dandy82

My goodness, I think I'm in love...not only does she fish, but she loves hockey..... /blush.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":blush:" border="0" alt="blush.gif" /> McCain gets my vote.

Fortunately for us, McCain isn't presumptuous enough to build a greek castle on a football field and come floating in like a god. But I understand why BO did it.... he is all fluff and no substance...this grandeous entrance and Brittney built rock star set covers his inexperience....Which I give BO a lot of credit, he understands what makes the liberal tick...... emotion....He created it and could have said anything, he could have just moved his lips and that crowd would have drooled... That is why, when he left the stage, it was like a giant balloon burst, the messiah left and 85k were left wondering how to get out.

/roflol.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":roflol:" border="0" alt="roflol.gif" /> Nice spin....But Mccain did not give up the inexperience argument at all... two years ago obama was conducting gettogethers in chicago....And BO chose a "wise old" two time loser that garnered 1 % of the vote in his bid to be President this time around. If BO wanted a 'wise old" politican he should have chosen one with 18 million votes in her hip pocket, not a guy who has a tendency to run off at the mouth....BO will live to regret his choice. I would compare her to pelosi, but unlike Pelosi, she held to her word when elected and cleaned up....... But I like the "I can promise you" line you used......LOLOL...god, that is funny.

Speaking of taxes, noticed the BO # on who he will tax (more) has changed..... first, it was over 250K, now the # is 200K.....where will the # be next???? Then he made the statement that 95% of Americans would get a tax break from him, but I can't get the #'s to jive. Here are the breakdowns: Top 25%.... 55K (gross) Top 10%....92k (gross) Top 5%......128k (gross) If BO's statement is true (and who knows), then wage earners over 128K will get their taxes raised, well below the 200 or 250K figure he has thrown out in the past. In lite that the top 25% pay 84% of all taxes and the top 5% are gouged at a 54% clip, just how much more is BO gonna take???? before he destroys the economy. Seems "the rich" start @ 128K. also noticed that BO stated Mccain voted with the President 90% of the time and Biden said 95% of the time.....

To the media, she is not a woman, she is a republican.

If he delivered the details, people would find out he is gonna tax the bejeebers outta everyone.

/roflol.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":roflol:" border="0" alt="roflol.gif" /> /roflol.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":roflol:" border="0" alt="roflol.gif" /> /roflol.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":roflol:" border="0" alt="roflol.gif" /> Yep, she is a keeper....

She is fiscally conservative, pro drilling, (who would have thunk ...LOL) has 5 children, and from what I have been told,the last she knew would be born with Downs syndrome, but chose to give birth to the child......So she appears to be pro life. She kinda trashes the BO "glass ceiling" about women....

Noticed that when BO talked of afghanistan and sending troops the crowd didn't quite cheer as loud...And when he spoke of personal responsibility, I believe I heard a murmer or two.... He did a good job, though, of tying together that gov't can do everything for you if you show personal responsibility.....and I loved the avenue he used to be both pro and anti gun, pro and anti gay and a couple of other points where he took both sides. But for the most part he worked them up into a frenzy and they were on top of the world.... Then he left the stage and reality probably creeped in, like I gotta leave this crowded stadium and go back to my job.

Well, the BO has spoken..... and the whole crowd intertwined with the obamessiah and joined the mile high club......

http://tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=9c1e...85-3cb0b477a4df

This is the running result of a comcast poll that anyone can partake if you go to comcast.net http://my.att.net/s/commoditynews.dll?type...es&pid=4653

Yeah, it does.....Why I posted it even though a little long..... But the clinton speech is what happens when you have a bunch of people who do not care to prove what is being fed to them.

Beck has a way that cuts thru the crap.

http://finance.comcast.net/www/news.html?x.../28/1045130.xml http://finance.comcast.net/www/news.html?x.../28/1045130.xml

This is a little long, but I found this in a blog and I'm sure no media outlets will pick up this information. Just in time for Barack Obama's Greco-Roman Oration tomorrow night, two significant economic reports have gone or are about to go in a positive direction: Earlier Wednesday, the Census Bureau reported that durable goods orders increased 1.3% during July, repeating June's performance; shipments of durables were up 2.5%; and unfilled orders were at their highest level since 1992. There are exceptions, but these companies are generally very busy.Thursday morning, the pundits are predicting that second quarter Gross Domestic Product, originally estimated at an annualized 1.9%, will be significantly revised upward. Predictions that GDP will come in at 2.7% are at Reuters, Briefing.com via CNN, and MarketWatch. If you go to the links, especially the second and third, you will detect the distinct aroma of sour grapes; the headlines found there are "The economic growth mirage" and "Big revision in GDP won't mean much," respectively.Don't count on these statistics to get much positive traditional media play while the Obama coronation is in progress. But there's one other number that's even worse for the everyone's-a-victim crowd than those just noted. It is one that I can almost guarantee will remain invisible during tomorrow's festivities. That number -- .463 -- comes from the Census Bureau, as noted at this WebWire release Tuesday (confirmed by reference to Page 7 of the 2007 version of "Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States"; the PDF report is the first item listed under August 26 at this link): As shown at this 2005 BizzyBlog post, the Gini index, also referred as the Gini coefficient, was .462 at the end of the Clinton administration, after rising by .029 during the previous eight years, and .008 during the previous seven. +++++++++++++++++++++++ UPDATE, August 28, 12:15 p.m.: Commenter Tony B at BizzyBlog made a valid point which makes an update necessary. The Census Bureau says in a footnote at a different page in this year's report (Page 9) that "Direct comparisons with years earlier than 1993 are not recommended because of substantial methodological changes in the 1994 ASEC." Although the Bureau's recommendation may be debatable (the Forbes author I referred to in my 2005 post either wasn't worried about this, or didn't catch it), I have added the last six words you now see in the last sentence before this Update, and have changed what follows in the rest of this post to reflect info that relates only to 1993 and later. (The second-last paragraph formerly read "Income inequality increased by 29 times as much during Clinton??™s eight years than it has during Bush??™s first seven.") +++++++++++++++++++++++ As Bush 43's administration rounds the turn and heads for home, income inequality has barely budged by a statistically insignificant .001. To the extent that the rich have become richer, the poor, and everyone in between, have on the whole benefited in virtually equal proportion. Income inequality increased by 8 times as much during Clinton's final seven years than it has during Bush's first seven. Not that they won't run with the class envy theme anyway, but it should be made known to all that the extent to which Barack Obama and his minions claim that the differences between the haves and have-nots has widened during the administration of George W. Bush is the extent to which they are not telling the truth.

