Jump to content

Coaching


akula21
 Share

Recommended Posts

Had a debate with a friend recently that we argued the importance of a coach being a capable player. I felt that a coach with technical ability to demonstrate things properly was very important. I also felt that the coaches playing experience was important to add credibility. My friend didn't think either was very important to be a good coach. Just wanted to see what others thought. I know of good coaches that may not be great players and I certainly know great players who are not good coaches. I just think of the best ones being good coaches and players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had a debate with a friend recently that we argued the importance of a coach being a capable player. I felt that a coach with technical ability to demonstrate things properly was very important. I also felt that the coaches playing experience was important to add credibility. My friend didn't think either was very important to be a good coach. Just wanted to see what others thought. I know of good coaches that may not be great players and I certainly know great players who are not good coaches. I just think of the best ones being good coaches and players.

 

Good question. First of all, I don't think you have to be a former player to be a good coach, but I think it REALLY helps. The reason for that are multiple; it does give credibility, it allows you to demonstrate what you want the players to do, it helps you to understand what the players are going through on the pitch under tough game circumstances, and I think your knowlegde of the game is better.

 

Now, saying that, I think that one can be a great student of the game and not necessarily be a great former player. I know many GREAT soccer players that made lousy coaches, and vice versa. But my best coaches were those who played the game on a college or higher level. Look at most of the successful programs and I think you will find former players in the coaching positions, OR you will find a former player as an assistant. Which brings me to my next point:

 

You need to have a coach that connects with his players. This is, I believe, the most important part of a team. I know of some great coaches across the state that haven't played college ball, but REALLY connect with their players. They also had the "smarts" to find an assistant coach that has the knowledge or technical skill that they lacked.

 

Akula, technical skills are KEY to being successful. It doesn't matter if you are a tactical genius. If your players can't make the pass to the forward making the perfect run, or if your shots are going all over the field and not in the goal, then what is the point? This is why club soccer is so key to the success of players. They have REALLY done a great job in working in this area, which saves highschool coaches a lot of time. I expect my players to have the technical skills downpat by the time they get on the varsity squad. This means that they have spent the past 5-8 years developing those skills in the other 8 months of the year.

 

You want a great program? Get your boys on a club team. You say it is too expensive, ok... then get your boy in the back yard with a Coerver tape working on "inside inside" every day for 30 minutes. Get to where you can juggle the ball with both feet over 100 times. Get your dad or brother to toss you balls and work on traps, volleys, headers, ect. These are all things you can do without any $$. BUT, club brings game experience, even if it isn't a division 1 club team.

 

Now, these are just my opinions. Doesn't mean they are right, just how I feel, and how I run my program. I think I know where Akula is coming from, and his program has developed (in my mind) to be one of the top in TN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good question. First of all, I don't think you have to be a former player to be a good coach, but I think it REALLY helps. The reason for that are multiple; it does give credibility, it allows you to demonstrate what you want the players to do, it helps you to understand what the players are going through on the pitch under tough game circumstances, and I think your knowlegde of the game is better.

 

Now, saying that, I think that one can be a great student of the game and not necessarily be a great former player. I know many GREAT soccer players that made lousy coaches, and vice versa. But my best coaches were those who played the game on a college or higher level. Look at most of the successful programs and I think you will find former players in the coaching positions, OR you will find a former player as an assistant. Which brings me to my next point:

 

You need to have a coach that connects with his players. This is, I believe, the most important part of a team. I know of some great coaches across the state that haven't played college ball, but REALLY connect with their players. They also had the "smarts" to find an assistant coach that has the knowledge or technical skill that they lacked.

 

Akula, technical skills are KEY to being successful. It doesn't matter if you are a tactical genius. If your players can't make the pass to the forward making the perfect run, or if your shots are going all over the field and not in the goal, then what is the point? This is why club soccer is so key to the success of players. They have REALLY done a great job in working in this area, which saves highschool coaches a lot of time. I expect my players to have the technical skills downpat by the time they get on the varsity squad. This means that they have spent the past 5-8 years developing those skills in the other 8 months of the year.

 

You want a great program? Get your boys on a club team. You say it is too expensive, ok... then get your boy in the back yard with a Coerver tape working on "inside inside" every day for 30 minutes. Get to where you can juggle the ball with both feet over 100 times. Get your dad or brother to toss you balls and work on traps, volleys, headers, ect. These are all things you can do without any $$. BUT, club brings game experience, even if it isn't a division 1 club team.

 

Now, these are just my opinions. Doesn't mean they are right, just how I feel, and how I run my program. I think I know where Akula is coming from, and his program has developed (in my mind) to be one of the top in TN.

 

 

 

If there is no club system in place it is rough to do much with TSSAA and dead periods and play time periods and weight lift periods I mean why not let the coaches coach and the players work hard at it in the offseason i mean in the county I get to see play there might be a total of 12 club teams and that is from 8 years and up to 18

and with all these regulations TSSAA is handicapping us even more especially with what the privates and other knoxville are programs have to offer and choose from

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there is no club system in place it is rough to do much with TSSAA and dead periods and play time periods and weight lift periods I mean why not let the coaches coach and the players work hard at it in the offseason i mean in the county I get to see play there might be a total of 12 club teams and that is from 8 years and up to 18

and with all these regulations TSSAA is handicapping us even more especially with what the privates and other knoxville are programs have to offer and choose from

 

 

Your coaches should check the schedule. There are periods this summer where the kids can train with their coach, if they wanted to, I'd worry about burnout. If the kids want it enough, they'll find a club. We give our kids a program during the summer/fall/winter that they can access to do ball work and fitness. So even if they don't play club, they have every opportunity to get better on their own. Like G said, money is not the final denominator, work ethic and dedication is!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your coaches should check the schedule. There are periods this summer where the kids can train with their coach, if they wanted to, I'd worry about burnout. If the kids want it enough, they'll find a club. We give our kids a program during the summer/fall/winter that they can access to do ball work and fitness. So even if they don't play club, they have every opportunity to get better on their own. Like G said, money is not the final denominator, work ethic and dedication is!

 

Agreed. We have two players on our club team who travel 90 minutes each way to practice everyday. If there is desire, there is a way to make it happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. We have two players on our club team who travel 90 minutes each way to practice everyday. If there is desire, there is a way to make it happen.

 

 

 

They are plenty of ways around the TSSAA "dead periods." All that means is that you can't be on campus or have contact with your coach. You can work out off campus and with other players and many facilities offer dead period training!

 

Just ask the American football coaches (and families.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Akula,

 

I agree that a coach's technical ability and playing experience is extremely important. I think playing experience is more important than technical ability though. In other words, there might be an old fart who was once a great player, but his time is done. However, he still understands the game based on his previous experience. Too many times in high school you run in to coaches that can't understand what a player is going through because they haven't played the game themselves. Example: A couple of years ago I was coaching on a TERRIBLE pitch, and the opposing coach was furious with his players because their first touch was off. As a former player, I was a little more forgiving of my players' clumsy first touch. (I had played in many similar situations myself).

 

I am not saying that you can't be a great coach without experience, but I always think it helps you better understand your players.

 

Side note: I think it is important for a coach to separate himself from his players. When I first started coaching, all I wanted to do was lace up my boots and play with the kids; thus, nothing got accomplished. Sure, it is good for a coach to get in and demonstrate every now and then. But I am a firm believer that when a coach starts playing too much, he forgets about coaching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements

  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...