mpTigerClaw

MP's homecoming. Does MP win in big fashion or does Cornersville keep it a game? Thoughts?

Cheatham Co.

Good game CC. You guys have a well rounded team. Stats said so and you proved the stats to be true. Goood luck the rest of the season. MP, I guess it don't matter if your a run game one man show or a well balanced pass/run one man show. It looked as though tonight, as in the years past, all your eggs are still in one basket. And if that one egg breaks, seems as though the rest does too. Something ain't working. A clue maybe can be found in looking as though run teams have beaten you, and all the passing your banking on in offensive plays ain't helping you win either. Just my opinion. Tigerfan told me just trust the coaches. Well I sure ain't gonna blame the kids.

Guess Cascade needs to do some more adjusting. But then again, I guess MP needs to also. MP got their rears handed to them tonight too.

I will take a little ketchup to go along with the fries and steak,,,,,,,rflmao. Thanks for asking for it,,,,, Just love it when I'm right. Don't ya just hate it when your wrong,,,,lol.

I definitely have not seen Cheatham Co. play so all I figured some of us would have to go on is stats to in the least get a feel for what they do. First question though is who is CC's QB? #8 or #11? I noticed both have been in that posistion. CC's record in three games so far is the same as MP. (1-2) With CC winning last week against Montgomery Central 49-14. Losing first two games to Fairview 26-12 and Sycamore High 22-13 In all 3 games combined stats are. Rushing 107 carries for 553 yards for 5 TD's. #11 the work horse with 45 carries 1 TD #24 with 31 carries 1 TD #30 with 16 carries 3 TD's Passing 25 attempts with 13 completions for 243 yards for 5 TD's only throwing 2 int. #8, #11, #44 being some of the main go to guys but a few others in the mix as well. Looking as though CC is mainly a running team with some pass capabilities, it's just when they do throw it usually means throwing for a TD. Roughly half of their completions went for TD's. No defensive stats found or reported. Looks to be yet another good team MP has to face. CC seems to have several to get the ball to. Should get interesting.

Yeah, figured it was my doin's. Wireless communication not fast enough for me I guess. Wasn't doing nothing when I clicked add reply first time, so I clicked it a time or two more till it did. Thanks for the advice Butchie.

Sorry. Not sure how that triple post happened.

Not assuming cause we all know it can make something out of U and ME. I said previously in the other post that I didn't know whether Cascade has improved or not. You just said they did. Fine. I just said MP had greatly improved since that Cascade game too and that the improved MP team got beat by WC. Now are you to assume WC will not adjust and get better?? I still take WC by 2 TD's. Sorry if that steps on some toes. I could very well eat that, but I don't think so.

N

N

Absolutely wrong. #1 for MP threw those passes not because of Cascade making him, but rather cause he was coached to do what the play called for. And he was coached to try and throw 27 pass plays that game. With 18 of them being dropped or badly thrown. I will give you this much. There were several oppurtunities Cascade flushed MP's QB and he had the chance to run in open field but he did as coached by the play call, and threw the ball, but to no avail. Those 18 failed attempts of missed passes/wasted downs went a long way in helping Cascade. Sure wasn't helping MP a bit. Glad he's making better decisions now. Not trying to rehash that game out here. Just defending my analysis.

In the video, can you not clearly see #67 coming up the middle taking only one step over the goal line right at hitting #1? Putting him at the 1 yard line at impact. Cause I sure can. #1 went up and over him reaching for the goal. Princeton is over 6 foot with a 2 1/2 to 3 foot arm reach. Do the math. 1 yard line = 3 feet from goal plain. #1 gets hit in the waist while jumping up and over #67 outstrecthing 3 feet of his body over the back of the defender with another 2 1/2 to 3 feet arm stretch = TD. It really is that simple. Ref blew it. It's alright though. Not trying to argue neither. Just saying. Again let's remember the WC fans was posting on here how bad the officiating was. All I was doing was agreeing with them.

Totally agree. Wasn't really complaining though I did a good job sounding like it. Just continuing on with the WC fans griping about the Refs. Two good teams. Either deserved the W. It's just almost always with a tight, good game as such, leave it up to the officials to muck it up. Just MP fans had more to grip about than WC did is really all I was getting at. From a MP fan to the WC faithfull, same to ya, great team and good luck rest of the year.

No one should dis-service themselves comparing the MP/Cas game with the MP/WC game. Not in the least. MP went a long way in helping Cascade win that game GIVING away downs/yardage/td's in first game jitters trying to pass the ball with no success going 9 of 26 attempts and rushing only 24 for 104. Cascade didn't have to contain #1, he contained himself by just throwing the ball. Cascade only putting up 22 points against a MP defense that didn't find themselves until the SH game. And Cascade only beat that miserable MP performance by 8.. Versus this past game against WC. A totally better MP showed up to battle against WC with MP throwing 27 times completing 20 of them and rushing 28 for 145 yds. Getting yards and TD's almost every possession. Cascade may have improved. That I don't know. But MP did, and I say WC wins by 2 TD's.