Jump to content

Individual State Tournament


catsbackr
 Share

Recommended Posts

Then why do you insist on bringing up teams over and over and over again.

 

You qualifying for the State for 2 years (and congrats on that) does in no way make you any more qualified to discuss the set up of the State INDIVIDUALS than I am. I have been to the State, this will make 3 years straight, watching our teams win 2 times. I am very familiar with the State tournament.

 

Huh???

 

There you go with the TEAM thing again. I'm not talking about teams.

 

That is just a plain ridiculous.

 

Anyway, the very best of luck to you and the rest of the qualifiers this year.

 

 

I meant bystander, typo. Ok, so. I have not brought the teams up over and over again, it is merely a connection to what you are saying. You seem adamant that every team at state should be there, while completely adamant that every individual should not be there. Bowlers averaging in the 180s made the semifinals last year and finished very well. So, an average around 180 can obviously bowl better than the other averages over 200 who did not qualify for the semifinals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

OK, I surrender on this one, I guess because we can't seem to understand what each other are saying.

 

I agree, averages 170 and up do have a chance in State singles. 170 and WAY UP. Cummulative average for the final 6 in the Individuals last year was 204.

 

You seem adamant that every team at state should be there....

 

No, this is what I said.

All of the teams at the State tournament deserve to be there. They have gone through District, Region and Sectional tournaments. They definitely deserve to be there.

 

....while completely adamant that every individual should not be there.

 

No, this is what I said.

Individuals do not go through any of the above. No Districts, no Regions, no Sectionals to get to the State.

 

Bowlers averaging in the 180s made the semifinals last year and finished very well.

 

They did make it to the semi-finals but did not finish well. The final 6 and their averages: Faulkner 211, Flatt 206, Chapman 197, Sanders 205, Dixon 196, McDaniel 211.

 

This is kind of going nowhere, so, best of luck the rest of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...