http://marathonpundit.blogspot.com/2008/05...ag-in-2001.html http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine...001/No-Regrets/

Oh no.... The Ohio and Pennsylvania voters will love it when BO rises from the earth (or is he ascending from above???) from the great roman (or greek) statueque display of democratic humility...... That is their values.

Libs hate it when we call obama the "obamessiah"...... But when you have celebs like Spike Lee, comparing the obamessiah to God himself, can you blame us???? And that set...... Here is an excerpt of an interview with Spike. LEE: It means that this is a whole new world. I think...I've been saying this before. You can divide history. BB Before Barack. AB After Barack. Something to keep in mind when members of the media assert that Republicans are exaggerating the claims of messianism on the part of Barack Obama by Democrats. Oh, and enjoy the Labor Day weekend of Year One AB.

LOL.....How ironic is this..... barack hussian obama, the man of change, the celebrity cult rock star image.......is tied to Brittany Spears..LOLOLOL I believe the rock star setting obama will use tonite shows the shallowness of obama and he is more about personality and less about substance.... Remember a few weeks ago when supposedly impartial media members were angered by a McCain ad that likened Barack Obama to Britney Spears? Well, the stage that Obama will be giving his acceptance speech from Thursday evening was actually built by the same guy that designs Britney Spears' concert sets. I kid you not. As reported by the NY Post Thursday (emphasis added, photo courtesy NYP):

Here is another reason to not vote BO..... All we hear is how bad things are when in truth, there are advantages to a weaker dollar and advantages to a global market. It is obvious to anyone who listens to BO speak on the economy that he does not understand the ebb and flow that can take place economically..... He only understands how to focus on the negative and doesn't understand how the market reacts to fluctuations, many times creating positives. Tonight, BO will more than likely take some time to focus on the economy, so listen, come back tomarrow and post if you believe he understands the story below.... That ???Made in America??? sticker is looking more attractive. Second-quarter (2Q) Gross Domestic Product (GDP) was revised up from 1.9 percent growth to a higher than anticipated 3.3 percent, according to reports on August 28. Rising exports played a significant role in the expansion. According to the Commerce Department, real exports increased 13.2 percent in the 2Q of 2008, compared with an increase of 5.1 percent in the first. Real imports of goods and services decreased 0.8 percent in the first quarter and 7.6 percent in the second. The good news on exports has been falling by the wayside in the media. The Business & Media Institute's video blog, The Biz Flog, pointed out the positive news about exports back on August 6. Thanks to a weak dollar, it is now cheaper to export goods from the U.S. to other countries. But the story hasn't caught on in the mainstream media just yet. On July 16, J.P. Morgan's Bruce Kasman told James Pethokoukis, who writes the "Capital Commerce" blog at USNews.com, that trade is strong: The Charlotte Observer profiled manufacturers' rising exports on June 27: Exports from North Carolina and South Carolina increased by 15 percent, outpacing the national rate of 12 percent. National Public Radio reported on the phenomena from Cleveland, Ohio, where they spoke with Greg Gens, Vice President of Superior Products Inc. - a company that makes valves for oxygen tanks: Gens told NPR, "When we go overseas now, a dollar-denominated price is something much more competitive - if you are competing against companies that are selling in euros, for instance ... So there is an advantage as we set up and try to get product into Europe or Southeast Asia." ??”Paul Detrick is a Research Analyst at the Business and Media Institute.

Thought this was a fair representation of the tax situation of both candidates. http://online.barrons.com/article_print/SB...glenews_barrons

This is a disturbing trend affecting wildlife in the USA. Animals that were formally self sufficient are showing signs of belonging to the democratic party. [attachment=1232] ....as they apparantly have learned to just sit and wait for the government to step in a provide for their care and sustenance.

Good analogy...Because the democratic party is desparate....Why else would they trot up an inexperienced man with questionable background???? Is this the best they have???? In hindsight, thinking of dean, Gore, pelosi and reid, he is the best they got.....

Biden and both Clintons now only think (to themselves) that BO is not equipped to lead this country. Well, sometimes Bill thinks out loud about BO's inabilities, just doesn't use his name. I also noticed Bill is not hanging around for the obamessiah to project up into the air from his palactical Roman appearing stage where he will obamatize the crowd into a soddom and gomorrah moment....and if Bill won't hang around for that, he must really detest the annointed ONE. There is also the train of thought floating that Bill will know where Hill is so he is free tonite.