FutbolMan Posted May 4, 2007 Report Share Posted May 4, 2007 QUOTE(wbcsoccer11 @ May 4 2007 - 02:57 PM) 826451760[/snapback]SD has been demolishing cupcakes, and they have trouble putting away teams they should beat (Seymour). I wouldn't consider Seymour a cupcake SD had all their players dominated the first half but couldn't get past a great seymour defense and in the second seymour dominated and just couldn't finish hey you seymour jv player. actually no we didnt have all our players. one of our starting defenders was out. then we played a man down for about 20 minutes b/c of the terrible red card call. so actually you dont know what the heck your talking about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wbcsoccer11 Posted May 4, 2007 Report Share Posted May 4, 2007 QUOTE(FutbolMan @ May 4 2007 - 01:11 PM) 826451771[/snapback]hey you seymour jv player. actually no we didnt have all our players. one of our starting defenders was out. then we played a man down for about 20 minutes b/c of the terrible red card call. so actually you dont know what the heck your talking about. well seymour had one of their starting defenders out as well not to mention a forward so any more excuses and the red card was right on Brent Bell even said he wasn't smart in his challange and he had been doing things like that all year and so i do know what i am talking about im a genius with a insight from one of your coaches QUOTE(dins8 @ May 4 2007 - 01:08 PM) 826451769[/snapback]Seymour was not one of the teams that I was referring to as a cupcake. I would never be specific about a team that I think is a "cupcake." I was just saying that I thought SD should have had an easier time with Seymour. No offense to either team. no offense taken Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdhsdefender14 Posted May 4, 2007 Report Share Posted May 4, 2007 QUOTE(wbcsoccer11 @ May 4 2007 - 02:18 PM) 826451777[/snapback]well seymour had one of their starting defenders out as well not to mention a forward so any more excuses and the red card was right on Brent Bell even said he wasn't smart in his challange and he had been doing things like that all year and so i do know what i am talking about im a genius with a insight from one of your coaches no offense taken you didnt have anyone missing. i talked to spencer proctor during the game and he said they didnt have any missing. and come on. how can you say seymour dominated the game with their great defense. the ref was calling offsides when he was looking the total opposite way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigL Posted May 4, 2007 Report Share Posted May 4, 2007 QUOTE(wbcsoccer11 @ May 4 2007 - 01:18 PM) 826451777[/snapback]well seymour had one of their starting defenders out as well not to mention a forward so any more excuses and the red card was right on Brent Bell even said he wasn't smart in his challange and he had been doing things like that all year and so i do know what i am talking about im a genius with a insight from one of your coaches no offense taken the real thing was that we had our main defender out so we had to pull our Main offensive player #12(Burns) and throw him in the back so we were without our normal offense. But seymour does get the credit for it b/c they played a great game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wbcsoccer11 Posted May 4, 2007 Report Share Posted May 4, 2007 QUOTE(sdhsdefender14 @ May 4 2007 - 01:27 PM) 826451785[/snapback]you didnt have anyone missing. i talked to spencer proctor during the game and he said they didnt have any missing. and come on. how can you say seymour dominated the game with their great defense. the ref was calling offsides when he was looking the total opposite way. mmm... that is a new excuse anymore come on fire away ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrudder Posted May 4, 2007 Report Share Posted May 4, 2007 wbcsoccer....i hate to tell u but u r not a genius..and SD should have dominated seymour bc seymour is a team that can compete in A/AA but they shouldnt have held a candle to SD...and if what i have seen is right about #12 having to play back in defense no wonder you all tied them bc he changes everything they do...he is a very talented player and from what i have seen i believe they outshot u all by a pretty big margin but good luck to both teams in the tournaments Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wbcsoccerstud11 Posted May 5, 2007 Report Share Posted May 5, 2007 QUOTE(mrudder @ May 4 2007 - 04:21 PM) 826451832[/snapback]wbcsoccer....i hate to tell u but u r not a genius..and SD should have dominated seymour bc seymour is a team that can compete in A/AA but they shouldnt have held a candle to SD...and if what i have seen is right about #12 having to play back in defense no wonder you all tied them bc he changes everything they do...he is a very talented player and from what i have seen i believe they outshot u all by a pretty big margin but good luck to both teams in the tournaments yup but we tied and you all lost so our candles burns brighter now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R.U.R. Posted May 5, 2007 Report Share Posted May 5, 2007 QUOTE(dins8 @ May 4 2007 - 11:02 AM) 826451689[/snapback]One more thing...In fairness to SD soccer, I was not at the SD/ Maryville game, and I have only seen SD once, so I might not be getting the big picture for how good SD really is. I am just trying to make the point that rankings are frivolous until the end. Best, dins which game did you attend dins?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrudder Posted May 5, 2007 Report Share Posted May 5, 2007 yea your candle may burn a little brighter but honestly outside of your 3-2 win against carter...name one even decent team that you all have defeated this year...but i will give you credit you all arent to bad at getting a tie in games you should lose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wbcsoccer11 Posted May 5, 2007 Report Share Posted May 5, 2007 QUOTE(mrudder @ May 5 2007 - 07:47 AM) 826452317[/snapback]yea your candle may burn a little brighter but honestly outside of your 3-2 win against carter...name one even decent team that you all have defeated this year...but i will give you credit you all arent to bad at getting a tie in games you should lose Gibbs, William Blount and tied sevier county and south doyle and alcoa ties are not victories but are better than a loss which i believe you all did lose to both sevier county and south doyle pigeon forge lost to every quality opponent it faced but did beat seymour but i have said all along seymour has been a different team since that game the results speak for themself pigeon forge 9-6 Seymour 9-1-4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrudder Posted May 5, 2007 Report Share Posted May 5, 2007 good point go look at our schedlue and who we have played and then look at yours...but good luck in your tournament and i really hope u all or alcoa or carter can spring an upset against CAK or Catholic so im pulling for u all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zon Posted May 5, 2007 Report Share Posted May 5, 2007 has catholic/cak played seymour this year at any time? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.