Tiebreakers dont make sense !

[Bravey]

I dont undersand how there couls be a 3 way tie in a district .. example AE, Fulton and Gibbs all were 5-1 in district with Fulton beating Gibbs, Gibbs beating AE and AE beating Fulton .. and the top spot goes to a team Gibbs who played the 80th rated schedule in 4A .. if Fulton and AE had played the teams that Gibbs did then they would be 9-1 also ... so I guess it pays to play teams that arent good ... this playoff TSSAA thing is getting a bit ridiculous ... I cant believe they dont take into consideration any strenth of schedule .. Fulton played the 2nd toughest schedule in 4A and AE about the 50th toughest according to COACHT.

[jdn55]

strength of schedule is the next step after overall record if all three had same overall then it would go ehich team played more teams with 50 pct record or better next would have been how many of there wins were over teams with 50 pct or better records. several steps later would be overtime like scenario at nuetral site.I do agree sometimes seems like reward teams for weak schedule but in long run playing strongteams makes you strong playing weak teams you go home first round

I dont undersand how there couls be a 3 way tie in a district .. example AE, Fulton and Gibbs all were 5-1 in district with Fulton beating Gibbs, Gibbs beating AE and AE beating Fulton .. and the top spot goes to a team Gibbs who played the 80th rated schedule in 4A .. if Fulton and AE had played the teams that Gibbs did then they would be 9-1 also ... so I guess it pays to play teams that arent good ... this playoff TSSAA thing is getting a bit ridiculous ... I cant believe they dont take into consideration any strenth of schedule .. Fulton played the 2nd toughest schedule in 4A and AE about the 50th toughest according to COACHT.