BlockFace20

Of course I didn't come out with these phrases myself. Evolution isn't an individualistic event. HAHA, some people are so silly. It took a long time with a mass of people pushing for change. Also, why do you have to drag the Appalachians in this! What the hey did they ever do to you. Besides, did you know that the Powells and and Gates are both part Appalachian. Coincidence? I think not, pal. And on another note, maybe you have trouble reading, but If you look a couple of posts up you will see that I have apologized to Redtwin and retracted all of my sentiments. So basically, your whole post was futile. Better luck next time. And always remember who keeps it real, Respect

Gees, when you're right you're right. I love Redtwin because he's doing the best job he can do and that's probably better than anyone else. I apologize and retract my former respective statements statments although they do hold some truth. On another note, I see I have received questions about my unique rhetoric so please allow me to divulge. "Sippin" is a simple derivation from the phrase "Sipping on some hatorade (derived from the common sports drink, gatorade)". This phrase traslates to "My goodness, is that a personal affront?" Now "squigs" and "squags" are essentially one in the same; however, their evolution is a bit more intricate if I may say. It all begain with the phrase "not at all" which eventually dropped the "not" to become "at all" which gradually morfed into "A squarred (basically abreviating the two words to their respective first letters and applying a common mathematical term, sqarred meaning the product obtained when a number or quantity is multiplied by itself)". Moving on, "A squared" invaribly dropped the "A" leaving soley "squarred" which ultimately evolved into "sqigs". "squags" is essentially a variation of the term "squigs" similar to the common saying "you say tomato, I say tomata." You get the idea. I hope I've minimized all potential damage and confusion. P.S. Anyone who attempts to disrespect the will be dealt with accordingly.

By the way if any one wants to know, my name is Kyle Travis and I play for farragut and my number is 3.

Is it just me or has the censorship gotten out of control? My last post had zero expletives in it and was not notable critizising by any means. All I was doing was noting some observations (MBA's record is 9-7 which is unarguably worse than last year 14-2) (they did not graduate many starters notably Burns, Cahill, Turk, Banker, Carolin). If Redtwin is against noting observations then he's probably into fornicating with dead animals . And I don't know about yall but I won't stand for someone who takes advantage of helpless carcasses . I say we revolt. Who's with me?!?!

Another season pretty much in the books, and it's tourney time you elephants . Enough fooling around let's get to it. Who is gonna throw down this May? Personally... I think MUS can beat any team they want right now. The only obstacle in their path is a well coached, extremely talented McCallie team. Perhaps with home field the Nados can win in the Nooga. It's a sip. Anyone else smellin' me on this one?

If Charlie Abernathy doesn't get 1st team then that is some hate. Some serious hate. He and his teammate are leading the league in points and all he will get is 2nd team. The Big 3 are sippin'. Also, if that clown Davis Chambers gets anything then the whole All State selection will be Clowntown, population Davis Chambers.

I think the score was CBHS 7 USN 6. I know CBHS won by one goal.

I'm pretty sure that C-Bros will go ahead and represent against Los Tigres. You must take heed for many surprises does the journey hold. Follow your wisdom and be sure to ration your use of the sacred dragon. Proceed with sanctity of mind, body and spirit and triumphant you will be. BE OFF!

What about the USN defense? They held MBA to only 6 goals. That's the fewest goals that any instate team has held MBA to. Granted the team defense isn't all that great the long poles are all pretty solid. Hopefully one or two might get a mention. Andrew Tumen and Matt "The Rat" Loftis is some pimps.

If you (24/7lax) is just trying to get people to say good stuff about usn, you might be dissapointed because there not a whole lot to talk about. Sure you got some indivdual talent but your team stinks and your record shows it.

USN has some contenders as does farragot

I agree with TNLAXD, it just looked like they weren't ready for the game. They have great talent but lack depth. They also looked tired.

Andrew Brandon was a very good goalie for USN in the late 90's, he is currently the USN middle school coach and is still really good, i shoot on him some times and he hasnt lost it.

Yall I'm going to keep it real. Doug is a thug.

This game is going to be awesome no matter who wins. I think victory rests on the middies because both teams have powerhouse attack who make their middies look secondary. So, I believe, which ever team's middies come to play, thier team will run away with the W and most likely the state championship.

USN calls max cypress WARTHOG

it was a good game, both teams put in their heart into it, MBA simply outplayed USN and made less mistakes, MBAs attack were very tight, they made few mistakes, and they also worked very well together, an umderrated MBA deffense also put in a great game. As expected David Regan put in a stellar preformance.

USN has a strong core of sophomores, davis chambers, carter dunham, nick kraus, peter capp, brandon berger, andrew swanson, alex harris and hawkins Entrekin are all massive contributers to the USN team. juniors ryan starnes and benny sachs were also very important to the 04 squad.

it was a good game, both teams put in their heart into it, MBA simply outplayed USN and made less mistakes, MBAs attack were very tight, they made few mistakes, and they also worked very well together, an umderrated MBA deffense also put in a great game. As expected David Regan put in a stellar preformance.

it was a good game, both teams put in their heart into it, MBA simply outplayed USN and made less mistakes, MBAs attack were very tight, they made few mistakes, and they also worked very well together, an umderrated MBA deffense also put in a great game. As expected David Regan put in a stellar preformance.

it was a good game, both teams put in their heart into it, MBA simply outplayed USN and made less mistakes, MBAs attack were very tight, they made few mistakes, and they also worked very well together, an umderrated MBA deffense also put in a great game. As expected David Regan put in a stellar preformance.

it was a good game, both teams put in their heart into it, MBA simply outplayed USN and made less mistakes, MBAs attack were very tight, they made few mistakes, and they also worked very well together, an umderrated MBA deffense also put in a great game. As expected David Regan put in a stellar preformance.

i agree, # 11 on MUS is a great face off guy, and a very good defensive short stick middie, he is also a pretty good guy, as far as i know. i talked to him after our game, and he was pretty nice, which i think is important in the game, i have alot more respect for players who are also good people off the feild.

I think that USN is an extremely under-rated team. They don't run plays consistantly so alot of the time they depend on improvisation. But they can really work the draw and dump. Charlie Brittingham, easily one of the top rated attackmen in the state, had a goal and two assist and Davis Chambers had two goals (not to mention, one was behind the back). Both teams played average that game and I think that the outcome was appropriate. However, this friday when USN meets MBA in the semi finals, they will have David Skinner, a senoir leader on the team and 3rd leading scorer, which could quite possibly provoke an upset. (thought I might throw the ninja in)

I would agree, though Baucom has greatly improved since last year, i'd say that of the two (who are no doubt both great goalies) i would rather have Regan in my net. but i have seen Rainer play, hes very talented, but i still stick to my opinion on Regan being the most trustworthy in goal. but all three are difficult to score on.