Big Ones

[FBGIRL]

When the results be posted?

[o21putt]

When all the games are over. Patience

[CoachT]

Sunday at Noon CDT

[jcm]

Thanks CoachT.

 

Anyway we can see our past picks (oh where did I go wrong!) and see prior year's schedules with results like we use to be able to do?

[CoachT]

Thanks CoachT.

 

Anyway we can see our past picks (oh where did I go wrong!) and see prior year's schedules with results like we use to be able to do?

 

The archived schedules will be re-added ASAP. We are waiting on some info from the TSSAA concerning classifications in years past before we can add them back.

 

I'll ask iamoz about your first question.

[Guest iamoz]

The archived schedules will be re-added ASAP. We are waiting on some info from the TSSAA concerning classifications in years past before we can add them back.

 

I'll ask iamoz about your first question.

 

 

Been working on these odd problems with replying to topics. As soon as that's stamped out I'll get working on this (and in-game scores).

[wareagle958]

Hey sorry but I'm new to the Big Ones contest- how can we see our scores and results

[CoachT]

Hey sorry but I'm new to the Big Ones contest- how can we see our scores and results

 

http://tennessee.coacht.com/bigones/

[lastone2know]

how do you pick which games u put on the contest? noticed the Riverdale vs Antioch not on this week..any reason or just can only put so many?? also this new format seems to take forever to enter picks...will this be the format throughout the season?? thanks

[CoachT]

how do you pick which games u put on the contest? noticed the Riverdale vs Antioch not on this week..any reason or just can only put so many?? also this new format seems to take forever to enter picks...will this be the format throughout the season?? thanks

 

I pick the games for the first few weeks and then let the winning percentages of the teams decide the games. Of course, all games are big to their players and fans but can't pick them all. Yes, this will be the format.

[jcm]

The standings seem to be having a little technical difficulty. Some out of 49 picks have 30 correct are are standing in the 163rds and some are standing in the 189ths (of course I'm in the 189s or I wouldn't have brought it up!)

[Guest iamoz]

The standings seem to be having a little technical difficulty. Some out of 49 picks have 30 correct are are standing in the 163rds and some are standing in the 189ths (of course I'm in the 189s or I wouldn't have brought it up!)

 

There's was a line between the two groups... cu7044 had 30 correct and had only picked 46 games (16 incorrect). I have adjusted the sorting so that cu7044 will appear at the top of the "30 correct group."