At the risk of turning this into a ref discussion: Type 1: Your right that the refs don't often decide the games unless the kids do not adjust, and that is on the kids. Type 2: It is a shame when the refs don't let the kids play, blowing lots of stupid whistles, but as long as it is the same at both ends it does not affect the outcome. Type 3: Refs let to many real fouls go, even when this is the same at both ends, this works in favor of teams that can't defend well without fouling and usually leads to injuries. TSSAA should be an guard on this point. Type 4: The pet ref with an interest intent on affecting the outcome of a game. They are out there and need to be eliminated. The tough part is that when these refs are calling games they are disinterested in, they look like good refs.
On to the boys... Cascade is a tough team and the Community game was awsome entertainment. I still think Community puts the most talented team on the court. Cascade and Eagleville have a few players that can take control on any given night, and both play a disruptive scheme on both ends, which makes thier weaknesses less of a factor. I wish our boys played as intense on every play all night the way they do.