Jump to content

SCott vs. Coalfield


magic123
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE(bob367 @ Feb 4 2007 - 12:27 AM) 826357622[/snapback]

i think coalfield will win this one,... they have all there players unlike last time!!!coalfield has been playin really good together lately!! coalfield by 5 or 10!!!

 

 

Scott by 20 ...Scott hasnt played on there homecourt in 6 or 7 games..it will be tough for coalfield to beat them. If they can shut down gunter they should win big

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(King James @ Feb 4 2007 - 12:53 PM) 826357923[/snapback]

Scott by 20 ...Scott hasnt played on there homecourt in 6 or 7 games..it will be tough for coalfield to beat them. If they can shut down gunter they should win big

 

 

dude ur just bout crazy man scott will win by 50 or so just like last time cas coalfield stinks and plus bid vw is gonna dunk it tonight so they better be ready scott by 55

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(bob367 @ Feb 4 2007 - 12:27 AM) 826357622[/snapback]

i think coalfield will win this one,... they have all there players unlike last time!!!coalfield has been playin really good together lately!! coalfield by 5 or 10!!!

 

 

man u r bout crazy too they cant stop dusty griffith or big vw so i think coalfield will choke just like time and scott wins by 35

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well it was scott-55 coalfield-54.....Scot had them down by 28 or 19 at one point and just lost all of their focus because they thought it was already over and they had own but coalfeild still had some gas left in their tanks to pull it within one....I saw #3 from coalfeild run out on the ref becuase he thought it should have been 5 secs....Man i hate to tell you but there was 4.8 sec as soon as the player form scott touched the ball so it was legal not to pass it in...But good resurgance by coalfeild...Scott dissappointed me by losing focus....but its all good just savin energy for CATHOLIC!!!WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thank god for joe brooks relizing how much time was on the clock, coalfields last shot was with about 6 seconds to go and joe relized it and let the ball roll around for a second to get it under 5 so he wouldnt have to throw the ball in.scott missed alot of foul shots tonight that killed them.this was a game which shouldnt have been a game but scott kept on comminting stupid turnovers to let them hang in there,but a win is a win i guess.we got to put that messy game behind us, scott travels to cak tuesday night.lets get the win boys.go scott

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(adidas23 @ Feb 6 2007 - 12:50 AM) 826360043[/snapback]

thank god for joe brooks relizing how much time was on the clock, coalfields last shot was with about 6 seconds to go and joe relized it and let the ball roll around for a second to get it under 5 so he wouldnt have to throw the ball in.scott missed alot of foul shots tonight that killed them.this was a game which shouldnt have been a game but scott kept on comminting stupid turnovers to let them hang in there,but a win is a win i guess.we got to put that messy game behind us, scott travels to cak tuesday night.lets get the win boys.go scott

 

 

thats right wat now shs won

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(foxraceing4 @ Feb 6 2007 - 01:31 PM) 826360537[/snapback]

thats right wat now shs won

 

 

good predicitons on the game coalfield getting beat by 35 or 55!! Coalfield ended up losing by one!! they one have won the game if they would have shot more the 4 free throws the whole game!!! 21-0 free throw ratio at half time!!! and 36-4 at the end of the game!!! and coalfield was getting fouled to but no wistle!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(bob367 @ Feb 7 2007 - 08:18 PM) 826362649[/snapback]

good predicitons on the game coalfield getting beat by 35 or 55!! Coalfield ended up losing by one!! they one have won the game if they would have shot more the 4 free throws the whole game!!! 21-0 free throw ratio at half time!!! and 36-4 at the end of the game!!! and coalfield was getting fouled to but no wistle!!!

 

 

the refs didnt loose u all the game..scott thought they had the game one just like addias said they overl ooked them...and good heads up play by joe brooks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...