Jump to content

Rule Question


daman_daman
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So the best thing to do is if the ball is going to end up inside the twenty is for the recieving team to hit it or kick it into the end zone so they will get the ball on the 20yrd line.

 

 

Not exactly, if you will notice in my answer I said the force that put the ball in the endzone was the kick. If team B intentionally kicks or bats the ball we have a penalty (illegal batting) and if the ball ends up in the end zone and the force that put it there was B's illegal bat or kick.......we now have a safety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not Exactly, it is either a touchback or safety, unless B possess the ball and fumbles and then A or the kicking team recovers in the end zone or in the field of play and advances it into the end zone after recovering the fumble by the receiving team. Of course, a fumble cannot occur unless a player was in possession of the ball. Under no circumstances can K advance a kick that is beyond the line of scrimmage or free kick line.

Edited by papatj
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not exactly, if you will notice in my answer I said the force that put the ball in the endzone was the kick. If team B intentionally kicks or bats the ball we have a penalty (illegal batting) and if the ball ends up in the end zone and the force that put it there was B's illegal bat or kick.......we now have a safety.

 

Ah...but force is NEVER a factor on kicks going into R's end zone, since these are always a touchback. And we all know that a kick is a kick until it ends, and it doesn't end until it becomes dead by rule or it is possessed by R. So even if there is a muff, bat, or kick you still have a touchback. But if there is an illegal bat or kick, you still have a penalty. The PSK spot is R's 20...but since the foul occured behind the basic spot, you penalize from the spot of the foul, half the distance to the goal. If the kick was at the 1-yard-line, half the distance, R's ball, 1st and 10 at the 1/2-yard line.

Edited by bigwes68
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah...but force is NEVER a factor on kicks going into R's end zone, since these are always a touchback. And we all know that a kick is a kick until it ends, and it doesn't end until it becomes dead by rule or it is possessed by R. So even if there is a muff, bat, or kick you still have a touchback. But if there is an illegal bat or kick, you still have a penalty. The PSK spot is R's 20...but since the foul occured behind the basic spot, you penalize from the spot of the foul, half the distance to the goal. If the kick was at the 1-yard-line, half the distance, R's ball, 1st and 10 at the 1/2-yard line.

 

 

Bigwes has to wear a white hat on Friday nights ! :thumb:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • Recent Posts

    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
    • All these college signees went yo other schools for 3 years, were getting college offers then transferred to Bearden. It’s not like this staff did much to develop them.    The BBall coaches son and the Seymour transfer were some of the most talented QBs in the region, and you guys developed them into QBs who might complete one pass a game. 
×
  • Create New...