Jump to content

TSSAA to discuss Coop Enrollment Figures/Determination


y2kgt46
 Share

Recommended Posts

So based on the minutes from the December meeting, Coop schools will have to possibly apply the following, if it's approved.

 

"f.Voted to table proposed Addition to Article I, Section 6 (Cooperative Programs) of the TSSAA Bylaws:
Section 6 currently reads:

Only two member schools may petition TSSAA annually for permission to have a cooperative program in any sport if one of the schools does not have that program and has not had that program for the last five years. The Executive Director of TSSAA may approve such cooperative programs subject to approval by principal of schools involved, the governing board of the schools involved, and the Board of Control.

Addition:

Schools that have a cooperative program will be classified in the sports in which the cooperative program exists by using the smaller number of the following calculations.
1.Combined enrollment of the two schools involved in the cooperative program.
2.Applying a multiplier of 1.8 to the larger of the two schools involved in the cooperative program.

Submitted by McKenzie High School

g.Amended and approved the proposed Addition to Article I, Section 6 (Cooperative Programs) of the TSSAA Bylaws:
Public and charter schools may form cooperative agreements only with other public and charter schools. Independent schools may form cooperative agreements only with other independent schools.

Submitted by Harding Academy"

 

So that being said, is the verbiage from what I underlined going to be applied to both D1 & D2 programs? If applicable to D2, does that mean the D2 schools will have a multiplier added...??

It will be interesting to see how this will be applied, if approved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recent Posts

    • TSSAA restrictions for hiring non-faculty coaches have been removed for over a year at this point. In the past a non-faculty person had to be "grandfathered" by being an assistant coach for five years, being fingerprinted, and having a background check run per TSSAA rules... since those were rescinded, the board of directors for the school district are responsible for any/all restrictions on hiring non-faculty personnel. I guess what I'm saying to you is that if you really wanted what you posted, it's already possible as long as your local BOE will allow for it.
    • stop it, rlh. you’re gonna get me all misty eyed and sentimental.    i see seven fairly regularly. ….but slim shady, that’s like spotting bigfoot on main street. you just hope he doesn’t spot you. 
    • Are you trying to say you didn't find Seven and ShadySlim going at it?
    • hey goat! how’s monterey looking this year?! 
    • several people actually. they said “snoball, do you know who railbird81 is on coacht?” I said, “never heard of her.” they said, “you ought to check it out they’re getting fired up on there like the old days.” well, you can imagine my disappointment when I came here expecting sharp, witty banter and all i found was more akin to toddlers slap fighting. and what looks like 1 guy/gal talking to themselves with multiple accounts.
×
  • Create New...