Jump to content

How far is this punt ?


ridge
 Share

Recommended Posts

Thanks to everyone for the views on this play. I have always interpreted the "Punting Stats" to mean that the distance was measured from the Line of Scrimmage to the point where the ball was downed or the point where the opposing team gained posession, therefore I have alway thought that on this play, the opposing team gained posession in the end zone. BUT, after reading the response about the ref throwing the bean bag at the point where the ball became LIVE, (the point where Team B touched the ball) you would have to acknowledge the fact that Posession was transferred to Team B since that is the only way Team A could regain posession, being that Team B touched the ball. So I guess that since Team B touched the ball on the 15 yd line, posession was transferred and the punt distance would be calculated to that point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The kick is "in progress" until the ball is possessed or declared dead by rule. Merely touching (football rules terminology - "Muffing") the ball doesn't end the kick. All kicks, and this is still a kick after being muffed, going into R's end zone are touchbacks.

 

 

So, are you saying the punt distance would be calculated to the goal line?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure. Do the statisticians consider a punt that becomes a touchback to be to the goal line or to the 20? There's your answer.

 

 

I think we've got a couple of different trains of thought going here. Most definately, a punt that goes into the end zone untouched for a touchback is calculated from the line of scrimmage to the goal line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we've got a couple of different trains of thought going here. Most definately, a punt that goes into the end zone untouched for a touchback is calculated from the line of scrimmage to the goal line.

 

 

That is correct. In the orginial question the ball touched a member of the receiving team. At that point the beanbag came out to mark the spot. That beanbag marks the length of the punt from the line of scrimmage. Where the receiving team controls the ball and then tries to advance it, is the length of the return. If they kicking team controls the ball, (the ball is considered live when it touched the receiving team member) they are credited with a fumble recovery and any yardage towards the receiving teams goal they can advance from the point of recovery. If the ball rolls into the endzone, after being touch by the receiving team, outside of the goal line, and the kicking team controls the ball in the endzone, touchdown kicking team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The back judge is in control of the scrimmage kick mayhem. In this situation. The ball should have been blown dead when the ball crossed into the end zone. Touch back first down R at the 20. No return allowed.

 

 

There are so many what ifs, in the post scrimmage kick(punt) enforcement rules. The White Hats have a nightmare on their hands, if an infraction occurs, sorting out: who did what to whom and where the ball was where and when.

 

That's your five man jury, consulting in the middle of the field, trying to get it right.

Video proves them right 95% of the time. /ph34r.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":ph34r:" border="0" alt="ph34r.gif" />

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The kick is "in progress" until the ball is possessed or declared dead by rule. Merely touching (football rules terminology - "Muffing") the ball doesn't end the kick. All kicks, and this is still a kick after being muffed, going into R's end zone are touchbacks.

 

 

Correct. This play has been talked about by many officials. The opinion is that the bean bag should not have been thrown.

Bag points of possession on kicks, fumbles and places where fumbles go out of bounds.

Hats are allowed as markers when bean bags have all been used. /flower.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":flower:" border="0" alt="flower.gif" />

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct. This play has been talked about by many officials. The opinion is that the bean bag should not have been thrown.

Bag points of possession on kicks, fumbles and places where fumbles go out of bounds.

Hats are allowed as markers when bean bags have all been used. /flower.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":flower:" border="0" alt="flower.gif" />

 

 

If the ball touches a recieving team member, the ball is now "live" and the kicking team can attempt to recover the "muff". The bag is thrown where the ball touched the recieving team. That is the length of the punt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • Recent Posts

    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
    • All these college signees went yo other schools for 3 years, were getting college offers then transferred to Bearden. It’s not like this staff did much to develop them.    The BBall coaches son and the Seymour transfer were some of the most talented QBs in the region, and you guys developed them into QBs who might complete one pass a game. 
×
  • Create New...