Jump to content

Referees?


SoccerBaller07
 Share

Recommended Posts

I've seen this too. Im not going to call out a certain school, but not only have i seen refs that graduated from that school officate the game, these guys played for the same coach while they were in high school. Also, ive seen a ref whose son played and that ref was officating games in a tourny which his son's team was playing in. He was the center in one game, then the AR in the next. Not only should this not be allowed, but the ref himself should have the dignity to remove himself from calling any game which he has any affliation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have had several games where a ref has a son on the team we are playing (though the coach has called and asked if this was acceptable before hand). They were actually harder on his son's team, so that people wouldn't think there was favoritism. I think it really depends on the ref.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(BigG @ May 2 2007 - 11:51 AM) 826450075[/snapback]I have had several games where a ref has a son on the team we are playing (though the coach has called and asked if this was acceptable before hand). They were actually harder on his son's team, so that people wouldn't think there was favoritism. I think it really depends on the ref.

 

 

Agreed. I sometimes think that a ref who has some sort of connection to a school actually goes out of his way to try and make sure no one accuses him of giving a biased effort, thus making bad calls against the school that he is tied with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find that refs more often show bias against one team rather than in favor of one. They expect a team to play dirty or just don't like the players/coach/whatever. I can't imagine this comes from alumni loyalty but it could occasionally stem from old rivalries. Bias is a human trait that can't be eliminated, only recognized for self-suppression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(dins8 @ May 2 2007 - 12:56 PM) 826450134[/snapback]Agreed. I sometimes think that a ref who has some sort of connection to a school actually goes out of his way to try and make sure no one accuses him of giving a biased effort, thus making bad calls against the school that he is tied with.

 

 

But even that seems unfair. It is really a no-win situation, IMHO. To me, the best course of action would be to excuse oneself from officiating in any match if said official has any ties to that school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(supersteve17 @ May 2 2007 - 03:02 PM) 826450203[/snapback]But even that seems unfair. It is really a no-win situation, IMHO. To me, the best course of action would be to excuse oneself from officiating in any match if said official has any ties to that school.

 

I agree but this is something that will never be changed /dry.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid="

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a game the other night all 3 refs had ties to a school. One ref has had 2 children go to the school and both played soccer, boy and girl. The other ref had 2 boys who played, and the last ref's son is on the team as now. I know we may not have enough refs as it is, but you can't tell me there should ever be a game where all 3 refs are tied to the school like that. It was a district game too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a responsible ref that cares about their reputation would not ref a game that they have obvious ties to.

 

If the game does not go well... which some do not, despite good reffing... they have put themselves in a situation to be blamed because of their association.

 

Its an issue of protecting yourself and your reputation as a ref.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements

  • Recent Posts

    • Fortuitously encountering Clint amidst the ambience of Goodyear this morning sparked an impromptu yet intellectually stimulating conversation, wherein we engaged in a rigorous assessment of prospective candidates for the esteemed role of head football coach. Our discourse, characterized by its spontaneity and depth, led to the formulation of astute observations and discerning judgments regarding the suitability of various individuals for this pivotal position. Allow me to elucidate the fruits of our collaborative contemplation: This commentary endeavors to offer a discerning articulation of my subjective viewpoint, emphasizing a conscientious commitment to maintaining impartiality and refraining from any semblance of derogation directed towards individuals.  Those who possess meritorious qualifications for the esteemed head coaching role, delineated without hierarchical precedence, include: Rennard Woodmore, an esteemed alumnus of the Yellow Jackets, presents a magnificent pedigree, having held prominent positions in head coaching capacities across various regions. His pivotal role as a coordinator for teams contending for state championships further enhances his stature in the realm of football leadership. Kyle Gregory, erstwhile adorned in the resplendent gold insignia, though lacking direct head coaching experience, brings to the fore his invaluable insights garnered as a coordinator for esteemed teams, showcasing an acute understanding of the requisites for triumph whilst attired in the esteemed purple and gold regalia. Steven Jackson, whose contributions transcended mere clipboard duties under the tutelage of Kevin Creasy, emerges as an exceptional candidate for Trousdale County. His prior tenure and triumphs as an assistant coach underscore his suitability for the role. The sole drawback lies in his lack of affiliation with Trousdale County as an alumnus. Brandon Eden's extensive tenure within the chronicles of Trousdale County football, spanning a significant portion of its State Championships, coupled with his successful stints as a coordinator across diverse locales, underscores his candidacy despite a dearth of direct head coaching experience at the high school level. Davy Cothron, while beset by a modest playing career, has emerged as a luminary in offensive strategy, drawing parallels to the transformative appointment of Barker in 2015, thereby warranting consideration for his proven acumen in this realm. Joshua Hackett, notwithstanding his non-alumnus status, has left an indelible imprint across Middle Tennessee, distinguished by his adept curation of formidable defensive units as a coordinator at Watertown, albeit without direct head coaching experience. Kevin Creasy, the epitome of coaching prowess, merits an offer irrespective of his current inclinations, his unparalleled capacity to secure victories transcending geographical and institutional bounds, potentially extending to a role as Director of Schools should it align with his aspirations. Conversely, individuals who have not demonstrably earned the mantle of head coaching, enumerated without sequential precedence, encompass: Brad Waggoner David Barker Paul Pitts Jeremy Pruitt Clint Satterfield Robbie Atwood Wesley Satterfield Ben Johnson BJ West Whom do you all deem most fitting to assume the mantle of the next coach, and what rationale informs your choice? Conversely, whom do you perceive as ill-suited for the role, and what underpins your reasoning for their exclusion?
    • He's a Clinton fan.  But I wouldn't admit that either.  
    • Their any schedule out their for team camp?
    • This sums it all up to perfection.  
    • Just read the article! In one statement he says he didn’t know the player was academically ineligible yet he also says he met with a teacher in 2022 to discuss putting the player in credit recovery.  I find it hard to believe a Head Coach doesn’t know a player is not eligible; are they not responsible for clearing them to the TSSAA?   
×
  • Create New...