about. :thumb:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe you should attempt(that means try) to use common sense. Why would GP drop them if Hammonds thought they could compete? That makes no sense. The reason you do not play someone is because you have NO chance at winning. Great research on the enrollment, although that was not the article I was talking about. :justwrestle:

You keep talking facts and articles. Prove it. Give the date of the article. Give credit to the writer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You keep talking facts and articles. Prove it. Give the date of the article. Give credit to the writer.

 

 

I heard that he said that if we didn't he would. It was like so totally obvious that GP and PF were totally like arguing and like it was all his fault because like it just was. and PF was like whatever, and then GP was like whatever, so they were both just like whatever. So i think GP and PF should just like totally do whatever and just you know be like whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard that he said that if we didn't he would. It was like so totally obvious that GP and PF were totally like arguing and like it was all his fault because like it just was. and PF was like whatever, and then GP was like whatever, so they were both just like whatever. So i think GP and PF should just like totally do whatever and just you know be like whatever.

 

WHAT?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WHAT?

 

 

Mr. Serious has obviously had a little too much to drink. The article was one of those side briefs that do not tell the writer. I have looked on the web site but cannot find it. I'm just going off of memory, though. I'm not trying to bash GP. I hope they do well every year. I just thought I remembered how that article went.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard that he said that if we didn't he would. It was like so totally obvious that GP and PF were totally like arguing and like it was all his fault because like it just was. and PF was like whatever, and then GP was like whatever, so they were both just like whatever. So i think GP and PF should just like totally do whatever and just you know be like whatever.

 

Great reply.

 

I think you summed up this thread, like completely, dude...... or dudette, as the case may be. Me-thinks that people squabble over, like entirely random things, and if they would just try to get along, then, like, they could just be, like, whatever..........., you know?

 

Now, isnt that better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The June 26, 2005 issue of the Mountain Press discusses GP's schedule for the 2005 and 2006 seasons. In the article by Jim Davis, Coach Hammands' cited the size difference in GP and Seymour as the reason Seymour was left of the schedule ( GP's enrollement = 588, SHS's enrollement = 1079). I believe if Coach Hammonds thought his team could not compete, he would turn in his resignation tomorrow. Maybe you need to check your facts.

 

How does the fact that Coach Hammonds didn't want to play them because of their size tell you anything different than he thought GP couldn't compete. GP has never stepped up and played any competition. Why dont they play Sevier Co. One reason they cant compete. Benny is not stupid, he knows how to shedule wins. Name the last team to beat GP in both games of a two year contract that GP put back on their shedule. I am sure your only response is going to be bashing PF, and thats fine. Just take a minute and try to look through something besides your "athletic gold" glasses and realize that Coach Hammonds was just trying to save face by not losing to Seymour every year from here on out. By the way, what was the score of the last gp/seymour game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to know which issue that was because I don't believe Coach Hammands would say that. If he believed that he would not have scheduled a preseason scrimmage with Sullivan South or a Freshman/JV game with Seymour.

 

Please tell me you are not trying to use a scrimmage and a freshman game as stepping up and playing quality opponents! Thats good!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

pffan you are dogging your team. You were beat as bad as any of GP's "non quality" opponents, and they showed mercy on you ... so where does that put PF? A small step above west greene (Who you make fun of and they gave GP a better game)

 

Pretty easy to see we were not a quality win this year. I wish that wasn't the case, but it was. We will get better and I hope that when we do we play quality competition to prepare for the playoffs. I never made fun of West Greene, but I think even they would admit they are not a team that prepared you to win a playoff game. I guess I just don't understand how 10-0 and out in first round is considered a great year. Sure it was a good year, but if you are truly a state powerhouse, then shouldn't you be competing for state championships every once in a while or at least getting deep in the playoffs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


×
  • Create New...